Green infrastructure financing as an imperative to achieve green goals

Rae Zimmerman, Ryan Brenner, Jimena Llopis Abella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Green infrastructure (GI) has increasingly gained popularity for achieving adaptation and mitigation goals associated with climate change and extreme weather events. To continue implementing GI, financial tools are needed for upfront project capital or development costs and later for maintenance. This study's purpose is to evaluate financing tools used in a selected GI dataset and to assess how those tools are linked to various GI technologies and other GI project characteristics like cost and size. The dataset includes over 400 GI U.S. projects, comprising a convenience sample, from the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). GI project characteristics were organized to answer a number of research questions using descriptive statistics. Results indicated that the number of projects and overall cost shares were mostly located in a few states. Grants were the most common financial tool with about two-thirds of the projects reporting information on financial tools receiving grant funding. Most projects reported financing from only one tool with a maximum of three tools. Projects primarily included multiple GI technologies averaging three and a maximum of nine. The most common GI technologies were bioswales, retention, rain gardens, and porous pavements. These findings are useful for decision-makers evaluating funding support for GI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number39
JournalClimate
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

infrastructure
financing
cost
project
pavement
garden
mitigation
weather
climate change

Keywords

  • Climate mitigation and adaptation
  • Co-benefits
  • Financial sources
  • Green infrastructure finance
  • Green infrastructure project costs
  • Private finance
  • Public finance
  • Stormwater management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Green infrastructure financing as an imperative to achieve green goals. / Zimmerman, Rae; Brenner, Ryan; Abella, Jimena Llopis.

In: Climate, Vol. 7, No. 3, 39, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zimmerman, Rae ; Brenner, Ryan ; Abella, Jimena Llopis. / Green infrastructure financing as an imperative to achieve green goals. In: Climate. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. 3.
@article{b9f6a11222874bdcb9e009c924bd2334,
title = "Green infrastructure financing as an imperative to achieve green goals",
abstract = "Green infrastructure (GI) has increasingly gained popularity for achieving adaptation and mitigation goals associated with climate change and extreme weather events. To continue implementing GI, financial tools are needed for upfront project capital or development costs and later for maintenance. This study's purpose is to evaluate financing tools used in a selected GI dataset and to assess how those tools are linked to various GI technologies and other GI project characteristics like cost and size. The dataset includes over 400 GI U.S. projects, comprising a convenience sample, from the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). GI project characteristics were organized to answer a number of research questions using descriptive statistics. Results indicated that the number of projects and overall cost shares were mostly located in a few states. Grants were the most common financial tool with about two-thirds of the projects reporting information on financial tools receiving grant funding. Most projects reported financing from only one tool with a maximum of three tools. Projects primarily included multiple GI technologies averaging three and a maximum of nine. The most common GI technologies were bioswales, retention, rain gardens, and porous pavements. These findings are useful for decision-makers evaluating funding support for GI.",
keywords = "Climate mitigation and adaptation, Co-benefits, Financial sources, Green infrastructure finance, Green infrastructure project costs, Private finance, Public finance, Stormwater management",
author = "Rae Zimmerman and Ryan Brenner and Abella, {Jimena Llopis}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/cli7030039",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Climate",
issn = "2225-1154",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Green infrastructure financing as an imperative to achieve green goals

AU - Zimmerman, Rae

AU - Brenner, Ryan

AU - Abella, Jimena Llopis

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Green infrastructure (GI) has increasingly gained popularity for achieving adaptation and mitigation goals associated with climate change and extreme weather events. To continue implementing GI, financial tools are needed for upfront project capital or development costs and later for maintenance. This study's purpose is to evaluate financing tools used in a selected GI dataset and to assess how those tools are linked to various GI technologies and other GI project characteristics like cost and size. The dataset includes over 400 GI U.S. projects, comprising a convenience sample, from the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). GI project characteristics were organized to answer a number of research questions using descriptive statistics. Results indicated that the number of projects and overall cost shares were mostly located in a few states. Grants were the most common financial tool with about two-thirds of the projects reporting information on financial tools receiving grant funding. Most projects reported financing from only one tool with a maximum of three tools. Projects primarily included multiple GI technologies averaging three and a maximum of nine. The most common GI technologies were bioswales, retention, rain gardens, and porous pavements. These findings are useful for decision-makers evaluating funding support for GI.

AB - Green infrastructure (GI) has increasingly gained popularity for achieving adaptation and mitigation goals associated with climate change and extreme weather events. To continue implementing GI, financial tools are needed for upfront project capital or development costs and later for maintenance. This study's purpose is to evaluate financing tools used in a selected GI dataset and to assess how those tools are linked to various GI technologies and other GI project characteristics like cost and size. The dataset includes over 400 GI U.S. projects, comprising a convenience sample, from the American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA). GI project characteristics were organized to answer a number of research questions using descriptive statistics. Results indicated that the number of projects and overall cost shares were mostly located in a few states. Grants were the most common financial tool with about two-thirds of the projects reporting information on financial tools receiving grant funding. Most projects reported financing from only one tool with a maximum of three tools. Projects primarily included multiple GI technologies averaging three and a maximum of nine. The most common GI technologies were bioswales, retention, rain gardens, and porous pavements. These findings are useful for decision-makers evaluating funding support for GI.

KW - Climate mitigation and adaptation

KW - Co-benefits

KW - Financial sources

KW - Green infrastructure finance

KW - Green infrastructure project costs

KW - Private finance

KW - Public finance

KW - Stormwater management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063780132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063780132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/cli7030039

DO - 10.3390/cli7030039

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063780132

VL - 7

JO - Climate

JF - Climate

SN - 2225-1154

IS - 3

M1 - 39

ER -