Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Standard practice in linguistics often obscures the connection between theory and data, leading some to the conclusion that generative linguistics could not serve as the basis for a cognitive neuroscience of language. Here the foundations and methodology of generative grammar are clarified with the goal of explaining how generative theory already functions as a reasonable source of hypotheses about the representation and computation of language in the mind and brain. The claims of generative theory, as exemplified, e.g., within Chomsky's (2000) Minimalist Program, are contrasted with those of theories endorsing parallel architectures with independent systems of generative phonology, syntax and semantics. The single generative engine within Minimalist approaches rejects dual routes to linguistic representations, including possible extra-syntactic strategies for semantic structure-building. Clarification of the implications of this property of generative theory undermines the foundations of an autonomous psycholinguistics, as established in the 1970's, and brings linguistic theory back to the center of a unified cognitive neuroscience of language.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)429-445
Number of pages17
JournalLinguistic Review
Volume22
Issue number2-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 12 2005

Fingerprint

neurosciences
linguistics
language
semantics
psycholinguistics
phonology
syntax
Generative Linguistics
Cognitive Neuroscience
Generative
Language
grammar
brain
methodology
Syntax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language. / Marantz, Alec.

In: Linguistic Review, Vol. 22, No. 2-4, 12.12.2005, p. 429-445.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a36d3abf2f3649869c5929318d2df291,
title = "Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language",
abstract = "Standard practice in linguistics often obscures the connection between theory and data, leading some to the conclusion that generative linguistics could not serve as the basis for a cognitive neuroscience of language. Here the foundations and methodology of generative grammar are clarified with the goal of explaining how generative theory already functions as a reasonable source of hypotheses about the representation and computation of language in the mind and brain. The claims of generative theory, as exemplified, e.g., within Chomsky's (2000) Minimalist Program, are contrasted with those of theories endorsing parallel architectures with independent systems of generative phonology, syntax and semantics. The single generative engine within Minimalist approaches rejects dual routes to linguistic representations, including possible extra-syntactic strategies for semantic structure-building. Clarification of the implications of this property of generative theory undermines the foundations of an autonomous psycholinguistics, as established in the 1970's, and brings linguistic theory back to the center of a unified cognitive neuroscience of language.",
author = "Alec Marantz",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "429--445",
journal = "Linguistic Review",
issn = "0167-6318",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "2-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Generative linguistics within the cognitive neuroscience of language

AU - Marantz, Alec

PY - 2005/12/12

Y1 - 2005/12/12

N2 - Standard practice in linguistics often obscures the connection between theory and data, leading some to the conclusion that generative linguistics could not serve as the basis for a cognitive neuroscience of language. Here the foundations and methodology of generative grammar are clarified with the goal of explaining how generative theory already functions as a reasonable source of hypotheses about the representation and computation of language in the mind and brain. The claims of generative theory, as exemplified, e.g., within Chomsky's (2000) Minimalist Program, are contrasted with those of theories endorsing parallel architectures with independent systems of generative phonology, syntax and semantics. The single generative engine within Minimalist approaches rejects dual routes to linguistic representations, including possible extra-syntactic strategies for semantic structure-building. Clarification of the implications of this property of generative theory undermines the foundations of an autonomous psycholinguistics, as established in the 1970's, and brings linguistic theory back to the center of a unified cognitive neuroscience of language.

AB - Standard practice in linguistics often obscures the connection between theory and data, leading some to the conclusion that generative linguistics could not serve as the basis for a cognitive neuroscience of language. Here the foundations and methodology of generative grammar are clarified with the goal of explaining how generative theory already functions as a reasonable source of hypotheses about the representation and computation of language in the mind and brain. The claims of generative theory, as exemplified, e.g., within Chomsky's (2000) Minimalist Program, are contrasted with those of theories endorsing parallel architectures with independent systems of generative phonology, syntax and semantics. The single generative engine within Minimalist approaches rejects dual routes to linguistic representations, including possible extra-syntactic strategies for semantic structure-building. Clarification of the implications of this property of generative theory undermines the foundations of an autonomous psycholinguistics, as established in the 1970's, and brings linguistic theory back to the center of a unified cognitive neuroscience of language.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=29144487094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=29144487094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429

DO - 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.429

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 429

EP - 445

JO - Linguistic Review

JF - Linguistic Review

SN - 0167-6318

IS - 2-4

ER -