Good policy or good luck?

William Easterly, Michael Kremer, Lant Pritchett, Lawrence H. Summers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Much of the new growth literature stresses country characteristics, such as education levels or political stability, as the dominant determinant of growth. However, growth rates are highly unstable over time, with a correlation across decades of 0.1 to 0.3, while country characteristics are stable, with cross-decade correlations of 0.6 to 0.9. Shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining variance in growth. These findings suggest either that shocks are important relative to country characteristics in determining long-run growth, or that worldwide technological change determines long-run growth while country characteristics determine relative income levels.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)459-483
    Number of pages25
    JournalJournal of Monetary Economics
    Volume32
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1993

    Fingerprint

    Luck
    Long-run growth
    Relative income
    Political stability
    Terms of trade
    Technological change
    Education
    Income level

    Keywords

    • Economic growth

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Finance

    Cite this

    Easterly, W., Kremer, M., Pritchett, L., & Summers, L. H. (1993). Good policy or good luck? Journal of Monetary Economics, 32(3), 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90026-C

    Good policy or good luck? / Easterly, William; Kremer, Michael; Pritchett, Lant; Summers, Lawrence H.

    In: Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 1993, p. 459-483.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Easterly, W, Kremer, M, Pritchett, L & Summers, LH 1993, 'Good policy or good luck?', Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90026-C
    Easterly W, Kremer M, Pritchett L, Summers LH. Good policy or good luck? Journal of Monetary Economics. 1993;32(3):459-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(93)90026-C
    Easterly, William ; Kremer, Michael ; Pritchett, Lant ; Summers, Lawrence H. / Good policy or good luck?. In: Journal of Monetary Economics. 1993 ; Vol. 32, No. 3. pp. 459-483.
    @article{6d65275cdab147d99b2a69eedcf4fd34,
    title = "Good policy or good luck?",
    abstract = "Much of the new growth literature stresses country characteristics, such as education levels or political stability, as the dominant determinant of growth. However, growth rates are highly unstable over time, with a correlation across decades of 0.1 to 0.3, while country characteristics are stable, with cross-decade correlations of 0.6 to 0.9. Shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining variance in growth. These findings suggest either that shocks are important relative to country characteristics in determining long-run growth, or that worldwide technological change determines long-run growth while country characteristics determine relative income levels.",
    keywords = "Economic growth",
    author = "William Easterly and Michael Kremer and Lant Pritchett and Summers, {Lawrence H.}",
    year = "1993",
    doi = "10.1016/0304-3932(93)90026-C",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "32",
    pages = "459--483",
    journal = "Journal of Monetary Economics",
    issn = "0304-3932",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Good policy or good luck?

    AU - Easterly, William

    AU - Kremer, Michael

    AU - Pritchett, Lant

    AU - Summers, Lawrence H.

    PY - 1993

    Y1 - 1993

    N2 - Much of the new growth literature stresses country characteristics, such as education levels or political stability, as the dominant determinant of growth. However, growth rates are highly unstable over time, with a correlation across decades of 0.1 to 0.3, while country characteristics are stable, with cross-decade correlations of 0.6 to 0.9. Shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining variance in growth. These findings suggest either that shocks are important relative to country characteristics in determining long-run growth, or that worldwide technological change determines long-run growth while country characteristics determine relative income levels.

    AB - Much of the new growth literature stresses country characteristics, such as education levels or political stability, as the dominant determinant of growth. However, growth rates are highly unstable over time, with a correlation across decades of 0.1 to 0.3, while country characteristics are stable, with cross-decade correlations of 0.6 to 0.9. Shocks, especially those to terms of trade, play a large role in explaining variance in growth. These findings suggest either that shocks are important relative to country characteristics in determining long-run growth, or that worldwide technological change determines long-run growth while country characteristics determine relative income levels.

    KW - Economic growth

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8344287983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8344287983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/0304-3932(93)90026-C

    DO - 10.1016/0304-3932(93)90026-C

    M3 - Article

    VL - 32

    SP - 459

    EP - 483

    JO - Journal of Monetary Economics

    JF - Journal of Monetary Economics

    SN - 0304-3932

    IS - 3

    ER -