Gay-Straight Alliances Vary on Dimensions of Youth Socializing and Advocacy

Factors Accounting for Individual and Setting-Level Differences

V. Paul Poteat, Jillian R. Scheer, Robert A. Marx, Jerel P. Calzo, Hirokazu Yoshikawa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) are school-based youth settings that could promote health. Yet, GSAs have been treated as homogenous without attention to variability in how they operate or to how youth are involved in different capacities. Using a systems perspective, we considered two primary dimensions along which GSAs function to promote health: providing socializing and advocacy opportunities. Among 448 students in 48 GSAs who attended six regional conferences in Massachusetts (59.8 % LGBQ; 69.9 % White; 70.1 % cisgender female), we found substantial variation among GSAs and youth in levels of socializing and advocacy. GSAs were more distinct from one another on advocacy than socializing. Using multilevel modeling, we identified group and individual factors accounting for this variability. In the socializing model, youth and GSAs that did more socializing activities did more advocacy. In the advocacy model, youth who were more actively engaged in the GSA as well as GSAs whose youth collectively perceived greater school hostility and reported greater social justice efficacy did more advocacy. Findings suggest potential reasons why GSAs vary in how they function in ways ranging from internal provisions of support, to visibility raising, to collective social change. The findings are further relevant for settings supporting youth from other marginalized backgrounds and that include advocacy in their mission.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)422-432
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Community Psychology
Volume55
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Sexual Minorities
health
school
social justice
social change
Hostility
Health
Social Justice
Social Change
Students
Group
student

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Gay-Straight Alliances
  • Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
  • Positive youth development
  • Social justice
  • Social support
  • Youth programs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Applied Psychology
  • Health(social science)

Cite this

Gay-Straight Alliances Vary on Dimensions of Youth Socializing and Advocacy : Factors Accounting for Individual and Setting-Level Differences. / Poteat, V. Paul; Scheer, Jillian R.; Marx, Robert A.; Calzo, Jerel P.; Yoshikawa, Hirokazu.

In: American Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 55, No. 3-4, 01.06.2015, p. 422-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{970226b7b4c34310af4ad80759d85cc7,
title = "Gay-Straight Alliances Vary on Dimensions of Youth Socializing and Advocacy: Factors Accounting for Individual and Setting-Level Differences",
abstract = "Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) are school-based youth settings that could promote health. Yet, GSAs have been treated as homogenous without attention to variability in how they operate or to how youth are involved in different capacities. Using a systems perspective, we considered two primary dimensions along which GSAs function to promote health: providing socializing and advocacy opportunities. Among 448 students in 48 GSAs who attended six regional conferences in Massachusetts (59.8 {\%} LGBQ; 69.9 {\%} White; 70.1 {\%} cisgender female), we found substantial variation among GSAs and youth in levels of socializing and advocacy. GSAs were more distinct from one another on advocacy than socializing. Using multilevel modeling, we identified group and individual factors accounting for this variability. In the socializing model, youth and GSAs that did more socializing activities did more advocacy. In the advocacy model, youth who were more actively engaged in the GSA as well as GSAs whose youth collectively perceived greater school hostility and reported greater social justice efficacy did more advocacy. Findings suggest potential reasons why GSAs vary in how they function in ways ranging from internal provisions of support, to visibility raising, to collective social change. The findings are further relevant for settings supporting youth from other marginalized backgrounds and that include advocacy in their mission.",
keywords = "Advocacy, Gay-Straight Alliances, Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, Positive youth development, Social justice, Social support, Youth programs",
author = "Poteat, {V. Paul} and Scheer, {Jillian R.} and Marx, {Robert A.} and Calzo, {Jerel P.} and Hirokazu Yoshikawa",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10464-015-9722-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "422--432",
journal = "American Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0091-0562",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gay-Straight Alliances Vary on Dimensions of Youth Socializing and Advocacy

T2 - Factors Accounting for Individual and Setting-Level Differences

AU - Poteat, V. Paul

AU - Scheer, Jillian R.

AU - Marx, Robert A.

AU - Calzo, Jerel P.

AU - Yoshikawa, Hirokazu

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) are school-based youth settings that could promote health. Yet, GSAs have been treated as homogenous without attention to variability in how they operate or to how youth are involved in different capacities. Using a systems perspective, we considered two primary dimensions along which GSAs function to promote health: providing socializing and advocacy opportunities. Among 448 students in 48 GSAs who attended six regional conferences in Massachusetts (59.8 % LGBQ; 69.9 % White; 70.1 % cisgender female), we found substantial variation among GSAs and youth in levels of socializing and advocacy. GSAs were more distinct from one another on advocacy than socializing. Using multilevel modeling, we identified group and individual factors accounting for this variability. In the socializing model, youth and GSAs that did more socializing activities did more advocacy. In the advocacy model, youth who were more actively engaged in the GSA as well as GSAs whose youth collectively perceived greater school hostility and reported greater social justice efficacy did more advocacy. Findings suggest potential reasons why GSAs vary in how they function in ways ranging from internal provisions of support, to visibility raising, to collective social change. The findings are further relevant for settings supporting youth from other marginalized backgrounds and that include advocacy in their mission.

AB - Gay-Straight Alliances (GSAs) are school-based youth settings that could promote health. Yet, GSAs have been treated as homogenous without attention to variability in how they operate or to how youth are involved in different capacities. Using a systems perspective, we considered two primary dimensions along which GSAs function to promote health: providing socializing and advocacy opportunities. Among 448 students in 48 GSAs who attended six regional conferences in Massachusetts (59.8 % LGBQ; 69.9 % White; 70.1 % cisgender female), we found substantial variation among GSAs and youth in levels of socializing and advocacy. GSAs were more distinct from one another on advocacy than socializing. Using multilevel modeling, we identified group and individual factors accounting for this variability. In the socializing model, youth and GSAs that did more socializing activities did more advocacy. In the advocacy model, youth who were more actively engaged in the GSA as well as GSAs whose youth collectively perceived greater school hostility and reported greater social justice efficacy did more advocacy. Findings suggest potential reasons why GSAs vary in how they function in ways ranging from internal provisions of support, to visibility raising, to collective social change. The findings are further relevant for settings supporting youth from other marginalized backgrounds and that include advocacy in their mission.

KW - Advocacy

KW - Gay-Straight Alliances

KW - Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender

KW - Positive youth development

KW - Social justice

KW - Social support

KW - Youth programs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937764382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937764382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10464-015-9722-2

DO - 10.1007/s10464-015-9722-2

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 422

EP - 432

JO - American Journal of Community Psychology

JF - American Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0091-0562

IS - 3-4

ER -