HIV testing in the nation's opioid treatment programs, 2005-2011: The role of state regulations

Thomas D'Aunno, Harold A. Pollack, Lan Jiang, Lisa R. Metsch, Peter D. Friedmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective To identify the extent to which clients in a national sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) received HIV testing in 2005 and 2011; to examine relationships between state laws for informed consent and pretest counseling and rates of HIV testing among OTP clients. Data Source Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of OTPs in 2005 (n = 171) and 2011 (n = 200). Study Design Random-effects logit and interval regression analyses were used to examine changes in HIV testing rates and the relationship of state laws to HIV testing among OTPs. Data Collection Data on OTP provision of HIV testing were collected in phone surveys from OTP managers; data also were collected on state laws for HIV testing. Principal Findings The percentage of OTPs offering HIV testing decreased significantly from 93 percent in 2005 to 64 percent in 2011. Similarly, the percentage of clients tested decreased from an average of 41 percent in 2005 to 17 percent in 2011. OTPs located in states whose laws do not require pretest counseling and that use opt-out consent were more likely to provide HIV testing and to test higher percentages of clients. Conclusions The results show the need to increase HIV testing among OTP clients; the results also underscore the beneficial possibilities of dropping pretest counseling as a requirement for HIV testing and of using the opt-out approach to informed consent for testing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-248
Number of pages19
JournalHealth Services Research
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Opioid Analgesics
HIV
Counseling
Informed Consent
Information Storage and Retrieval
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • health policy
  • HIV testing
  • HIV/AIDS
  • opioid treatment
  • organizational factors
  • state regulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

HIV testing in the nation's opioid treatment programs, 2005-2011 : The role of state regulations. / D'Aunno, Thomas; Pollack, Harold A.; Jiang, Lan; Metsch, Lisa R.; Friedmann, Peter D.

In: Health Services Research, Vol. 49, No. 1, 02.2014, p. 230-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

D'Aunno, Thomas ; Pollack, Harold A. ; Jiang, Lan ; Metsch, Lisa R. ; Friedmann, Peter D. / HIV testing in the nation's opioid treatment programs, 2005-2011 : The role of state regulations. In: Health Services Research. 2014 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 230-248.
@article{5cfa8322394b45cabc15ccbdbf7e52bf,
title = "HIV testing in the nation's opioid treatment programs, 2005-2011: The role of state regulations",
abstract = "Objective To identify the extent to which clients in a national sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) received HIV testing in 2005 and 2011; to examine relationships between state laws for informed consent and pretest counseling and rates of HIV testing among OTP clients. Data Source Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of OTPs in 2005 (n = 171) and 2011 (n = 200). Study Design Random-effects logit and interval regression analyses were used to examine changes in HIV testing rates and the relationship of state laws to HIV testing among OTPs. Data Collection Data on OTP provision of HIV testing were collected in phone surveys from OTP managers; data also were collected on state laws for HIV testing. Principal Findings The percentage of OTPs offering HIV testing decreased significantly from 93 percent in 2005 to 64 percent in 2011. Similarly, the percentage of clients tested decreased from an average of 41 percent in 2005 to 17 percent in 2011. OTPs located in states whose laws do not require pretest counseling and that use opt-out consent were more likely to provide HIV testing and to test higher percentages of clients. Conclusions The results show the need to increase HIV testing among OTP clients; the results also underscore the beneficial possibilities of dropping pretest counseling as a requirement for HIV testing and of using the opt-out approach to informed consent for testing.",
keywords = "health policy, HIV testing, HIV/AIDS, opioid treatment, organizational factors, state regulation",
author = "Thomas D'Aunno and Pollack, {Harold A.} and Lan Jiang and Metsch, {Lisa R.} and Friedmann, {Peter D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/1475-6773.12094",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "230--248",
journal = "Health Services Research",
issn = "0017-9124",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - HIV testing in the nation's opioid treatment programs, 2005-2011

T2 - The role of state regulations

AU - D'Aunno, Thomas

AU - Pollack, Harold A.

AU - Jiang, Lan

AU - Metsch, Lisa R.

AU - Friedmann, Peter D.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Objective To identify the extent to which clients in a national sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) received HIV testing in 2005 and 2011; to examine relationships between state laws for informed consent and pretest counseling and rates of HIV testing among OTP clients. Data Source Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of OTPs in 2005 (n = 171) and 2011 (n = 200). Study Design Random-effects logit and interval regression analyses were used to examine changes in HIV testing rates and the relationship of state laws to HIV testing among OTPs. Data Collection Data on OTP provision of HIV testing were collected in phone surveys from OTP managers; data also were collected on state laws for HIV testing. Principal Findings The percentage of OTPs offering HIV testing decreased significantly from 93 percent in 2005 to 64 percent in 2011. Similarly, the percentage of clients tested decreased from an average of 41 percent in 2005 to 17 percent in 2011. OTPs located in states whose laws do not require pretest counseling and that use opt-out consent were more likely to provide HIV testing and to test higher percentages of clients. Conclusions The results show the need to increase HIV testing among OTP clients; the results also underscore the beneficial possibilities of dropping pretest counseling as a requirement for HIV testing and of using the opt-out approach to informed consent for testing.

AB - Objective To identify the extent to which clients in a national sample of opioid treatment programs (OTPs) received HIV testing in 2005 and 2011; to examine relationships between state laws for informed consent and pretest counseling and rates of HIV testing among OTP clients. Data Source Data were collected from a nationally representative sample of OTPs in 2005 (n = 171) and 2011 (n = 200). Study Design Random-effects logit and interval regression analyses were used to examine changes in HIV testing rates and the relationship of state laws to HIV testing among OTPs. Data Collection Data on OTP provision of HIV testing were collected in phone surveys from OTP managers; data also were collected on state laws for HIV testing. Principal Findings The percentage of OTPs offering HIV testing decreased significantly from 93 percent in 2005 to 64 percent in 2011. Similarly, the percentage of clients tested decreased from an average of 41 percent in 2005 to 17 percent in 2011. OTPs located in states whose laws do not require pretest counseling and that use opt-out consent were more likely to provide HIV testing and to test higher percentages of clients. Conclusions The results show the need to increase HIV testing among OTP clients; the results also underscore the beneficial possibilities of dropping pretest counseling as a requirement for HIV testing and of using the opt-out approach to informed consent for testing.

KW - health policy

KW - HIV testing

KW - HIV/AIDS

KW - opioid treatment

KW - organizational factors

KW - state regulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892826674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892826674&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1475-6773.12094

DO - 10.1111/1475-6773.12094

M3 - Article

C2 - 23855724

AN - SCOPUS:84892826674

VL - 49

SP - 230

EP - 248

JO - Health Services Research

JF - Health Services Research

SN - 0017-9124

IS - 1

ER -