Functions in biological kind classification

Tania Lombrozo, Bob Rehder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Biological traits that serve functions, such as a zebra's coloration (for camouflage) or a kangaroo's tail (for balance), seem to have a special role in conceptual representations for biological kinds. In five experiments, we investigate whether and why functional features are privileged in biological kind classification. Experiment 1 experimentally manipulates whether a feature serves a function and finds that functional features are judged more diagnostic of category membership as well as more likely to have a deep evolutionary history, be frequent in the current population, and persist in future populations. Experiments 2-5 reveal that these inferences about history, frequency, and persistence account for nearly all the effect of function on classification. We conclude that functional features are privileged because their relationship with the kind is viewed as stable over time and thus as especially well suited for establishing category membership, with implications for theories of classification and folk biological understanding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-485
Number of pages29
JournalCognitive Psychology
Volume65
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2012

Fingerprint

experiment
History
Camouflage
Macropodidae
Equidae
Experiments
history
Population
persistence
Tail
diagnostic
time

Keywords

  • Biological kind concepts
  • Categorization
  • Diagnosticity
  • Functional features
  • Functions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Functions in biological kind classification. / Lombrozo, Tania; Rehder, Bob.

In: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 4, 12.2012, p. 457-485.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lombrozo, Tania ; Rehder, Bob. / Functions in biological kind classification. In: Cognitive Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 457-485.
@article{c4657546d96940489f4c2b495a3fae29,
title = "Functions in biological kind classification",
abstract = "Biological traits that serve functions, such as a zebra's coloration (for camouflage) or a kangaroo's tail (for balance), seem to have a special role in conceptual representations for biological kinds. In five experiments, we investigate whether and why functional features are privileged in biological kind classification. Experiment 1 experimentally manipulates whether a feature serves a function and finds that functional features are judged more diagnostic of category membership as well as more likely to have a deep evolutionary history, be frequent in the current population, and persist in future populations. Experiments 2-5 reveal that these inferences about history, frequency, and persistence account for nearly all the effect of function on classification. We conclude that functional features are privileged because their relationship with the kind is viewed as stable over time and thus as especially well suited for establishing category membership, with implications for theories of classification and folk biological understanding.",
keywords = "Biological kind concepts, Categorization, Diagnosticity, Functional features, Functions",
author = "Tania Lombrozo and Bob Rehder",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "457--485",
journal = "Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0010-0285",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functions in biological kind classification

AU - Lombrozo, Tania

AU - Rehder, Bob

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - Biological traits that serve functions, such as a zebra's coloration (for camouflage) or a kangaroo's tail (for balance), seem to have a special role in conceptual representations for biological kinds. In five experiments, we investigate whether and why functional features are privileged in biological kind classification. Experiment 1 experimentally manipulates whether a feature serves a function and finds that functional features are judged more diagnostic of category membership as well as more likely to have a deep evolutionary history, be frequent in the current population, and persist in future populations. Experiments 2-5 reveal that these inferences about history, frequency, and persistence account for nearly all the effect of function on classification. We conclude that functional features are privileged because their relationship with the kind is viewed as stable over time and thus as especially well suited for establishing category membership, with implications for theories of classification and folk biological understanding.

AB - Biological traits that serve functions, such as a zebra's coloration (for camouflage) or a kangaroo's tail (for balance), seem to have a special role in conceptual representations for biological kinds. In five experiments, we investigate whether and why functional features are privileged in biological kind classification. Experiment 1 experimentally manipulates whether a feature serves a function and finds that functional features are judged more diagnostic of category membership as well as more likely to have a deep evolutionary history, be frequent in the current population, and persist in future populations. Experiments 2-5 reveal that these inferences about history, frequency, and persistence account for nearly all the effect of function on classification. We conclude that functional features are privileged because their relationship with the kind is viewed as stable over time and thus as especially well suited for establishing category membership, with implications for theories of classification and folk biological understanding.

KW - Biological kind concepts

KW - Categorization

KW - Diagnosticity

KW - Functional features

KW - Functions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865543914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865543914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 457

EP - 485

JO - Cognitive Psychology

JF - Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0010-0285

IS - 4

ER -