Abstract
We compare three eligibility criteria for targeting health insurance expansions in working families: poverty, hourly wages, and employment in a small firm. Making pairwise comparisons among these, we find that targeting by poverty is the most effective and efficient. A poverty-based method is also the most effective way to target those lacking access to employer-sponsored insurance and those with low take-up of such coverage. When we examine the effectiveness of targeting by family type, we find that marital status and number of workers in the family make little difference once we control for the presence of children and for poverty level.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 246-254 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Health Affairs |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2002 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nursing(all)
- Health(social science)
- Health Professions(all)
- Health Policy
Cite this
Health insurance expansions for working families : A comparison of targeting strategies. / Ferry, Danielle H.; Garrett, Bowen; Glied, Sharon; Greenman, Emily K.; Nichols, Len M.
In: Health Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2002, p. 246-254.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Health insurance expansions for working families
T2 - A comparison of targeting strategies
AU - Ferry, Danielle H.
AU - Garrett, Bowen
AU - Glied, Sharon
AU - Greenman, Emily K.
AU - Nichols, Len M.
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - We compare three eligibility criteria for targeting health insurance expansions in working families: poverty, hourly wages, and employment in a small firm. Making pairwise comparisons among these, we find that targeting by poverty is the most effective and efficient. A poverty-based method is also the most effective way to target those lacking access to employer-sponsored insurance and those with low take-up of such coverage. When we examine the effectiveness of targeting by family type, we find that marital status and number of workers in the family make little difference once we control for the presence of children and for poverty level.
AB - We compare three eligibility criteria for targeting health insurance expansions in working families: poverty, hourly wages, and employment in a small firm. Making pairwise comparisons among these, we find that targeting by poverty is the most effective and efficient. A poverty-based method is also the most effective way to target those lacking access to employer-sponsored insurance and those with low take-up of such coverage. When we examine the effectiveness of targeting by family type, we find that marital status and number of workers in the family make little difference once we control for the presence of children and for poverty level.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036636874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036636874&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.246
DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.21.4.246
M3 - Article
C2 - 12117137
AN - SCOPUS:0036636874
VL - 21
SP - 246
EP - 254
JO - Health Affairs
JF - Health Affairs
SN - 0278-2715
IS - 4
ER -