Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants – equally effective?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Data sources Studies were sourced using Biomed Central, Cochrane Oral Health Reviews, the Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, Expanded ASAP Plus, the MetaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com/), Medline (PubMed) Science-Direct, Research Findings Electronic Register, and BBO/LILACS.Study selectionClinical trials and systematic reviews relevant to the review objective published in English, German, Portuguese or Spanish were included after independent review by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and quality assessment was undertaken independently in duplicate by two reviewers. The outcome measure for the caries preventive effect was caries-absence on sealed teeth. A meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsOut of 25 selected studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria (eight were trials and three were systematic reviews) with six of these being included in a meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.49), indicating no difference in the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and resin-based fissure sealant material.ConclusionsGIC and resin-based sealants exhibited significant caries-preventive effects. This review found no evidence that either material was superior to the other in the prevention of caries. Therefore both materials appear to be equally suitable as fissure sealant materials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)10
Number of pages1
JournalEvidence-Based Dentistry
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Pit and Fissure Sealants
Meta-Analysis
Glass Ionomer Cements
Directories
Information Storage and Retrieval
Oral Health
PubMed
Libraries
Tooth
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals
Research
glass ionomer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants – equally effective? / Niederman, Richard.

In: Evidence-Based Dentistry, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2010, p. 10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c80a5b6cfa174c0e9024e4d6148e67ad,
title = "Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants – equally effective?",
abstract = "Data sources Studies were sourced using Biomed Central, Cochrane Oral Health Reviews, the Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, Expanded ASAP Plus, the MetaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com/), Medline (PubMed) Science-Direct, Research Findings Electronic Register, and BBO/LILACS.Study selectionClinical trials and systematic reviews relevant to the review objective published in English, German, Portuguese or Spanish were included after independent review by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and quality assessment was undertaken independently in duplicate by two reviewers. The outcome measure for the caries preventive effect was caries-absence on sealed teeth. A meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsOut of 25 selected studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria (eight were trials and three were systematic reviews) with six of these being included in a meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 0.96 (95{\%} confidence interval, 0.62–1.49), indicating no difference in the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and resin-based fissure sealant material.ConclusionsGIC and resin-based sealants exhibited significant caries-preventive effects. This review found no evidence that either material was superior to the other in the prevention of caries. Therefore both materials appear to be equally suitable as fissure sealant materials.",
author = "Richard Niederman",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ebd.6400700",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "10",
journal = "Evidence-Based Dentistry",
issn = "1462-0049",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants – equally effective?

AU - Niederman, Richard

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Data sources Studies were sourced using Biomed Central, Cochrane Oral Health Reviews, the Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, Expanded ASAP Plus, the MetaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com/), Medline (PubMed) Science-Direct, Research Findings Electronic Register, and BBO/LILACS.Study selectionClinical trials and systematic reviews relevant to the review objective published in English, German, Portuguese or Spanish were included after independent review by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and quality assessment was undertaken independently in duplicate by two reviewers. The outcome measure for the caries preventive effect was caries-absence on sealed teeth. A meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsOut of 25 selected studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria (eight were trials and three were systematic reviews) with six of these being included in a meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.49), indicating no difference in the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and resin-based fissure sealant material.ConclusionsGIC and resin-based sealants exhibited significant caries-preventive effects. This review found no evidence that either material was superior to the other in the prevention of caries. Therefore both materials appear to be equally suitable as fissure sealant materials.

AB - Data sources Studies were sourced using Biomed Central, Cochrane Oral Health Reviews, the Cochrane Library, Directory of Open Access Journals, Expanded ASAP Plus, the MetaRegister of Controlled Trials (www.controlled-trials.com/), Medline (PubMed) Science-Direct, Research Findings Electronic Register, and BBO/LILACS.Study selectionClinical trials and systematic reviews relevant to the review objective published in English, German, Portuguese or Spanish were included after independent review by two reviewers; disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus.Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and quality assessment was undertaken independently in duplicate by two reviewers. The outcome measure for the caries preventive effect was caries-absence on sealed teeth. A meta-analysis was conducted.ResultsOut of 25 selected studies, 11 met the inclusion criteria (eight were trials and three were systematic reviews) with six of these being included in a meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.62–1.49), indicating no difference in the caries-preventive effect of glass ionomer cements (GIC) and resin-based fissure sealant material.ConclusionsGIC and resin-based sealants exhibited significant caries-preventive effects. This review found no evidence that either material was superior to the other in the prevention of caries. Therefore both materials appear to be equally suitable as fissure sealant materials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84984768727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84984768727&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400700

DO - 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400700

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 10

JO - Evidence-Based Dentistry

JF - Evidence-Based Dentistry

SN - 1462-0049

IS - 1

ER -