God and the Government

Testing a Compensatory Control Mechanism for the Support of External Systems

Aaron C. Kay, Danielle Gaucher, Jaime Napier, Mitchell J. Callan, Kristin Laurin

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The authors propose that the high levels of support often observed for governmental and religious systems can be explained, in part, as a means of coping with the threat posed by chronically or situationally fluctuating levels of perceived personal control. Three experiments demonstrated a causal relation between lowered perceptions of personal control and the defense of external systems, including increased beliefs in the existence of a controlling God (Studies 1 and 2) and defense of the overarching socio-political system (Study 4). A 4th experiment (Study 5) showed the converse to be true: A challenge to the usefulness of external systems of control led to increased illusory perceptions of personal control. In addition, a cross-national data set demonstrated that lower levels of personal control are associated with higher support for governmental control (across 67 nations; Study 3). Each study identified theoretically consistent moderators and mediators of these effects. The implications of these results for understanding why a high percentage of the population believes in the existence of God, and why people so often endorse and justify their socio-political systems, are discussed.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)18-35
    Number of pages18
    JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
    Volume95
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 1 2008

    Fingerprint

    Political Systems
    god
    political system
    Population
    experiment
    moderator
    coping
    threat

    Keywords

    • control
    • God
    • governmental support
    • religion
    • system justification

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    God and the Government : Testing a Compensatory Control Mechanism for the Support of External Systems. / Kay, Aaron C.; Gaucher, Danielle; Napier, Jaime; Callan, Mitchell J.; Laurin, Kristin.

    In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 95, No. 1, 01.07.2008, p. 18-35.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Kay, Aaron C. ; Gaucher, Danielle ; Napier, Jaime ; Callan, Mitchell J. ; Laurin, Kristin. / God and the Government : Testing a Compensatory Control Mechanism for the Support of External Systems. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 95, No. 1. pp. 18-35.
    @article{c0f7195de6bc4b3fa7d417b2dadec030,
    title = "God and the Government: Testing a Compensatory Control Mechanism for the Support of External Systems",
    abstract = "The authors propose that the high levels of support often observed for governmental and religious systems can be explained, in part, as a means of coping with the threat posed by chronically or situationally fluctuating levels of perceived personal control. Three experiments demonstrated a causal relation between lowered perceptions of personal control and the defense of external systems, including increased beliefs in the existence of a controlling God (Studies 1 and 2) and defense of the overarching socio-political system (Study 4). A 4th experiment (Study 5) showed the converse to be true: A challenge to the usefulness of external systems of control led to increased illusory perceptions of personal control. In addition, a cross-national data set demonstrated that lower levels of personal control are associated with higher support for governmental control (across 67 nations; Study 3). Each study identified theoretically consistent moderators and mediators of these effects. The implications of these results for understanding why a high percentage of the population believes in the existence of God, and why people so often endorse and justify their socio-political systems, are discussed.",
    keywords = "control, God, governmental support, religion, system justification",
    author = "Kay, {Aaron C.} and Danielle Gaucher and Jaime Napier and Callan, {Mitchell J.} and Kristin Laurin",
    year = "2008",
    month = "7",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "95",
    pages = "18--35",
    journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
    issn = "0022-3514",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - God and the Government

    T2 - Testing a Compensatory Control Mechanism for the Support of External Systems

    AU - Kay, Aaron C.

    AU - Gaucher, Danielle

    AU - Napier, Jaime

    AU - Callan, Mitchell J.

    AU - Laurin, Kristin

    PY - 2008/7/1

    Y1 - 2008/7/1

    N2 - The authors propose that the high levels of support often observed for governmental and religious systems can be explained, in part, as a means of coping with the threat posed by chronically or situationally fluctuating levels of perceived personal control. Three experiments demonstrated a causal relation between lowered perceptions of personal control and the defense of external systems, including increased beliefs in the existence of a controlling God (Studies 1 and 2) and defense of the overarching socio-political system (Study 4). A 4th experiment (Study 5) showed the converse to be true: A challenge to the usefulness of external systems of control led to increased illusory perceptions of personal control. In addition, a cross-national data set demonstrated that lower levels of personal control are associated with higher support for governmental control (across 67 nations; Study 3). Each study identified theoretically consistent moderators and mediators of these effects. The implications of these results for understanding why a high percentage of the population believes in the existence of God, and why people so often endorse and justify their socio-political systems, are discussed.

    AB - The authors propose that the high levels of support often observed for governmental and religious systems can be explained, in part, as a means of coping with the threat posed by chronically or situationally fluctuating levels of perceived personal control. Three experiments demonstrated a causal relation between lowered perceptions of personal control and the defense of external systems, including increased beliefs in the existence of a controlling God (Studies 1 and 2) and defense of the overarching socio-political system (Study 4). A 4th experiment (Study 5) showed the converse to be true: A challenge to the usefulness of external systems of control led to increased illusory perceptions of personal control. In addition, a cross-national data set demonstrated that lower levels of personal control are associated with higher support for governmental control (across 67 nations; Study 3). Each study identified theoretically consistent moderators and mediators of these effects. The implications of these results for understanding why a high percentage of the population believes in the existence of God, and why people so often endorse and justify their socio-political systems, are discussed.

    KW - control

    KW - God

    KW - governmental support

    KW - religion

    KW - system justification

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47249124570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47249124570&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18

    DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.18

    M3 - Article

    VL - 95

    SP - 18

    EP - 35

    JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    SN - 0022-3514

    IS - 1

    ER -