Histomorphometrical comparison of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and a thin ion beam deposited bioceramic surfaces at early implantation times. An experimental study in dogs

Marcelo Suzuki, Charles Marin, Rodrigo Granato, Paulo Coelho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Among surface modifications commercially available for dental implants, the incorporation of bioceramic coatings is one of the most popular. However, concerns regarding the effectiveness of the bond between the metallic surface and the coating have led to the development of thin-film Ca-and P- based bioceramic coatings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early bone response to a thin ion bean deposited (Test) bioceramic implant surface compared to an alumina-blasted/acid-etched (Control) surface in a canine model. Results showed that although no difference in bone-to-implant (BIC) could be noted between the two different surfaces, more organized bone architecture was present around the Test implants in 4 weeks. Based on this observation, the incorporation of a thin- film bioceramic coating positively influenced bone healing around dental implants at early times.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)327-330
Number of pages4
JournalKey Engineering Materials
Volume396-398
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Bioceramics
Aluminum Oxide
Ion beams
Bone
Alumina
Coatings
Dental prostheses
Acids
imidazole mustard
Thin films
Control surfaces
Surface treatment
Ions

Keywords

  • Bioceramic
  • Coating
  • Dogs
  • Implant
  • In vivo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Materials Science(all)

Cite this

Histomorphometrical comparison of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and a thin ion beam deposited bioceramic surfaces at early implantation times. An experimental study in dogs. / Suzuki, Marcelo; Marin, Charles; Granato, Rodrigo; Coelho, Paulo.

In: Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 396-398, 2009, p. 327-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8e2e963b400c489eb01f33c6097ed842,
title = "Histomorphometrical comparison of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and a thin ion beam deposited bioceramic surfaces at early implantation times. An experimental study in dogs",
abstract = "Among surface modifications commercially available for dental implants, the incorporation of bioceramic coatings is one of the most popular. However, concerns regarding the effectiveness of the bond between the metallic surface and the coating have led to the development of thin-film Ca-and P- based bioceramic coatings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early bone response to a thin ion bean deposited (Test) bioceramic implant surface compared to an alumina-blasted/acid-etched (Control) surface in a canine model. Results showed that although no difference in bone-to-implant (BIC) could be noted between the two different surfaces, more organized bone architecture was present around the Test implants in 4 weeks. Based on this observation, the incorporation of a thin- film bioceramic coating positively influenced bone healing around dental implants at early times.",
keywords = "Bioceramic, Coating, Dogs, Implant, In vivo",
author = "Marcelo Suzuki and Charles Marin and Rodrigo Granato and Paulo Coelho",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.4028/0-87849-353-0.327",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "396-398",
pages = "327--330",
journal = "Key Engineering Materials",
issn = "1013-9826",
publisher = "Trans Tech Publications",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histomorphometrical comparison of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and a thin ion beam deposited bioceramic surfaces at early implantation times. An experimental study in dogs

AU - Suzuki, Marcelo

AU - Marin, Charles

AU - Granato, Rodrigo

AU - Coelho, Paulo

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Among surface modifications commercially available for dental implants, the incorporation of bioceramic coatings is one of the most popular. However, concerns regarding the effectiveness of the bond between the metallic surface and the coating have led to the development of thin-film Ca-and P- based bioceramic coatings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early bone response to a thin ion bean deposited (Test) bioceramic implant surface compared to an alumina-blasted/acid-etched (Control) surface in a canine model. Results showed that although no difference in bone-to-implant (BIC) could be noted between the two different surfaces, more organized bone architecture was present around the Test implants in 4 weeks. Based on this observation, the incorporation of a thin- film bioceramic coating positively influenced bone healing around dental implants at early times.

AB - Among surface modifications commercially available for dental implants, the incorporation of bioceramic coatings is one of the most popular. However, concerns regarding the effectiveness of the bond between the metallic surface and the coating have led to the development of thin-film Ca-and P- based bioceramic coatings. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early bone response to a thin ion bean deposited (Test) bioceramic implant surface compared to an alumina-blasted/acid-etched (Control) surface in a canine model. Results showed that although no difference in bone-to-implant (BIC) could be noted between the two different surfaces, more organized bone architecture was present around the Test implants in 4 weeks. Based on this observation, the incorporation of a thin- film bioceramic coating positively influenced bone healing around dental implants at early times.

KW - Bioceramic

KW - Coating

KW - Dogs

KW - Implant

KW - In vivo

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58849112314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58849112314&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4028/0-87849-353-0.327

DO - 10.4028/0-87849-353-0.327

M3 - Article

VL - 396-398

SP - 327

EP - 330

JO - Key Engineering Materials

JF - Key Engineering Materials

SN - 1013-9826

ER -