Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: A study in dogs

Paulo Coelho, Giuseppe Cardaropoli, Marcelo Suzuki, Jack E. Lemons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone response to a nanothickness bioceramic ion beam-assisted deposition (IBAD) on endosteal implants in a canine model. Materials and Methods: Alumina-blasted/acid-etched (control) and IBAD-modified (test) implants were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy + ion beam milling, thin-film mode X-ray diffraction, and atomic force microscope. The implants were surgically placed in four dogs' proximal tibiae and remained for 2 and 4 weeks in vivo. Oxytetracycline (10 mg/kg) was administered for bone labeling 48 hours prior to euthanization. Following euthanization, nondecalcified thin sections were prepared for UV and transmitted light microscopy. The amount of bone labeling was evaluated along the length and away from the implant surface by means of a computer software. The % bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was determined for each specimen. One-way analysis of variance at 95% level of significance along with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons were utilized for statistical evaluation. The characterization showed Ca- and P-based amorphous coatings with a 20- to 50-nm thickness. Results: In vivo results showed a significant increase in general and site-specific (to 0.5 mm from the implant surface) bone activity for the 4-week test implants compared with the control implants. Bone activity levels decreased as a function of distance from the implant surface for all groups. No significant differences in BIC were observed between groups. Conclusions: This study showed that both surfaces were biocompatible and osteoconductive and that a time-dependent increase in osteoactivity occurred around the test implants.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)292-302
Number of pages11
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Dogs
Bone and Bones
Ions
Photoelectron Spectroscopy
Oxytetracycline
Aluminum Oxide
Ultraviolet Rays
Tibia
X-Ray Diffraction
Electron Scanning Microscopy
Canidae
Microscopy
Analysis of Variance
Software
Acids

Keywords

  • Animal model
  • Bioceramic
  • Implant surface
  • Nanothickness
  • Osteoactivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants : A study in dogs. / Coelho, Paulo; Cardaropoli, Giuseppe; Suzuki, Marcelo; Lemons, Jack E.

In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 11, No. 4, 12.2009, p. 292-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0f8c484223684e16b9b02a306aea0531,
title = "Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: A study in dogs",
abstract = "Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone response to a nanothickness bioceramic ion beam-assisted deposition (IBAD) on endosteal implants in a canine model. Materials and Methods: Alumina-blasted/acid-etched (control) and IBAD-modified (test) implants were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy + ion beam milling, thin-film mode X-ray diffraction, and atomic force microscope. The implants were surgically placed in four dogs' proximal tibiae and remained for 2 and 4 weeks in vivo. Oxytetracycline (10 mg/kg) was administered for bone labeling 48 hours prior to euthanization. Following euthanization, nondecalcified thin sections were prepared for UV and transmitted light microscopy. The amount of bone labeling was evaluated along the length and away from the implant surface by means of a computer software. The {\%} bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was determined for each specimen. One-way analysis of variance at 95{\%} level of significance along with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons were utilized for statistical evaluation. The characterization showed Ca- and P-based amorphous coatings with a 20- to 50-nm thickness. Results: In vivo results showed a significant increase in general and site-specific (to 0.5 mm from the implant surface) bone activity for the 4-week test implants compared with the control implants. Bone activity levels decreased as a function of distance from the implant surface for all groups. No significant differences in BIC were observed between groups. Conclusions: This study showed that both surfaces were biocompatible and osteoconductive and that a time-dependent increase in osteoactivity occurred around the test implants.",
keywords = "Animal model, Bioceramic, Implant surface, Nanothickness, Osteoactivity",
author = "Paulo Coelho and Giuseppe Cardaropoli and Marcelo Suzuki and Lemons, {Jack E.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00122.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "292--302",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants

T2 - A study in dogs

AU - Coelho, Paulo

AU - Cardaropoli, Giuseppe

AU - Suzuki, Marcelo

AU - Lemons, Jack E.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone response to a nanothickness bioceramic ion beam-assisted deposition (IBAD) on endosteal implants in a canine model. Materials and Methods: Alumina-blasted/acid-etched (control) and IBAD-modified (test) implants were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy + ion beam milling, thin-film mode X-ray diffraction, and atomic force microscope. The implants were surgically placed in four dogs' proximal tibiae and remained for 2 and 4 weeks in vivo. Oxytetracycline (10 mg/kg) was administered for bone labeling 48 hours prior to euthanization. Following euthanization, nondecalcified thin sections were prepared for UV and transmitted light microscopy. The amount of bone labeling was evaluated along the length and away from the implant surface by means of a computer software. The % bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was determined for each specimen. One-way analysis of variance at 95% level of significance along with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons were utilized for statistical evaluation. The characterization showed Ca- and P-based amorphous coatings with a 20- to 50-nm thickness. Results: In vivo results showed a significant increase in general and site-specific (to 0.5 mm from the implant surface) bone activity for the 4-week test implants compared with the control implants. Bone activity levels decreased as a function of distance from the implant surface for all groups. No significant differences in BIC were observed between groups. Conclusions: This study showed that both surfaces were biocompatible and osteoconductive and that a time-dependent increase in osteoactivity occurred around the test implants.

AB - Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the bone response to a nanothickness bioceramic ion beam-assisted deposition (IBAD) on endosteal implants in a canine model. Materials and Methods: Alumina-blasted/acid-etched (control) and IBAD-modified (test) implants were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy + ion beam milling, thin-film mode X-ray diffraction, and atomic force microscope. The implants were surgically placed in four dogs' proximal tibiae and remained for 2 and 4 weeks in vivo. Oxytetracycline (10 mg/kg) was administered for bone labeling 48 hours prior to euthanization. Following euthanization, nondecalcified thin sections were prepared for UV and transmitted light microscopy. The amount of bone labeling was evaluated along the length and away from the implant surface by means of a computer software. The % bone-to-implant contact (BIC) was determined for each specimen. One-way analysis of variance at 95% level of significance along with Tukey's post hoc multiple comparisons were utilized for statistical evaluation. The characterization showed Ca- and P-based amorphous coatings with a 20- to 50-nm thickness. Results: In vivo results showed a significant increase in general and site-specific (to 0.5 mm from the implant surface) bone activity for the 4-week test implants compared with the control implants. Bone activity levels decreased as a function of distance from the implant surface for all groups. No significant differences in BIC were observed between groups. Conclusions: This study showed that both surfaces were biocompatible and osteoconductive and that a time-dependent increase in osteoactivity occurred around the test implants.

KW - Animal model

KW - Bioceramic

KW - Implant surface

KW - Nanothickness

KW - Osteoactivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449358447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449358447&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00122.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00122.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 18783412

AN - SCOPUS:70449358447

VL - 11

SP - 292

EP - 302

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 4

ER -