Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks

Sarah Beck, Jill V. Jeffery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Genre-based approaches to teaching writing have made important strides in heightening students' awareness of audience and purpose but have paid less attention to the ways in which expectations for written performance in school context are embedded in expectations for certain kinds of discipline-based thinking. In this paper we present a study that explored how a group of high school students studying history and literature within an interdisciplinary framework experience the thinking demands associated with a particular kind of writing characteristic of both subjects: analytic exposition. We found that the task of articulating interpretive thematic statements is a significant challenge for these students, in some cases because the nature of interpretative understanding remains elusive to them and in others because they struggle with finding the language to express this understanding in a concise form. A separate but related finding has to do with opportunities for interpretive insight that arose from writing in genres other than conventional analytic exposition, for example, narrative, descriptive, and imaginative writing. We conclude our discussion by recommending further investigation of ways in which alternatives to analytic exposition may be used as bridges to mastery of this important academic genre.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-272
Number of pages45
JournalJournal of Literacy Research
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

genre
student
school
narrative
Exposition
Academic Writing
Teaching
history
language
performance
experience
Group
Teaching Writing
Thematic
Descriptive
Heightening
High School Students
Mastery
Language
Conventional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. / Beck, Sarah; Jeffery, Jill V.

In: Journal of Literacy Research, Vol. 41, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 228-272.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beck, Sarah ; Jeffery, Jill V. / Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks. In: Journal of Literacy Research. 2009 ; Vol. 41, No. 2. pp. 228-272.
@article{e2c6794500e7474bb688e1c9b9471e5d,
title = "Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks",
abstract = "Genre-based approaches to teaching writing have made important strides in heightening students' awareness of audience and purpose but have paid less attention to the ways in which expectations for written performance in school context are embedded in expectations for certain kinds of discipline-based thinking. In this paper we present a study that explored how a group of high school students studying history and literature within an interdisciplinary framework experience the thinking demands associated with a particular kind of writing characteristic of both subjects: analytic exposition. We found that the task of articulating interpretive thematic statements is a significant challenge for these students, in some cases because the nature of interpretative understanding remains elusive to them and in others because they struggle with finding the language to express this understanding in a concise form. A separate but related finding has to do with opportunities for interpretive insight that arose from writing in genres other than conventional analytic exposition, for example, narrative, descriptive, and imaginative writing. We conclude our discussion by recommending further investigation of ways in which alternatives to analytic exposition may be used as bridges to mastery of this important academic genre.",
author = "Sarah Beck and Jeffery, {Jill V.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10862960902908483",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "228--272",
journal = "Journal of Literacy Research",
issn = "1086-296X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks

AU - Beck, Sarah

AU - Jeffery, Jill V.

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Genre-based approaches to teaching writing have made important strides in heightening students' awareness of audience and purpose but have paid less attention to the ways in which expectations for written performance in school context are embedded in expectations for certain kinds of discipline-based thinking. In this paper we present a study that explored how a group of high school students studying history and literature within an interdisciplinary framework experience the thinking demands associated with a particular kind of writing characteristic of both subjects: analytic exposition. We found that the task of articulating interpretive thematic statements is a significant challenge for these students, in some cases because the nature of interpretative understanding remains elusive to them and in others because they struggle with finding the language to express this understanding in a concise form. A separate but related finding has to do with opportunities for interpretive insight that arose from writing in genres other than conventional analytic exposition, for example, narrative, descriptive, and imaginative writing. We conclude our discussion by recommending further investigation of ways in which alternatives to analytic exposition may be used as bridges to mastery of this important academic genre.

AB - Genre-based approaches to teaching writing have made important strides in heightening students' awareness of audience and purpose but have paid less attention to the ways in which expectations for written performance in school context are embedded in expectations for certain kinds of discipline-based thinking. In this paper we present a study that explored how a group of high school students studying history and literature within an interdisciplinary framework experience the thinking demands associated with a particular kind of writing characteristic of both subjects: analytic exposition. We found that the task of articulating interpretive thematic statements is a significant challenge for these students, in some cases because the nature of interpretative understanding remains elusive to them and in others because they struggle with finding the language to express this understanding in a concise form. A separate but related finding has to do with opportunities for interpretive insight that arose from writing in genres other than conventional analytic exposition, for example, narrative, descriptive, and imaginative writing. We conclude our discussion by recommending further investigation of ways in which alternatives to analytic exposition may be used as bridges to mastery of this important academic genre.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349278577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349278577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10862960902908483

DO - 10.1080/10862960902908483

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349278577

VL - 41

SP - 228

EP - 272

JO - Journal of Literacy Research

JF - Journal of Literacy Research

SN - 1086-296X

IS - 2

ER -