From Consent to Mutual Inquiry:Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research

Sonia Ospina, Jennifer Dodge, Bethany Godsoe, Joan Minieri, Salvador Reza, Ellen Schall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Leadership for a Changing World (LCW) program is a joint endeavor between the Ford Foundation, the Advocacy Institute, and the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. This paper focuses on the experiences of the Research and Documentation component of LCW – lead by a research team from the Wagner School – during the initial implementation phases of the research. This component formed an inquiry group consisting of both academic researchers and social change practitioners to collaboratively explore and discover the ways in which communities doing social change engage in the work of leadership. We used group relations theory to understand a series of critical dilemmas and contradictions experienced by the coresearchers. This paper identifies four such paradoxes that center around issues of democracy and authority.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-69
Number of pages23
JournalAction Research
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Fingerprint

action research
leadership
democracy
social change
group relations
school graduate
public service
documentation
school
community
Authority
Consent
Democracy
experience
Group
Advocacy
Public services
Paradox
Documentation

Keywords

  • action research
  • group relations
  • leadership
  • paradox
  • social change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

From Consent to Mutual Inquiry:Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research. / Ospina, Sonia; Dodge, Jennifer; Godsoe, Bethany; Minieri, Joan; Reza, Salvador; Schall, Ellen.

In: Action Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.01.2004, p. 47-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ospina, Sonia ; Dodge, Jennifer ; Godsoe, Bethany ; Minieri, Joan ; Reza, Salvador ; Schall, Ellen. / From Consent to Mutual Inquiry:Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research. In: Action Research. 2004 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 47-69.
@article{15cfbf0d89ef4777b0a613827de296dd,
title = "From Consent to Mutual Inquiry:Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research",
abstract = "The Leadership for a Changing World (LCW) program is a joint endeavor between the Ford Foundation, the Advocacy Institute, and the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. This paper focuses on the experiences of the Research and Documentation component of LCW – lead by a research team from the Wagner School – during the initial implementation phases of the research. This component formed an inquiry group consisting of both academic researchers and social change practitioners to collaboratively explore and discover the ways in which communities doing social change engage in the work of leadership. We used group relations theory to understand a series of critical dilemmas and contradictions experienced by the coresearchers. This paper identifies four such paradoxes that center around issues of democracy and authority.",
keywords = "action research, group relations, leadership, paradox, social change",
author = "Sonia Ospina and Jennifer Dodge and Bethany Godsoe and Joan Minieri and Salvador Reza and Ellen Schall",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476750304040494",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "47--69",
journal = "Action Research",
issn = "1476-7503",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Consent to Mutual Inquiry:Balancing Democracy and Authority in Action Research

AU - Ospina, Sonia

AU - Dodge, Jennifer

AU - Godsoe, Bethany

AU - Minieri, Joan

AU - Reza, Salvador

AU - Schall, Ellen

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - The Leadership for a Changing World (LCW) program is a joint endeavor between the Ford Foundation, the Advocacy Institute, and the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. This paper focuses on the experiences of the Research and Documentation component of LCW – lead by a research team from the Wagner School – during the initial implementation phases of the research. This component formed an inquiry group consisting of both academic researchers and social change practitioners to collaboratively explore and discover the ways in which communities doing social change engage in the work of leadership. We used group relations theory to understand a series of critical dilemmas and contradictions experienced by the coresearchers. This paper identifies four such paradoxes that center around issues of democracy and authority.

AB - The Leadership for a Changing World (LCW) program is a joint endeavor between the Ford Foundation, the Advocacy Institute, and the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service. This paper focuses on the experiences of the Research and Documentation component of LCW – lead by a research team from the Wagner School – during the initial implementation phases of the research. This component formed an inquiry group consisting of both academic researchers and social change practitioners to collaboratively explore and discover the ways in which communities doing social change engage in the work of leadership. We used group relations theory to understand a series of critical dilemmas and contradictions experienced by the coresearchers. This paper identifies four such paradoxes that center around issues of democracy and authority.

KW - action research

KW - group relations

KW - leadership

KW - paradox

KW - social change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=15944370471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=15944370471&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476750304040494

DO - 10.1177/1476750304040494

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:15944370471

VL - 2

SP - 47

EP - 69

JO - Action Research

JF - Action Research

SN - 1476-7503

IS - 1

ER -