Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents

Edward Seidman, Sara Pedersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

What are the characteristic ways in which risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence have been studied? What are the implicit assumptions underlying this body of research and scholarship? This chapter addresses these questions in the domain of adolescent development, with an emphasis on how a set of alternative assumptions and related research and data analytic strategies can both enrich our understanding of youth well-being and increase our ability to promote positive developmental outcomes. Risk, Protection, And Competence. We define the central phenomena of interest: risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence. Either an individual or a population can be at increased risk for some form of negative developmental outcome, be it delinquency, drug use, depression, schizophrenia, school dropout, or unemployment. Multiple risk or vulnerability factors increase the likelihood that an individual or a population will manifest negative developmental outcomes. Many studies indicate that it is not any single risk factor that is problematic, but the accumulation of multiple risks (e.g., Sameroff & Seifer, 1990). Protective factors are defined as experiences that ameliorate the negative impact of risks. Some investigators have operationalized protective and vulnerability factors in conjunction with each other as part of a multiple risk index (Sameroff & Seifer, 1990), whereas other scholars have argued that protective processes are set in motion only in the presence of adverse risk factors (Rutter, 1990).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages318-342
Number of pages25
ISBN (Print)9780511615788, 0521001617, 9780521807012
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Mental Competency
Student Dropouts
Adolescent Development
Aptitude
Unemployment
Research
Population
Schizophrenia
Research Personnel
Depression
Pharmaceutical Preparations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Seidman, E., & Pedersen, S. (2003). Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents. In Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities (pp. 318-342). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615788.015

Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents. / Seidman, Edward; Pedersen, Sara.

Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. Cambridge University Press, 2003. p. 318-342.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Seidman, E & Pedersen, S 2003, Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents. in Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. Cambridge University Press, pp. 318-342. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615788.015
Seidman E, Pedersen S. Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents. In Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. Cambridge University Press. 2003. p. 318-342 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615788.015
Seidman, Edward ; Pedersen, Sara. / Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents. Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities. Cambridge University Press, 2003. pp. 318-342
@inbook{542cc9694913411abe42cf2526165f70,
title = "Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents",
abstract = "What are the characteristic ways in which risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence have been studied? What are the implicit assumptions underlying this body of research and scholarship? This chapter addresses these questions in the domain of adolescent development, with an emphasis on how a set of alternative assumptions and related research and data analytic strategies can both enrich our understanding of youth well-being and increase our ability to promote positive developmental outcomes. Risk, Protection, And Competence. We define the central phenomena of interest: risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence. Either an individual or a population can be at increased risk for some form of negative developmental outcome, be it delinquency, drug use, depression, schizophrenia, school dropout, or unemployment. Multiple risk or vulnerability factors increase the likelihood that an individual or a population will manifest negative developmental outcomes. Many studies indicate that it is not any single risk factor that is problematic, but the accumulation of multiple risks (e.g., Sameroff & Seifer, 1990). Protective factors are defined as experiences that ameliorate the negative impact of risks. Some investigators have operationalized protective and vulnerability factors in conjunction with each other as part of a multiple risk index (Sameroff & Seifer, 1990), whereas other scholars have argued that protective processes are set in motion only in the presence of adverse risk factors (Rutter, 1990).",
author = "Edward Seidman and Sara Pedersen",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511615788.015",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511615788",
pages = "318--342",
booktitle = "Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Holistic contextual perspectives on risk, protection, and competence among low-income urban adolescents

AU - Seidman, Edward

AU - Pedersen, Sara

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - What are the characteristic ways in which risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence have been studied? What are the implicit assumptions underlying this body of research and scholarship? This chapter addresses these questions in the domain of adolescent development, with an emphasis on how a set of alternative assumptions and related research and data analytic strategies can both enrich our understanding of youth well-being and increase our ability to promote positive developmental outcomes. Risk, Protection, And Competence. We define the central phenomena of interest: risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence. Either an individual or a population can be at increased risk for some form of negative developmental outcome, be it delinquency, drug use, depression, schizophrenia, school dropout, or unemployment. Multiple risk or vulnerability factors increase the likelihood that an individual or a population will manifest negative developmental outcomes. Many studies indicate that it is not any single risk factor that is problematic, but the accumulation of multiple risks (e.g., Sameroff & Seifer, 1990). Protective factors are defined as experiences that ameliorate the negative impact of risks. Some investigators have operationalized protective and vulnerability factors in conjunction with each other as part of a multiple risk index (Sameroff & Seifer, 1990), whereas other scholars have argued that protective processes are set in motion only in the presence of adverse risk factors (Rutter, 1990).

AB - What are the characteristic ways in which risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence have been studied? What are the implicit assumptions underlying this body of research and scholarship? This chapter addresses these questions in the domain of adolescent development, with an emphasis on how a set of alternative assumptions and related research and data analytic strategies can both enrich our understanding of youth well-being and increase our ability to promote positive developmental outcomes. Risk, Protection, And Competence. We define the central phenomena of interest: risk, vulnerability, protection, and competence. Either an individual or a population can be at increased risk for some form of negative developmental outcome, be it delinquency, drug use, depression, schizophrenia, school dropout, or unemployment. Multiple risk or vulnerability factors increase the likelihood that an individual or a population will manifest negative developmental outcomes. Many studies indicate that it is not any single risk factor that is problematic, but the accumulation of multiple risks (e.g., Sameroff & Seifer, 1990). Protective factors are defined as experiences that ameliorate the negative impact of risks. Some investigators have operationalized protective and vulnerability factors in conjunction with each other as part of a multiple risk index (Sameroff & Seifer, 1990), whereas other scholars have argued that protective processes are set in motion only in the presence of adverse risk factors (Rutter, 1990).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923525236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84923525236&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.015

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511615788.015

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84923525236

SN - 9780511615788

SN - 0521001617

SN - 9780521807012

SP - 318

EP - 342

BT - Resilience and Vulnerability: Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -