Hiatus resolution in American English: The case against glide insertion

Lisa Davidson, Daniel Erker

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    It has generally been assumed that after nonlow vowels in English, hiatus is resolved by inserting a homorganic glide (e.g. seeing [sijI], Itô & Mester 2009). However, despite suspicions that inserted glides may be fundamentally different from lexical glides (e.g. Cruttenden 2008), a systematic phonetic investigation of the purported glide is lacking. We examine the nature of hiatus resolution by comparing three environments: (i) vowel-vowel sequences within words (VV: kiosk), (ii) vowel-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VBV: see otters), and (iii) vowel-glide-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VGV: see yachts). The first finding is that a glottal stop produced between the vowels accounts for nearly half of the responses for VBV phrases, whereas glottal stops are present in less than 5% of the VV and the VGV conditions. Second, an acoustic comparison of VV, VBV, and VGV phrases not produced with glottal stops shows significant differences between the vowel-glide-vowel and the vowel-vowel sequences on all measures, including duration, intensity, and formants. These results indicate that American English speakers tend to resolve hiatus at word boundaries with glottal stop insertion, whereas there is no hiatus resolution at all within words. A brief optimality-theoretic analysis sketches out the phonological differences between hiatus at word boundaries and word-medially.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)482-514
    Number of pages33
    JournalLanguage
    Volume90
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    phonetics
    acoustics
    Insertion
    Hiatus
    Glide
    American English
    Glottal Stop
    Vowel Sequences

    Keywords

    • Acoustic analysis
    • American English
    • Glides
    • Glottal stops
    • Hiatus resolution

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Linguistics and Language
    • Language and Linguistics

    Cite this

    Hiatus resolution in American English : The case against glide insertion. / Davidson, Lisa; Erker, Daniel.

    In: Language, Vol. 90, No. 2, 2014, p. 482-514.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Davidson, Lisa ; Erker, Daniel. / Hiatus resolution in American English : The case against glide insertion. In: Language. 2014 ; Vol. 90, No. 2. pp. 482-514.
    @article{0353f5b7f89f424fa0fc22a23786038e,
    title = "Hiatus resolution in American English: The case against glide insertion",
    abstract = "It has generally been assumed that after nonlow vowels in English, hiatus is resolved by inserting a homorganic glide (e.g. seeing [sijI], It{\^o} & Mester 2009). However, despite suspicions that inserted glides may be fundamentally different from lexical glides (e.g. Cruttenden 2008), a systematic phonetic investigation of the purported glide is lacking. We examine the nature of hiatus resolution by comparing three environments: (i) vowel-vowel sequences within words (VV: kiosk), (ii) vowel-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VBV: see otters), and (iii) vowel-glide-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VGV: see yachts). The first finding is that a glottal stop produced between the vowels accounts for nearly half of the responses for VBV phrases, whereas glottal stops are present in less than 5{\%} of the VV and the VGV conditions. Second, an acoustic comparison of VV, VBV, and VGV phrases not produced with glottal stops shows significant differences between the vowel-glide-vowel and the vowel-vowel sequences on all measures, including duration, intensity, and formants. These results indicate that American English speakers tend to resolve hiatus at word boundaries with glottal stop insertion, whereas there is no hiatus resolution at all within words. A brief optimality-theoretic analysis sketches out the phonological differences between hiatus at word boundaries and word-medially.",
    keywords = "Acoustic analysis, American English, Glides, Glottal stops, Hiatus resolution",
    author = "Lisa Davidson and Daniel Erker",
    year = "2014",
    doi = "10.1353/lan.2014.0028",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "90",
    pages = "482--514",
    journal = "Language",
    issn = "0097-8507",
    publisher = "Linguistic Society of America",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Hiatus resolution in American English

    T2 - The case against glide insertion

    AU - Davidson, Lisa

    AU - Erker, Daniel

    PY - 2014

    Y1 - 2014

    N2 - It has generally been assumed that after nonlow vowels in English, hiatus is resolved by inserting a homorganic glide (e.g. seeing [sijI], Itô & Mester 2009). However, despite suspicions that inserted glides may be fundamentally different from lexical glides (e.g. Cruttenden 2008), a systematic phonetic investigation of the purported glide is lacking. We examine the nature of hiatus resolution by comparing three environments: (i) vowel-vowel sequences within words (VV: kiosk), (ii) vowel-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VBV: see otters), and (iii) vowel-glide-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VGV: see yachts). The first finding is that a glottal stop produced between the vowels accounts for nearly half of the responses for VBV phrases, whereas glottal stops are present in less than 5% of the VV and the VGV conditions. Second, an acoustic comparison of VV, VBV, and VGV phrases not produced with glottal stops shows significant differences between the vowel-glide-vowel and the vowel-vowel sequences on all measures, including duration, intensity, and formants. These results indicate that American English speakers tend to resolve hiatus at word boundaries with glottal stop insertion, whereas there is no hiatus resolution at all within words. A brief optimality-theoretic analysis sketches out the phonological differences between hiatus at word boundaries and word-medially.

    AB - It has generally been assumed that after nonlow vowels in English, hiatus is resolved by inserting a homorganic glide (e.g. seeing [sijI], Itô & Mester 2009). However, despite suspicions that inserted glides may be fundamentally different from lexical glides (e.g. Cruttenden 2008), a systematic phonetic investigation of the purported glide is lacking. We examine the nature of hiatus resolution by comparing three environments: (i) vowel-vowel sequences within words (VV: kiosk), (ii) vowel-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VBV: see otters), and (iii) vowel-glide-vowel sequences across word boundaries (VGV: see yachts). The first finding is that a glottal stop produced between the vowels accounts for nearly half of the responses for VBV phrases, whereas glottal stops are present in less than 5% of the VV and the VGV conditions. Second, an acoustic comparison of VV, VBV, and VGV phrases not produced with glottal stops shows significant differences between the vowel-glide-vowel and the vowel-vowel sequences on all measures, including duration, intensity, and formants. These results indicate that American English speakers tend to resolve hiatus at word boundaries with glottal stop insertion, whereas there is no hiatus resolution at all within words. A brief optimality-theoretic analysis sketches out the phonological differences between hiatus at word boundaries and word-medially.

    KW - Acoustic analysis

    KW - American English

    KW - Glides

    KW - Glottal stops

    KW - Hiatus resolution

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903219046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903219046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1353/lan.2014.0028

    DO - 10.1353/lan.2014.0028

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84903219046

    VL - 90

    SP - 482

    EP - 514

    JO - Language

    JF - Language

    SN - 0097-8507

    IS - 2

    ER -