Geometric mouse variation: Implications to the axial ulnar loading protocol and animal specific calibration

David W. Wagner, Stephanie Chan, Alesha Castillo, Gary S. Beaupre

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Large variations in axial ulnar load strain calibration results suggest that animal-specific calibrations may be necessary. However, the optimal set of geometric measures for performing an animal-specific calibration are not known, potentially as a result of confounding effects associated with experimentally introduced variation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the inherent variability of ulnar geometric measures known to influence periosteal midshaft strain during axial ulnar exogenous loading, and to further quantify the relationship between the variance of those geometric measures and periosteal strain during axial loading. Thirty-nine right mouse forelimbs were scanned with microCT. Seven geometric measures that influence periosteal strain resulting from a combined axial and bending loading were computed and used to estimate animal-specific strains on the periosteal midshaft. Animal specific strains were estimated using a theoretical model based on the generalized flexure formula. The predicted mean and standard deviation of the simulated midshaft strain gauge measurement resulting from the inter-animal geometric differences was -985±148με/N. The complete beam bending term associated with bending about the Imin axis accounted for 89% of the variance and reduced the residual RMSE to 50.4με. Eccentricity associated with the axial loading contributed a substantial portion of variation to the computed strain suggesting that calibration procedures to account for animal differences should incorporate that variable. The method developed in this study provides a relatively simple procedure for computing animal-specific strains using microCT scan data, without the need of a load/strain calibration study or computationally intensive finite element models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2271-2276
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Volume46
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 3 2013

Fingerprint

Weight-Bearing
Calibration
Animals
X-Ray Microtomography
Forelimb
Axial loads
Strain gages
Theoretical Models
Loads (forces)

Keywords

  • Axial ulnar loading
  • Load/strain calibration
  • MicroCT
  • Mouse model

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Cite this

Geometric mouse variation : Implications to the axial ulnar loading protocol and animal specific calibration. / Wagner, David W.; Chan, Stephanie; Castillo, Alesha; Beaupre, Gary S.

In: Journal of Biomechanics, Vol. 46, No. 13, 03.09.2013, p. 2271-2276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wagner, David W. ; Chan, Stephanie ; Castillo, Alesha ; Beaupre, Gary S. / Geometric mouse variation : Implications to the axial ulnar loading protocol and animal specific calibration. In: Journal of Biomechanics. 2013 ; Vol. 46, No. 13. pp. 2271-2276.
@article{2a9d0ca774c54c7395f48938759f30ca,
title = "Geometric mouse variation: Implications to the axial ulnar loading protocol and animal specific calibration",
abstract = "Large variations in axial ulnar load strain calibration results suggest that animal-specific calibrations may be necessary. However, the optimal set of geometric measures for performing an animal-specific calibration are not known, potentially as a result of confounding effects associated with experimentally introduced variation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the inherent variability of ulnar geometric measures known to influence periosteal midshaft strain during axial ulnar exogenous loading, and to further quantify the relationship between the variance of those geometric measures and periosteal strain during axial loading. Thirty-nine right mouse forelimbs were scanned with microCT. Seven geometric measures that influence periosteal strain resulting from a combined axial and bending loading were computed and used to estimate animal-specific strains on the periosteal midshaft. Animal specific strains were estimated using a theoretical model based on the generalized flexure formula. The predicted mean and standard deviation of the simulated midshaft strain gauge measurement resulting from the inter-animal geometric differences was -985±148με/N. The complete beam bending term associated with bending about the Imin axis accounted for 89{\%} of the variance and reduced the residual RMSE to 50.4με. Eccentricity associated with the axial loading contributed a substantial portion of variation to the computed strain suggesting that calibration procedures to account for animal differences should incorporate that variable. The method developed in this study provides a relatively simple procedure for computing animal-specific strains using microCT scan data, without the need of a load/strain calibration study or computationally intensive finite element models.",
keywords = "Axial ulnar loading, Load/strain calibration, MicroCT, Mouse model",
author = "Wagner, {David W.} and Stephanie Chan and Alesha Castillo and Beaupre, {Gary S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.027",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "2271--2276",
journal = "Journal of Biomechanics",
issn = "0021-9290",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geometric mouse variation

T2 - Implications to the axial ulnar loading protocol and animal specific calibration

AU - Wagner, David W.

AU - Chan, Stephanie

AU - Castillo, Alesha

AU - Beaupre, Gary S.

PY - 2013/9/3

Y1 - 2013/9/3

N2 - Large variations in axial ulnar load strain calibration results suggest that animal-specific calibrations may be necessary. However, the optimal set of geometric measures for performing an animal-specific calibration are not known, potentially as a result of confounding effects associated with experimentally introduced variation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the inherent variability of ulnar geometric measures known to influence periosteal midshaft strain during axial ulnar exogenous loading, and to further quantify the relationship between the variance of those geometric measures and periosteal strain during axial loading. Thirty-nine right mouse forelimbs were scanned with microCT. Seven geometric measures that influence periosteal strain resulting from a combined axial and bending loading were computed and used to estimate animal-specific strains on the periosteal midshaft. Animal specific strains were estimated using a theoretical model based on the generalized flexure formula. The predicted mean and standard deviation of the simulated midshaft strain gauge measurement resulting from the inter-animal geometric differences was -985±148με/N. The complete beam bending term associated with bending about the Imin axis accounted for 89% of the variance and reduced the residual RMSE to 50.4με. Eccentricity associated with the axial loading contributed a substantial portion of variation to the computed strain suggesting that calibration procedures to account for animal differences should incorporate that variable. The method developed in this study provides a relatively simple procedure for computing animal-specific strains using microCT scan data, without the need of a load/strain calibration study or computationally intensive finite element models.

AB - Large variations in axial ulnar load strain calibration results suggest that animal-specific calibrations may be necessary. However, the optimal set of geometric measures for performing an animal-specific calibration are not known, potentially as a result of confounding effects associated with experimentally introduced variation. The purpose of this study was to characterize the inherent variability of ulnar geometric measures known to influence periosteal midshaft strain during axial ulnar exogenous loading, and to further quantify the relationship between the variance of those geometric measures and periosteal strain during axial loading. Thirty-nine right mouse forelimbs were scanned with microCT. Seven geometric measures that influence periosteal strain resulting from a combined axial and bending loading were computed and used to estimate animal-specific strains on the periosteal midshaft. Animal specific strains were estimated using a theoretical model based on the generalized flexure formula. The predicted mean and standard deviation of the simulated midshaft strain gauge measurement resulting from the inter-animal geometric differences was -985±148με/N. The complete beam bending term associated with bending about the Imin axis accounted for 89% of the variance and reduced the residual RMSE to 50.4με. Eccentricity associated with the axial loading contributed a substantial portion of variation to the computed strain suggesting that calibration procedures to account for animal differences should incorporate that variable. The method developed in this study provides a relatively simple procedure for computing animal-specific strains using microCT scan data, without the need of a load/strain calibration study or computationally intensive finite element models.

KW - Axial ulnar loading

KW - Load/strain calibration

KW - MicroCT

KW - Mouse model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882274294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882274294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.027

DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.06.027

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 2271

EP - 2276

JO - Journal of Biomechanics

JF - Journal of Biomechanics

SN - 0021-9290

IS - 13

ER -