From I-Search to iSearch 2.0

Tara L. Alvey, Nathan C. Phillips, Emily C. Bigelow, Blaine E. Smith, Erin Pfaff, Walt Colt, Kevin M. Leander, Bridget Dalton, Jasmine Y. Ma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This classroom narrative proposes a process for reinventing academic research and writing in secondary schools for the 21st Century. We build on Macrorie's (1988) I-Search paper, drawing on affordances of Web 2.0 technologies and culture, to initiate the iSearch 2.0 process. iSearch 2.0 consists of four phases: 1) messing about and trying on questions; 2) exploring and expanding the edge of knowledge; 3) publication; and 4) reflection and self-assessment. This new academic research and writing process makes it possible for students to investigate and try out possible research topics, actively participate in the social construction of knowledge, trace sources efficiently, create meaningful products, and distribute information (regarding both the process and products of research) widely. iSearch 2.0 allows students to receive feedback from broad publics during the process of research and also to utilise multiple methods and compositional modes for self-reflection. Assessment strategies for iSearch 2.0 can incorporate interest communities outside the school and should consider the process and products of inquiry.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-148
Number of pages10
JournalEnglish Teaching
Volume10
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

reflexivity
self-assessment
social construction
secondary school
student
narrative
classroom
school
community
Academic Research
Academic Writing
Secondary School
Writing Process
Self-reflection
21st Century
Affordances
Web 2.0
Social Construction
Self-assessment

Keywords

  • Academic research and writing
  • Assessment
  • Collective intelligence
  • I-Search
  • Inquiry
  • ISearch 2.0
  • Messing about
  • Publishing out
  • Web 2.0 technologies and culture
  • Youth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

Alvey, T. L., Phillips, N. C., Bigelow, E. C., Smith, B. E., Pfaff, E., Colt, W., ... Ma, J. Y. (2011). From I-Search to iSearch 2.0. English Teaching, 10(4), 139-148.

From I-Search to iSearch 2.0. / Alvey, Tara L.; Phillips, Nathan C.; Bigelow, Emily C.; Smith, Blaine E.; Pfaff, Erin; Colt, Walt; Leander, Kevin M.; Dalton, Bridget; Ma, Jasmine Y.

In: English Teaching, Vol. 10, No. 4, 12.2011, p. 139-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alvey, TL, Phillips, NC, Bigelow, EC, Smith, BE, Pfaff, E, Colt, W, Leander, KM, Dalton, B & Ma, JY 2011, 'From I-Search to iSearch 2.0', English Teaching, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 139-148.
Alvey TL, Phillips NC, Bigelow EC, Smith BE, Pfaff E, Colt W et al. From I-Search to iSearch 2.0. English Teaching. 2011 Dec;10(4):139-148.
Alvey, Tara L. ; Phillips, Nathan C. ; Bigelow, Emily C. ; Smith, Blaine E. ; Pfaff, Erin ; Colt, Walt ; Leander, Kevin M. ; Dalton, Bridget ; Ma, Jasmine Y. / From I-Search to iSearch 2.0. In: English Teaching. 2011 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 139-148.
@article{74dd5628941f473a88d27c36a260413b,
title = "From I-Search to iSearch 2.0",
abstract = "This classroom narrative proposes a process for reinventing academic research and writing in secondary schools for the 21st Century. We build on Macrorie's (1988) I-Search paper, drawing on affordances of Web 2.0 technologies and culture, to initiate the iSearch 2.0 process. iSearch 2.0 consists of four phases: 1) messing about and trying on questions; 2) exploring and expanding the edge of knowledge; 3) publication; and 4) reflection and self-assessment. This new academic research and writing process makes it possible for students to investigate and try out possible research topics, actively participate in the social construction of knowledge, trace sources efficiently, create meaningful products, and distribute information (regarding both the process and products of research) widely. iSearch 2.0 allows students to receive feedback from broad publics during the process of research and also to utilise multiple methods and compositional modes for self-reflection. Assessment strategies for iSearch 2.0 can incorporate interest communities outside the school and should consider the process and products of inquiry.",
keywords = "Academic research and writing, Assessment, Collective intelligence, I-Search, Inquiry, ISearch 2.0, Messing about, Publishing out, Web 2.0 technologies and culture, Youth",
author = "Alvey, {Tara L.} and Phillips, {Nathan C.} and Bigelow, {Emily C.} and Smith, {Blaine E.} and Erin Pfaff and Walt Colt and Leander, {Kevin M.} and Bridget Dalton and Ma, {Jasmine Y.}",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "139--148",
journal = "English Teaching",
issn = "1175-8708",
publisher = "University of Waikato",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From I-Search to iSearch 2.0

AU - Alvey, Tara L.

AU - Phillips, Nathan C.

AU - Bigelow, Emily C.

AU - Smith, Blaine E.

AU - Pfaff, Erin

AU - Colt, Walt

AU - Leander, Kevin M.

AU - Dalton, Bridget

AU - Ma, Jasmine Y.

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - This classroom narrative proposes a process for reinventing academic research and writing in secondary schools for the 21st Century. We build on Macrorie's (1988) I-Search paper, drawing on affordances of Web 2.0 technologies and culture, to initiate the iSearch 2.0 process. iSearch 2.0 consists of four phases: 1) messing about and trying on questions; 2) exploring and expanding the edge of knowledge; 3) publication; and 4) reflection and self-assessment. This new academic research and writing process makes it possible for students to investigate and try out possible research topics, actively participate in the social construction of knowledge, trace sources efficiently, create meaningful products, and distribute information (regarding both the process and products of research) widely. iSearch 2.0 allows students to receive feedback from broad publics during the process of research and also to utilise multiple methods and compositional modes for self-reflection. Assessment strategies for iSearch 2.0 can incorporate interest communities outside the school and should consider the process and products of inquiry.

AB - This classroom narrative proposes a process for reinventing academic research and writing in secondary schools for the 21st Century. We build on Macrorie's (1988) I-Search paper, drawing on affordances of Web 2.0 technologies and culture, to initiate the iSearch 2.0 process. iSearch 2.0 consists of four phases: 1) messing about and trying on questions; 2) exploring and expanding the edge of knowledge; 3) publication; and 4) reflection and self-assessment. This new academic research and writing process makes it possible for students to investigate and try out possible research topics, actively participate in the social construction of knowledge, trace sources efficiently, create meaningful products, and distribute information (regarding both the process and products of research) widely. iSearch 2.0 allows students to receive feedback from broad publics during the process of research and also to utilise multiple methods and compositional modes for self-reflection. Assessment strategies for iSearch 2.0 can incorporate interest communities outside the school and should consider the process and products of inquiry.

KW - Academic research and writing

KW - Assessment

KW - Collective intelligence

KW - I-Search

KW - Inquiry

KW - ISearch 2.0

KW - Messing about

KW - Publishing out

KW - Web 2.0 technologies and culture

KW - Youth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84055213070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84055213070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84055213070

VL - 10

SP - 139

EP - 148

JO - English Teaching

JF - English Teaching

SN - 1175-8708

IS - 4

ER -