"Hassles" in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Life Stress Variables

Bruce P. Dohrenwend, Patrick Shrout

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In a recent study, we found evidence that items in several leading stress measures, including the Hassles Scale developed by Lazarus and his colleagues, are confounded with measures of psychological distress. Lazarus, DeLongis, Folkman, and Gruen disagree with our conclusions about the Hassles Scale and present additional data indicating that their measure is not confounded. They also argue in more general terms that our theoretical and methodological approach is a misguided quest for rigor. By way of rebuttal, we present further analyses of their own data and compare our theoretical approach to theirs. On the matter of confounding, we conclude that the Hassles Scale is even more confounded than we had originally supposed. With regard to the theoretical issue, we believe that a rapprochement would be both feasible and useful.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)780-785
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Psychologist
Volume40
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1985

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

"Hassles" in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Life Stress Variables. / Dohrenwend, Bruce P.; Shrout, Patrick.

In: American Psychologist, Vol. 40, No. 7, 07.1985, p. 780-785.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4726af242d9844adb808a52a2067f0ce,
title = "{"}Hassles{"} in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Life Stress Variables",
abstract = "In a recent study, we found evidence that items in several leading stress measures, including the Hassles Scale developed by Lazarus and his colleagues, are confounded with measures of psychological distress. Lazarus, DeLongis, Folkman, and Gruen disagree with our conclusions about the Hassles Scale and present additional data indicating that their measure is not confounded. They also argue in more general terms that our theoretical and methodological approach is a misguided quest for rigor. By way of rebuttal, we present further analyses of their own data and compare our theoretical approach to theirs. On the matter of confounding, we conclude that the Hassles Scale is even more confounded than we had originally supposed. With regard to the theoretical issue, we believe that a rapprochement would be both feasible and useful.",
author = "Dohrenwend, {Bruce P.} and Patrick Shrout",
year = "1985",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.780",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "780--785",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Hassles" in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Life Stress Variables

AU - Dohrenwend, Bruce P.

AU - Shrout, Patrick

PY - 1985/7

Y1 - 1985/7

N2 - In a recent study, we found evidence that items in several leading stress measures, including the Hassles Scale developed by Lazarus and his colleagues, are confounded with measures of psychological distress. Lazarus, DeLongis, Folkman, and Gruen disagree with our conclusions about the Hassles Scale and present additional data indicating that their measure is not confounded. They also argue in more general terms that our theoretical and methodological approach is a misguided quest for rigor. By way of rebuttal, we present further analyses of their own data and compare our theoretical approach to theirs. On the matter of confounding, we conclude that the Hassles Scale is even more confounded than we had originally supposed. With regard to the theoretical issue, we believe that a rapprochement would be both feasible and useful.

AB - In a recent study, we found evidence that items in several leading stress measures, including the Hassles Scale developed by Lazarus and his colleagues, are confounded with measures of psychological distress. Lazarus, DeLongis, Folkman, and Gruen disagree with our conclusions about the Hassles Scale and present additional data indicating that their measure is not confounded. They also argue in more general terms that our theoretical and methodological approach is a misguided quest for rigor. By way of rebuttal, we present further analyses of their own data and compare our theoretical approach to theirs. On the matter of confounding, we conclude that the Hassles Scale is even more confounded than we had originally supposed. With regard to the theoretical issue, we believe that a rapprochement would be both feasible and useful.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001206941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001206941&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.780

DO - 10.1037/0003-066X.40.7.780

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001206941

VL - 40

SP - 780

EP - 785

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

IS - 7

ER -