Functional MRI-based lie detection: Scientific and societal challenges

Martha J. Farah, J. Benjamin Hutchinson, Elizabeth Phelps, Anthony D. Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI)-based lie detection has been marketed as a tool for enhancing personnel selection, strengthening national security and protecting personal reputations, and at least three US courts have been asked to admit the results of lie detection scans as evidence during trials. How well does fMRI-based lie detection perform, and how should the courts, and society more generally, respond? Here, we address various questions-some of which are based on a meta-analysis of published studies-concerning the scientific state of the art in fMRI-based lie detection and its legal status, and discuss broader ethical and societal implications. We close with three general policy recommendations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)123-131
Number of pages9
JournalNature Reviews Neuroscience
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Lie Detection
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Security Measures
Personnel Selection
Jurisprudence
Meta-Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Functional MRI-based lie detection : Scientific and societal challenges. / Farah, Martha J.; Hutchinson, J. Benjamin; Phelps, Elizabeth; Wagner, Anthony D.

In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 15, No. 2, 02.2014, p. 123-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Farah, Martha J. ; Hutchinson, J. Benjamin ; Phelps, Elizabeth ; Wagner, Anthony D. / Functional MRI-based lie detection : Scientific and societal challenges. In: Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 15, No. 2. pp. 123-131.
@article{17f320917b8e41f1828c3dcaef787392,
title = "Functional MRI-based lie detection: Scientific and societal challenges",
abstract = "Functional MRI (fMRI)-based lie detection has been marketed as a tool for enhancing personnel selection, strengthening national security and protecting personal reputations, and at least three US courts have been asked to admit the results of lie detection scans as evidence during trials. How well does fMRI-based lie detection perform, and how should the courts, and society more generally, respond? Here, we address various questions-some of which are based on a meta-analysis of published studies-concerning the scientific state of the art in fMRI-based lie detection and its legal status, and discuss broader ethical and societal implications. We close with three general policy recommendations.",
author = "Farah, {Martha J.} and Hutchinson, {J. Benjamin} and Elizabeth Phelps and Wagner, {Anthony D.}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1038/nrn3665",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "123--131",
journal = "Nature Reviews Neuroscience",
issn = "1471-003X",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Functional MRI-based lie detection

T2 - Scientific and societal challenges

AU - Farah, Martha J.

AU - Hutchinson, J. Benjamin

AU - Phelps, Elizabeth

AU - Wagner, Anthony D.

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Functional MRI (fMRI)-based lie detection has been marketed as a tool for enhancing personnel selection, strengthening national security and protecting personal reputations, and at least three US courts have been asked to admit the results of lie detection scans as evidence during trials. How well does fMRI-based lie detection perform, and how should the courts, and society more generally, respond? Here, we address various questions-some of which are based on a meta-analysis of published studies-concerning the scientific state of the art in fMRI-based lie detection and its legal status, and discuss broader ethical and societal implications. We close with three general policy recommendations.

AB - Functional MRI (fMRI)-based lie detection has been marketed as a tool for enhancing personnel selection, strengthening national security and protecting personal reputations, and at least three US courts have been asked to admit the results of lie detection scans as evidence during trials. How well does fMRI-based lie detection perform, and how should the courts, and society more generally, respond? Here, we address various questions-some of which are based on a meta-analysis of published studies-concerning the scientific state of the art in fMRI-based lie detection and its legal status, and discuss broader ethical and societal implications. We close with three general policy recommendations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892708969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892708969&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/nrn3665

DO - 10.1038/nrn3665

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 123

EP - 131

JO - Nature Reviews Neuroscience

JF - Nature Reviews Neuroscience

SN - 1471-003X

IS - 2

ER -