From sword to plowshare

Using race for discrimination and antidiscrimination in the United States

Ann Morning, Daniel Sabbagh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This article addresses the question of how the United States' policies of antidiscrimination drew on official racial categories that were traditionally used explicitly for discriminatory purposes. After briefly recounting the history of official racial classification practices in the United States and their relation to racist laws and practices, we describe the development of legal prohibitions on racial discrimination, culminating in the civil rights movement of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. This leads to an examination of how statistical data on race are used to implement civil rights law, before outlining contemporary official racial categories. Finally, we assess the debates that have arisen concerning the collection of racial statistics for the purposes of antidiscrimination enforcement. In conclusion, we argue that, more than any autonomous political challenge to the principle of government race classification, what has emerged powerfully in recent years is an awareness of tensions between the needs of the civil rights enforcement machinery and the emerging claim of Americans' "right" to self-define racially as they see fit - in short, between the politics of distribution and the politics of recognition.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)57-73
    Number of pages17
    JournalInternational Social Science Journal
    Volume57
    Issue number183
    StatePublished - Mar 2005

    Fingerprint

    affirmative action
    civil rights
    discrimination
    civil rights movement
    Law
    politics
    racism
    statistics
    examination
    history

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    From sword to plowshare : Using race for discrimination and antidiscrimination in the United States. / Morning, Ann; Sabbagh, Daniel.

    In: International Social Science Journal, Vol. 57, No. 183, 03.2005, p. 57-73.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{f9584a05213347269e958b5db02f0a84,
    title = "From sword to plowshare: Using race for discrimination and antidiscrimination in the United States",
    abstract = "This article addresses the question of how the United States' policies of antidiscrimination drew on official racial categories that were traditionally used explicitly for discriminatory purposes. After briefly recounting the history of official racial classification practices in the United States and their relation to racist laws and practices, we describe the development of legal prohibitions on racial discrimination, culminating in the civil rights movement of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. This leads to an examination of how statistical data on race are used to implement civil rights law, before outlining contemporary official racial categories. Finally, we assess the debates that have arisen concerning the collection of racial statistics for the purposes of antidiscrimination enforcement. In conclusion, we argue that, more than any autonomous political challenge to the principle of government race classification, what has emerged powerfully in recent years is an awareness of tensions between the needs of the civil rights enforcement machinery and the emerging claim of Americans' {"}right{"} to self-define racially as they see fit - in short, between the politics of distribution and the politics of recognition.",
    author = "Ann Morning and Daniel Sabbagh",
    year = "2005",
    month = "3",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "57",
    pages = "57--73",
    journal = "International Social Science Journal",
    issn = "0020-8701",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "183",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - From sword to plowshare

    T2 - Using race for discrimination and antidiscrimination in the United States

    AU - Morning, Ann

    AU - Sabbagh, Daniel

    PY - 2005/3

    Y1 - 2005/3

    N2 - This article addresses the question of how the United States' policies of antidiscrimination drew on official racial categories that were traditionally used explicitly for discriminatory purposes. After briefly recounting the history of official racial classification practices in the United States and their relation to racist laws and practices, we describe the development of legal prohibitions on racial discrimination, culminating in the civil rights movement of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. This leads to an examination of how statistical data on race are used to implement civil rights law, before outlining contemporary official racial categories. Finally, we assess the debates that have arisen concerning the collection of racial statistics for the purposes of antidiscrimination enforcement. In conclusion, we argue that, more than any autonomous political challenge to the principle of government race classification, what has emerged powerfully in recent years is an awareness of tensions between the needs of the civil rights enforcement machinery and the emerging claim of Americans' "right" to self-define racially as they see fit - in short, between the politics of distribution and the politics of recognition.

    AB - This article addresses the question of how the United States' policies of antidiscrimination drew on official racial categories that were traditionally used explicitly for discriminatory purposes. After briefly recounting the history of official racial classification practices in the United States and their relation to racist laws and practices, we describe the development of legal prohibitions on racial discrimination, culminating in the civil rights movement of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. This leads to an examination of how statistical data on race are used to implement civil rights law, before outlining contemporary official racial categories. Finally, we assess the debates that have arisen concerning the collection of racial statistics for the purposes of antidiscrimination enforcement. In conclusion, we argue that, more than any autonomous political challenge to the principle of government race classification, what has emerged powerfully in recent years is an awareness of tensions between the needs of the civil rights enforcement machinery and the emerging claim of Americans' "right" to self-define racially as they see fit - in short, between the politics of distribution and the politics of recognition.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20644434364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20644434364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 57

    SP - 57

    EP - 73

    JO - International Social Science Journal

    JF - International Social Science Journal

    SN - 0020-8701

    IS - 183

    ER -