How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examined visual estimation of surface roughness using random, computer-generated, three-dimensional (3D) surfaces rendered under a mixture of diffuse lighting and a punctate source. The angle between the tangent to the plane containing the surface texture and the direction to the punctate source was varied from 50 to 70 deg across lighting conditions. Observers were presented with pairs of surfaces under different lighting conditions and indicated which 3D surface appeared rougher. Surfaces were viewed either in isolation or in scenes with added objects whose shading, cast shadows, and specular highlights provided information about the spatial distribution of illumination. All observers perceived surfaces to be markedly rougher with decreasing illuminant angle. Performance in scenes with added objects was no closer to constant than that in scenes without added objects. We identified four novel cues that are valid cues to roughness under any single lighting condition but that are not invariant under changes in lighting condition. We modeled observers' deviations from roughness constancy as a weighted linear combination of these "pseudocues" and found that they account for a substantial amount of observers' systematic deviations from roughness constancy with changes in lighting condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number8
Pages (from-to)634-648
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume6
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 5 2006

Fingerprint

Lighting
Cues
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Perceived surface roughness
  • Roughness constancy
  • Texture perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness. / Ho, Yun Xian; Landy, Michael S.; Maloney, Laurence T.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 6, No. 5, 8, 05.05.2006, p. 634-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{42a7d72b9d4c490884ebe57a10c438a0,
title = "How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness",
abstract = "We examined visual estimation of surface roughness using random, computer-generated, three-dimensional (3D) surfaces rendered under a mixture of diffuse lighting and a punctate source. The angle between the tangent to the plane containing the surface texture and the direction to the punctate source was varied from 50 to 70 deg across lighting conditions. Observers were presented with pairs of surfaces under different lighting conditions and indicated which 3D surface appeared rougher. Surfaces were viewed either in isolation or in scenes with added objects whose shading, cast shadows, and specular highlights provided information about the spatial distribution of illumination. All observers perceived surfaces to be markedly rougher with decreasing illuminant angle. Performance in scenes with added objects was no closer to constant than that in scenes without added objects. We identified four novel cues that are valid cues to roughness under any single lighting condition but that are not invariant under changes in lighting condition. We modeled observers' deviations from roughness constancy as a weighted linear combination of these {"}pseudocues{"} and found that they account for a substantial amount of observers' systematic deviations from roughness constancy with changes in lighting condition.",
keywords = "Perceived surface roughness, Roughness constancy, Texture perception",
author = "Ho, {Yun Xian} and Landy, {Michael S.} and Maloney, {Laurence T.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1167/6.5.8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "634--648",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How direction of illumination affects visually perceived surface roughness

AU - Ho, Yun Xian

AU - Landy, Michael S.

AU - Maloney, Laurence T.

PY - 2006/5/5

Y1 - 2006/5/5

N2 - We examined visual estimation of surface roughness using random, computer-generated, three-dimensional (3D) surfaces rendered under a mixture of diffuse lighting and a punctate source. The angle between the tangent to the plane containing the surface texture and the direction to the punctate source was varied from 50 to 70 deg across lighting conditions. Observers were presented with pairs of surfaces under different lighting conditions and indicated which 3D surface appeared rougher. Surfaces were viewed either in isolation or in scenes with added objects whose shading, cast shadows, and specular highlights provided information about the spatial distribution of illumination. All observers perceived surfaces to be markedly rougher with decreasing illuminant angle. Performance in scenes with added objects was no closer to constant than that in scenes without added objects. We identified four novel cues that are valid cues to roughness under any single lighting condition but that are not invariant under changes in lighting condition. We modeled observers' deviations from roughness constancy as a weighted linear combination of these "pseudocues" and found that they account for a substantial amount of observers' systematic deviations from roughness constancy with changes in lighting condition.

AB - We examined visual estimation of surface roughness using random, computer-generated, three-dimensional (3D) surfaces rendered under a mixture of diffuse lighting and a punctate source. The angle between the tangent to the plane containing the surface texture and the direction to the punctate source was varied from 50 to 70 deg across lighting conditions. Observers were presented with pairs of surfaces under different lighting conditions and indicated which 3D surface appeared rougher. Surfaces were viewed either in isolation or in scenes with added objects whose shading, cast shadows, and specular highlights provided information about the spatial distribution of illumination. All observers perceived surfaces to be markedly rougher with decreasing illuminant angle. Performance in scenes with added objects was no closer to constant than that in scenes without added objects. We identified four novel cues that are valid cues to roughness under any single lighting condition but that are not invariant under changes in lighting condition. We modeled observers' deviations from roughness constancy as a weighted linear combination of these "pseudocues" and found that they account for a substantial amount of observers' systematic deviations from roughness constancy with changes in lighting condition.

KW - Perceived surface roughness

KW - Roughness constancy

KW - Texture perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646685907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646685907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/6.5.8

DO - 10.1167/6.5.8

M3 - Article

C2 - 16881794

AN - SCOPUS:33646685907

VL - 6

SP - 634

EP - 648

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 5

M1 - 8

ER -