Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier

Thomas Poestch, Paul Schmitt, Jay Chen, Barath Raghavan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

While the networking literature is replete with work on managing and operating networks-from the specifics of protocols to the design of management tools and architectures-there is comparatively little work on planning a network to be rolled out. In part this is because the task of network planning typically falls to carriers (for backbones) and cloud providers (for datacenters), which have the resources and the control to meet their specific needs. Here we consider network planning in situations that are quite different: resource poor and highly constrained. Frontier networks are often planned by lone operators, and while these networks are small in size, they are large in number: they individually serve relatively few users but in aggregate serve millions of users. The key challenge here is the mismatch between the resources of these small operators and the complexity of their network planning. In this paper we detail the difficulties in this context, building on our team's first-hand knowledge of many networks of this type. We then present our initial efforts at frontier network planning, discuss next steps, and outline several open problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery, Inc
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9781450346610
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 9 2016
Event15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets 2016 - Atlanta, United States
Duration: Nov 9 2016Nov 10 2016

Other

Other15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets 2016
CountryUnited States
CityAtlanta
Period11/9/1611/10/16

Fingerprint

Planning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Networks and Communications

Cite this

Poestch, T., Schmitt, P., Chen, J., & Raghavan, B. (2016). Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier. In HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (pp. 1-7). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3005745.3005757

Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier. / Poestch, Thomas; Schmitt, Paul; Chen, Jay; Raghavan, Barath.

HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2016. p. 1-7.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Poestch, T, Schmitt, P, Chen, J & Raghavan, B 2016, Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier. in HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, pp. 1-7, 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, HotNets 2016, Atlanta, United States, 11/9/16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3005745.3005757
Poestch T, Schmitt P, Chen J, Raghavan B. Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier. In HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. 2016. p. 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1145/3005745.3005757
Poestch, Thomas ; Schmitt, Paul ; Chen, Jay ; Raghavan, Barath. / Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier. HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 2016. pp. 1-7
@inproceedings{f206de1ba0e347b6b363202044b4ddbc,
title = "Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier",
abstract = "While the networking literature is replete with work on managing and operating networks-from the specifics of protocols to the design of management tools and architectures-there is comparatively little work on planning a network to be rolled out. In part this is because the task of network planning typically falls to carriers (for backbones) and cloud providers (for datacenters), which have the resources and the control to meet their specific needs. Here we consider network planning in situations that are quite different: resource poor and highly constrained. Frontier networks are often planned by lone operators, and while these networks are small in size, they are large in number: they individually serve relatively few users but in aggregate serve millions of users. The key challenge here is the mismatch between the resources of these small operators and the complexity of their network planning. In this paper we detail the difficulties in this context, building on our team's first-hand knowledge of many networks of this type. We then present our initial efforts at frontier network planning, discuss next steps, and outline several open problems.",
author = "Thomas Poestch and Paul Schmitt and Jay Chen and Barath Raghavan",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1145/3005745.3005757",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
booktitle = "HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery, Inc",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Helping the lone operator in the vast frontier

AU - Poestch, Thomas

AU - Schmitt, Paul

AU - Chen, Jay

AU - Raghavan, Barath

PY - 2016/11/9

Y1 - 2016/11/9

N2 - While the networking literature is replete with work on managing and operating networks-from the specifics of protocols to the design of management tools and architectures-there is comparatively little work on planning a network to be rolled out. In part this is because the task of network planning typically falls to carriers (for backbones) and cloud providers (for datacenters), which have the resources and the control to meet their specific needs. Here we consider network planning in situations that are quite different: resource poor and highly constrained. Frontier networks are often planned by lone operators, and while these networks are small in size, they are large in number: they individually serve relatively few users but in aggregate serve millions of users. The key challenge here is the mismatch between the resources of these small operators and the complexity of their network planning. In this paper we detail the difficulties in this context, building on our team's first-hand knowledge of many networks of this type. We then present our initial efforts at frontier network planning, discuss next steps, and outline several open problems.

AB - While the networking literature is replete with work on managing and operating networks-from the specifics of protocols to the design of management tools and architectures-there is comparatively little work on planning a network to be rolled out. In part this is because the task of network planning typically falls to carriers (for backbones) and cloud providers (for datacenters), which have the resources and the control to meet their specific needs. Here we consider network planning in situations that are quite different: resource poor and highly constrained. Frontier networks are often planned by lone operators, and while these networks are small in size, they are large in number: they individually serve relatively few users but in aggregate serve millions of users. The key challenge here is the mismatch between the resources of these small operators and the complexity of their network planning. In this paper we detail the difficulties in this context, building on our team's first-hand knowledge of many networks of this type. We then present our initial efforts at frontier network planning, discuss next steps, and outline several open problems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002061867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002061867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1145/3005745.3005757

DO - 10.1145/3005745.3005757

M3 - Conference contribution

SP - 1

EP - 7

BT - HotNets 2016 - Proceedings of the 15th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks

PB - Association for Computing Machinery, Inc

ER -