Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics

Ivon Arroyo, Winslow Burleson, Minghui Tai, Kasia Muldner, Beverly Park Woolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We provide evidence of persistent gender effects for students using advanced adaptive technology while learning mathematics. This technology improves each gender's learning and affective predispositions toward mathematics, but specific features in the software help either female or male students. Gender differences were seen in the students' style of use of the system, motivational goals, affective needs, and cognitive/affective benefits, as well as the impact of affective interventions involving pedagogical agents. We describe 4 studies, with hundreds of students in public schools over several years, which suggest that technology responses should probably be customized to each gender. This article shows differential results before, during, and after the use of adaptive tutoring software, indicating that digital tutoring systems can be an important supplement to mathematics classrooms but that male and female students should be addressed differently. Female students were more receptive than male students to seeking and accepting help provided by the tutoring system and to spending time seeing the hints; thus, they had a consistent general trend to benefit more from it, especially when affective learning companions were present. In addition, female students expressed positively valenced emotions most often and exhibited more productive behaviors when exposed to female characters; these affective pedagogical agents encouraged effort and perseverance. This was not the case for male students, who had more positive outcomes when no learning companion was present and their worst affective and cognitive outcomes when the female character was present.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-969
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume105
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Mathematics
gender-specific factors
Learning
mathematics
Students
Technology
female student
learning
student
gender
Software
supplement
emotion
classroom
Emotions
trend
school
evidence

Keywords

  • Adaptive learning environments
  • Affective agents
  • Gender differences
  • Motivation and affect
  • Quantitative analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics. / Arroyo, Ivon; Burleson, Winslow; Tai, Minghui; Muldner, Kasia; Woolf, Beverly Park.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 105, No. 4, 11.2013, p. 957-969.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Arroyo, Ivon ; Burleson, Winslow ; Tai, Minghui ; Muldner, Kasia ; Woolf, Beverly Park. / Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics. In: Journal of Educational Psychology. 2013 ; Vol. 105, No. 4. pp. 957-969.
@article{9dcf1ae35fae471687acdaa5753f2710,
title = "Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics",
abstract = "We provide evidence of persistent gender effects for students using advanced adaptive technology while learning mathematics. This technology improves each gender's learning and affective predispositions toward mathematics, but specific features in the software help either female or male students. Gender differences were seen in the students' style of use of the system, motivational goals, affective needs, and cognitive/affective benefits, as well as the impact of affective interventions involving pedagogical agents. We describe 4 studies, with hundreds of students in public schools over several years, which suggest that technology responses should probably be customized to each gender. This article shows differential results before, during, and after the use of adaptive tutoring software, indicating that digital tutoring systems can be an important supplement to mathematics classrooms but that male and female students should be addressed differently. Female students were more receptive than male students to seeking and accepting help provided by the tutoring system and to spending time seeing the hints; thus, they had a consistent general trend to benefit more from it, especially when affective learning companions were present. In addition, female students expressed positively valenced emotions most often and exhibited more productive behaviors when exposed to female characters; these affective pedagogical agents encouraged effort and perseverance. This was not the case for male students, who had more positive outcomes when no learning companion was present and their worst affective and cognitive outcomes when the female character was present.",
keywords = "Adaptive learning environments, Affective agents, Gender differences, Motivation and affect, Quantitative analysis",
author = "Ivon Arroyo and Winslow Burleson and Minghui Tai and Kasia Muldner and Woolf, {Beverly Park}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/a0032748",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "957--969",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender differences in the use and benefit of advanced learning technologies for mathematics

AU - Arroyo, Ivon

AU - Burleson, Winslow

AU - Tai, Minghui

AU - Muldner, Kasia

AU - Woolf, Beverly Park

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - We provide evidence of persistent gender effects for students using advanced adaptive technology while learning mathematics. This technology improves each gender's learning and affective predispositions toward mathematics, but specific features in the software help either female or male students. Gender differences were seen in the students' style of use of the system, motivational goals, affective needs, and cognitive/affective benefits, as well as the impact of affective interventions involving pedagogical agents. We describe 4 studies, with hundreds of students in public schools over several years, which suggest that technology responses should probably be customized to each gender. This article shows differential results before, during, and after the use of adaptive tutoring software, indicating that digital tutoring systems can be an important supplement to mathematics classrooms but that male and female students should be addressed differently. Female students were more receptive than male students to seeking and accepting help provided by the tutoring system and to spending time seeing the hints; thus, they had a consistent general trend to benefit more from it, especially when affective learning companions were present. In addition, female students expressed positively valenced emotions most often and exhibited more productive behaviors when exposed to female characters; these affective pedagogical agents encouraged effort and perseverance. This was not the case for male students, who had more positive outcomes when no learning companion was present and their worst affective and cognitive outcomes when the female character was present.

AB - We provide evidence of persistent gender effects for students using advanced adaptive technology while learning mathematics. This technology improves each gender's learning and affective predispositions toward mathematics, but specific features in the software help either female or male students. Gender differences were seen in the students' style of use of the system, motivational goals, affective needs, and cognitive/affective benefits, as well as the impact of affective interventions involving pedagogical agents. We describe 4 studies, with hundreds of students in public schools over several years, which suggest that technology responses should probably be customized to each gender. This article shows differential results before, during, and after the use of adaptive tutoring software, indicating that digital tutoring systems can be an important supplement to mathematics classrooms but that male and female students should be addressed differently. Female students were more receptive than male students to seeking and accepting help provided by the tutoring system and to spending time seeing the hints; thus, they had a consistent general trend to benefit more from it, especially when affective learning companions were present. In addition, female students expressed positively valenced emotions most often and exhibited more productive behaviors when exposed to female characters; these affective pedagogical agents encouraged effort and perseverance. This was not the case for male students, who had more positive outcomes when no learning companion was present and their worst affective and cognitive outcomes when the female character was present.

KW - Adaptive learning environments

KW - Affective agents

KW - Gender differences

KW - Motivation and affect

KW - Quantitative analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887561246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887561246&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0032748

DO - 10.1037/a0032748

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84887561246

VL - 105

SP - 957

EP - 969

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 4

ER -