Hate Welfare But Help the Poor: How the Attributional Content of Stereotypes Explains the Paradox of Reactions to the Destitute in America

Pj Henry, Christine Reyna, Bernard Weiner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Social scientists have documented more negative reactions to the concept of welfare versus the concept of poor, despite the fact that both labels can be used almost interchangeably in current political discussions. We believe that the most proximal explanation rests in the different attributional information contained within the stereotypes of welfare recipients versus poor people. Three studies were conducted to test this idea. The results suggest that the attributional content within stereotypes of welfare recipients, particularly their greater responsibility for their impoverished state compared with poor people, most influences the public's more negative reaction to welfare. The results are discussed in terms of how the rhetoric of stereotypes may be exploited in the political domain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)34-58
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

Hate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Hate Welfare But Help the Poor : How the Attributional Content of Stereotypes Explains the Paradox of Reactions to the Destitute in America. / Henry, Pj; Reyna, Christine; Weiner, Bernard.

In: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 34-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8b71e648683e4781ae51d63c2293b8dd,
title = "Hate Welfare But Help the Poor: How the Attributional Content of Stereotypes Explains the Paradox of Reactions to the Destitute in America",
abstract = "Social scientists have documented more negative reactions to the concept of welfare versus the concept of poor, despite the fact that both labels can be used almost interchangeably in current political discussions. We believe that the most proximal explanation rests in the different attributional information contained within the stereotypes of welfare recipients versus poor people. Three studies were conducted to test this idea. The results suggest that the attributional content within stereotypes of welfare recipients, particularly their greater responsibility for their impoverished state compared with poor people, most influences the public's more negative reaction to welfare. The results are discussed in terms of how the rhetoric of stereotypes may be exploited in the political domain.",
author = "Pj Henry and Christine Reyna and Bernard Weiner",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02536.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "34--58",
journal = "Journal of Applied Social Psychology",
issn = "0021-9029",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hate Welfare But Help the Poor

T2 - How the Attributional Content of Stereotypes Explains the Paradox of Reactions to the Destitute in America

AU - Henry, Pj

AU - Reyna, Christine

AU - Weiner, Bernard

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Social scientists have documented more negative reactions to the concept of welfare versus the concept of poor, despite the fact that both labels can be used almost interchangeably in current political discussions. We believe that the most proximal explanation rests in the different attributional information contained within the stereotypes of welfare recipients versus poor people. Three studies were conducted to test this idea. The results suggest that the attributional content within stereotypes of welfare recipients, particularly their greater responsibility for their impoverished state compared with poor people, most influences the public's more negative reaction to welfare. The results are discussed in terms of how the rhetoric of stereotypes may be exploited in the political domain.

AB - Social scientists have documented more negative reactions to the concept of welfare versus the concept of poor, despite the fact that both labels can be used almost interchangeably in current political discussions. We believe that the most proximal explanation rests in the different attributional information contained within the stereotypes of welfare recipients versus poor people. Three studies were conducted to test this idea. The results suggest that the attributional content within stereotypes of welfare recipients, particularly their greater responsibility for their impoverished state compared with poor people, most influences the public's more negative reaction to welfare. The results are discussed in terms of how the rhetoric of stereotypes may be exploited in the political domain.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642349858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642349858&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02536.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02536.x

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:1642349858

VL - 34

SP - 34

EP - 58

JO - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Social Psychology

SN - 0021-9029

IS - 1

ER -