Homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different

Aaron Abrams, Noel Brady, Pallavi Dani, Robert Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different ways of measuring the difficulty of filling a closed curve inside a group or a space. The homological Dehn function measures fillings of cycles by chains, whereas the homotopical Dehn function measures fillings of curves by disks. Because the two definitions involve different sorts of boundaries and fillings, there is no a priori relationship between the two functions; however, before this work, there were no known examples of finitely presented groups for which the two functions differ. This paper gives such examples, constructed by amalgamating a free-by-cyclic group with several Bestvina-Brady groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19206-19212
Number of pages7
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume110
Issue number48
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 26 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different. / Abrams, Aaron; Brady, Noel; Dani, Pallavi; Young, Robert.

In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 110, No. 48, 26.11.2013, p. 19206-19212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{67d98d53f75c4d0f9e32a34810b816cd,
title = "Homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different",
abstract = "The homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different ways of measuring the difficulty of filling a closed curve inside a group or a space. The homological Dehn function measures fillings of cycles by chains, whereas the homotopical Dehn function measures fillings of curves by disks. Because the two definitions involve different sorts of boundaries and fillings, there is no a priori relationship between the two functions; however, before this work, there were no known examples of finitely presented groups for which the two functions differ. This paper gives such examples, constructed by amalgamating a free-by-cyclic group with several Bestvina-Brady groups.",
author = "Aaron Abrams and Noel Brady and Pallavi Dani and Robert Young",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.1207377110",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "110",
pages = "19206--19212",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "48",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different

AU - Abrams, Aaron

AU - Brady, Noel

AU - Dani, Pallavi

AU - Young, Robert

PY - 2013/11/26

Y1 - 2013/11/26

N2 - The homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different ways of measuring the difficulty of filling a closed curve inside a group or a space. The homological Dehn function measures fillings of cycles by chains, whereas the homotopical Dehn function measures fillings of curves by disks. Because the two definitions involve different sorts of boundaries and fillings, there is no a priori relationship between the two functions; however, before this work, there were no known examples of finitely presented groups for which the two functions differ. This paper gives such examples, constructed by amalgamating a free-by-cyclic group with several Bestvina-Brady groups.

AB - The homological and homotopical Dehn functions are different ways of measuring the difficulty of filling a closed curve inside a group or a space. The homological Dehn function measures fillings of cycles by chains, whereas the homotopical Dehn function measures fillings of curves by disks. Because the two definitions involve different sorts of boundaries and fillings, there is no a priori relationship between the two functions; however, before this work, there were no known examples of finitely presented groups for which the two functions differ. This paper gives such examples, constructed by amalgamating a free-by-cyclic group with several Bestvina-Brady groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888325045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888325045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.1207377110

DO - 10.1073/pnas.1207377110

M3 - Article

VL - 110

SP - 19206

EP - 19212

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 48

ER -