Geographies of Risk, the Regulatory State, and the Ethic of Care

Raul P. Lejano, Richard Funderburg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We examine the role of the regulatory state in the inequitable distribution of social advantages and disadvantages. To illustrate this, we examine the spatial distribution of exposures to air toxics from noxious land uses (commonly referred to as the environmental justice problem) and inquire into the nature of state action that would allow such inequity. Findings from our inquiry lead us to focus more closely on the administrative functions of the state, especially its role as a regulatory body. A case study focusing on health risks from incompatible land uses illustrates how spatial inequities result from the formally neutral rule-making actions of regulatory agencies and their particular organizational cultures. We describe the ethical basis of the regulatory state in terms of its formal, juridical, deontological underpinnings. In contrast to this stands the alternative ethical concept of care, which is inherently relational, contextual, and preferentially attentive to the needs of the vulnerable. We argue that the regulatory state can be reformed, building structures of care to better address issues of spatial inequity. We end with a discussion of how the institutional model of the caring state might be achieved in practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1097-1113
Number of pages17
JournalAnnals of the American Association of Geographers
Volume106
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2016

Fingerprint

ethics
land use
moral philosophy
geography
environmental justice
organizational culture
health risk
building
justice
air
spatial distribution
distribution
need
exposure

Keywords

  • environmental justice
  • ethic of care
  • governance
  • regulatory state
  • spatial inequity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Geographies of Risk, the Regulatory State, and the Ethic of Care. / Lejano, Raul P.; Funderburg, Richard.

In: Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 106, No. 5, 02.09.2016, p. 1097-1113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d0372c6a3e84b4689f0edb453edbb77,
title = "Geographies of Risk, the Regulatory State, and the Ethic of Care",
abstract = "We examine the role of the regulatory state in the inequitable distribution of social advantages and disadvantages. To illustrate this, we examine the spatial distribution of exposures to air toxics from noxious land uses (commonly referred to as the environmental justice problem) and inquire into the nature of state action that would allow such inequity. Findings from our inquiry lead us to focus more closely on the administrative functions of the state, especially its role as a regulatory body. A case study focusing on health risks from incompatible land uses illustrates how spatial inequities result from the formally neutral rule-making actions of regulatory agencies and their particular organizational cultures. We describe the ethical basis of the regulatory state in terms of its formal, juridical, deontological underpinnings. In contrast to this stands the alternative ethical concept of care, which is inherently relational, contextual, and preferentially attentive to the needs of the vulnerable. We argue that the regulatory state can be reformed, building structures of care to better address issues of spatial inequity. We end with a discussion of how the institutional model of the caring state might be achieved in practice.",
keywords = "environmental justice, ethic of care, governance, regulatory state, spatial inequity",
author = "Lejano, {Raul P.} and Richard Funderburg",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/24694452.2016.1179565",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "1097--1113",
journal = "Annals of the American Association of Geographers",
issn = "2469-4452",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographies of Risk, the Regulatory State, and the Ethic of Care

AU - Lejano, Raul P.

AU - Funderburg, Richard

PY - 2016/9/2

Y1 - 2016/9/2

N2 - We examine the role of the regulatory state in the inequitable distribution of social advantages and disadvantages. To illustrate this, we examine the spatial distribution of exposures to air toxics from noxious land uses (commonly referred to as the environmental justice problem) and inquire into the nature of state action that would allow such inequity. Findings from our inquiry lead us to focus more closely on the administrative functions of the state, especially its role as a regulatory body. A case study focusing on health risks from incompatible land uses illustrates how spatial inequities result from the formally neutral rule-making actions of regulatory agencies and their particular organizational cultures. We describe the ethical basis of the regulatory state in terms of its formal, juridical, deontological underpinnings. In contrast to this stands the alternative ethical concept of care, which is inherently relational, contextual, and preferentially attentive to the needs of the vulnerable. We argue that the regulatory state can be reformed, building structures of care to better address issues of spatial inequity. We end with a discussion of how the institutional model of the caring state might be achieved in practice.

AB - We examine the role of the regulatory state in the inequitable distribution of social advantages and disadvantages. To illustrate this, we examine the spatial distribution of exposures to air toxics from noxious land uses (commonly referred to as the environmental justice problem) and inquire into the nature of state action that would allow such inequity. Findings from our inquiry lead us to focus more closely on the administrative functions of the state, especially its role as a regulatory body. A case study focusing on health risks from incompatible land uses illustrates how spatial inequities result from the formally neutral rule-making actions of regulatory agencies and their particular organizational cultures. We describe the ethical basis of the regulatory state in terms of its formal, juridical, deontological underpinnings. In contrast to this stands the alternative ethical concept of care, which is inherently relational, contextual, and preferentially attentive to the needs of the vulnerable. We argue that the regulatory state can be reformed, building structures of care to better address issues of spatial inequity. We end with a discussion of how the institutional model of the caring state might be achieved in practice.

KW - environmental justice

KW - ethic of care

KW - governance

KW - regulatory state

KW - spatial inequity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987981883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84987981883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1179565

DO - 10.1080/24694452.2016.1179565

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84987981883

VL - 106

SP - 1097

EP - 1113

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

SN - 2469-4452

IS - 5

ER -