Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation

Tae Woo Park, Jonathan Winawer, Josh Wallman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Young animals compensate for defocus imposed by positive or negative spectacle lenses by adjusting the elongation rate of their vitreous chambers, thus matching the length of the eye with the focal length of the eye's optics combined with the spectacle lenses. The ability to compensate for either negative or positive lenses could rely on the ability to distinguish between myopic and hyperopic blur, or it could rely on the fact that positive lenses would bring nearby objects into focus, thereby reducing the amount of blur, whereas negative lenses would not. This study asks whether eyes emmetropize using the magnitude of blur or the sign of blur as a directional cue. We fitted chick eyes with positive lenses while imposing a substantial amount of blur, either (a) by having them wear lenses only when restrained in the center of a cylinder, the walls of which were beyond their far-point or (b) by having them wear mild diffusers over positive lenses. We found good refractive compensation in both situations in a large number of birds. Furthermore, we found that mild diffusers worn on top of positive lenses differentially affected the two ocular components of refractive compensation: there was less choroidal thickening, but more inhibition of ocular elongation, compared to wearing positive lenses alone. These findings argue both that the eye can discern the sign of the blur and that choroidal and ocular-elongation components of the refractive compensation do not respond identically to visual inputs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1519-1531
Number of pages13
JournalVision Research
Volume43
Issue number14
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2003

Fingerprint

Lenses
Aptitude
Birds
Cues

Keywords

  • Choroid
  • Defocus
  • Emmetropization
  • Hyperopia
  • Myopia
  • Ocular refraction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Cite this

Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation. / Park, Tae Woo; Winawer, Jonathan; Wallman, Josh.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 43, No. 14, 06.2003, p. 1519-1531.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Park, Tae Woo ; Winawer, Jonathan ; Wallman, Josh. / Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation. In: Vision Research. 2003 ; Vol. 43, No. 14. pp. 1519-1531.
@article{638b52a492b4403a87bd3393c8c1b905,
title = "Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation",
abstract = "Young animals compensate for defocus imposed by positive or negative spectacle lenses by adjusting the elongation rate of their vitreous chambers, thus matching the length of the eye with the focal length of the eye's optics combined with the spectacle lenses. The ability to compensate for either negative or positive lenses could rely on the ability to distinguish between myopic and hyperopic blur, or it could rely on the fact that positive lenses would bring nearby objects into focus, thereby reducing the amount of blur, whereas negative lenses would not. This study asks whether eyes emmetropize using the magnitude of blur or the sign of blur as a directional cue. We fitted chick eyes with positive lenses while imposing a substantial amount of blur, either (a) by having them wear lenses only when restrained in the center of a cylinder, the walls of which were beyond their far-point or (b) by having them wear mild diffusers over positive lenses. We found good refractive compensation in both situations in a large number of birds. Furthermore, we found that mild diffusers worn on top of positive lenses differentially affected the two ocular components of refractive compensation: there was less choroidal thickening, but more inhibition of ocular elongation, compared to wearing positive lenses alone. These findings argue both that the eye can discern the sign of the blur and that choroidal and ocular-elongation components of the refractive compensation do not respond identically to visual inputs.",
keywords = "Choroid, Defocus, Emmetropization, Hyperopia, Myopia, Ocular refraction",
author = "Park, {Tae Woo} and Jonathan Winawer and Josh Wallman",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00180-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1519--1531",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further evidence that chick eyes use the sign of blur in spectacle lens compensation

AU - Park, Tae Woo

AU - Winawer, Jonathan

AU - Wallman, Josh

PY - 2003/6

Y1 - 2003/6

N2 - Young animals compensate for defocus imposed by positive or negative spectacle lenses by adjusting the elongation rate of their vitreous chambers, thus matching the length of the eye with the focal length of the eye's optics combined with the spectacle lenses. The ability to compensate for either negative or positive lenses could rely on the ability to distinguish between myopic and hyperopic blur, or it could rely on the fact that positive lenses would bring nearby objects into focus, thereby reducing the amount of blur, whereas negative lenses would not. This study asks whether eyes emmetropize using the magnitude of blur or the sign of blur as a directional cue. We fitted chick eyes with positive lenses while imposing a substantial amount of blur, either (a) by having them wear lenses only when restrained in the center of a cylinder, the walls of which were beyond their far-point or (b) by having them wear mild diffusers over positive lenses. We found good refractive compensation in both situations in a large number of birds. Furthermore, we found that mild diffusers worn on top of positive lenses differentially affected the two ocular components of refractive compensation: there was less choroidal thickening, but more inhibition of ocular elongation, compared to wearing positive lenses alone. These findings argue both that the eye can discern the sign of the blur and that choroidal and ocular-elongation components of the refractive compensation do not respond identically to visual inputs.

AB - Young animals compensate for defocus imposed by positive or negative spectacle lenses by adjusting the elongation rate of their vitreous chambers, thus matching the length of the eye with the focal length of the eye's optics combined with the spectacle lenses. The ability to compensate for either negative or positive lenses could rely on the ability to distinguish between myopic and hyperopic blur, or it could rely on the fact that positive lenses would bring nearby objects into focus, thereby reducing the amount of blur, whereas negative lenses would not. This study asks whether eyes emmetropize using the magnitude of blur or the sign of blur as a directional cue. We fitted chick eyes with positive lenses while imposing a substantial amount of blur, either (a) by having them wear lenses only when restrained in the center of a cylinder, the walls of which were beyond their far-point or (b) by having them wear mild diffusers over positive lenses. We found good refractive compensation in both situations in a large number of birds. Furthermore, we found that mild diffusers worn on top of positive lenses differentially affected the two ocular components of refractive compensation: there was less choroidal thickening, but more inhibition of ocular elongation, compared to wearing positive lenses alone. These findings argue both that the eye can discern the sign of the blur and that choroidal and ocular-elongation components of the refractive compensation do not respond identically to visual inputs.

KW - Choroid

KW - Defocus

KW - Emmetropization

KW - Hyperopia

KW - Myopia

KW - Ocular refraction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037648332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037648332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00180-9

DO - 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00180-9

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 1519

EP - 1531

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 14

ER -