Group-Based Dominance and Authoritarian Aggression Predict Support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Jake Womick, Tobias Rothmund, Flavio Azevedo, Laura A. King, John Jost

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In three convenience samples (combined N = 3,755) and one nationally representative survey (N = 1,500), we investigated whether and how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) were associated with support for Donald Trump during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In all samples, facets of RWA and SDO predicted support for Trump (compared to other Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian candidates), even after adjusting for demographic factors and religious affiliation. In comparison with supporters of other Republican candidates, Trump supporters were consistently higher in group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression (but not submission or conventionalism). These results highlight the real-world significance of psychological theories and constructs and establish that Trump voters were uniquely driven by the desire to dominate out-group members in an aggressive manner.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Authoritarianism
Social Dominance
Aggression
Psychological Theory
Demography

Keywords

  • authoritarianism
  • political ideology
  • social dominance orientation
  • voting behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Group-Based Dominance and Authoritarian Aggression Predict Support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. / Womick, Jake; Rothmund, Tobias; Azevedo, Flavio; King, Laura A.; Jost, John.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41db917550d94319a551dccf5b3eb1d1,
title = "Group-Based Dominance and Authoritarian Aggression Predict Support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election",
abstract = "In three convenience samples (combined N = 3,755) and one nationally representative survey (N = 1,500), we investigated whether and how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) were associated with support for Donald Trump during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In all samples, facets of RWA and SDO predicted support for Trump (compared to other Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian candidates), even after adjusting for demographic factors and religious affiliation. In comparison with supporters of other Republican candidates, Trump supporters were consistently higher in group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression (but not submission or conventionalism). These results highlight the real-world significance of psychological theories and constructs and establish that Trump voters were uniquely driven by the desire to dominate out-group members in an aggressive manner.",
keywords = "authoritarianism, political ideology, social dominance orientation, voting behavior",
author = "Jake Womick and Tobias Rothmund and Flavio Azevedo and King, {Laura A.} and John Jost",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1948550618778290",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Group-Based Dominance and Authoritarian Aggression Predict Support for Donald Trump in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election

AU - Womick, Jake

AU - Rothmund, Tobias

AU - Azevedo, Flavio

AU - King, Laura A.

AU - Jost, John

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - In three convenience samples (combined N = 3,755) and one nationally representative survey (N = 1,500), we investigated whether and how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) were associated with support for Donald Trump during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In all samples, facets of RWA and SDO predicted support for Trump (compared to other Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian candidates), even after adjusting for demographic factors and religious affiliation. In comparison with supporters of other Republican candidates, Trump supporters were consistently higher in group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression (but not submission or conventionalism). These results highlight the real-world significance of psychological theories and constructs and establish that Trump voters were uniquely driven by the desire to dominate out-group members in an aggressive manner.

AB - In three convenience samples (combined N = 3,755) and one nationally representative survey (N = 1,500), we investigated whether and how right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and social dominance orientation (SDO) were associated with support for Donald Trump during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. In all samples, facets of RWA and SDO predicted support for Trump (compared to other Republican, Democratic, and Libertarian candidates), even after adjusting for demographic factors and religious affiliation. In comparison with supporters of other Republican candidates, Trump supporters were consistently higher in group-based dominance and authoritarian aggression (but not submission or conventionalism). These results highlight the real-world significance of psychological theories and constructs and establish that Trump voters were uniquely driven by the desire to dominate out-group members in an aggressive manner.

KW - authoritarianism

KW - political ideology

KW - social dominance orientation

KW - voting behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048998442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048998442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550618778290

DO - 10.1177/1948550618778290

M3 - Article

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

ER -