From chief to technocrat

Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa

Frederick Cooper

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    If the nineteenth century was supposed to be the age of bureaucratization in Europe, then the empires that European powers established in Africa at the end of that century should have marked the highpoint of the relationship of bureaucracy to empire. On paper, such appeared to be the case. Governors, provincial commissioners, district commissioners and district officers administered clearly marked territories as part of a civil service carefully recruited and supervised. But the realities of colonial administration were otherwise. The local official was, in the French expression, le roi de la brousse (‘king of the brush’). His authority depended on relations with local elites, referred to as chiefs; while chiefs were subject to sanctions, they knew that white officials depended on them to collect taxes, recruit soldiers and round up young men for forced labour. Day-to-day administration relied on layers of tacit understandings between European officials and local authorities, with another layer of translators, clerks and guards beneath them; colonial courts and military force were to be used only as needed. This system kept Africa fragmented enough that challenges could be contained for a time, but it was inadequate to fulfilling colonial claims of a ‘civilizing mission’ or, later, a project of ‘development’. In this chapter, I argue that the bureaucratization of empire in Africa was a task that remained to be accomplished at the end of World War II; when colonial powers at last got serious about the task, the result was not a consolidation of their power. On the contrary, it was during the attempt to modernize imperial rule that the British and French empires unravelled. Beginning in the late 1930s, and especially after World War II, British and French governments developed a new administrative structure to take a more active role in economic development. My chapter takes as its principal case study the Inspection du Travail in French West Africa, with some comparisons to the labour officers of British Africa. Getting people to work in a productive and orderly fashion was, for obvious reasons, of great importance to imperial regimes, and both the lateness of the attempt to systematize control of labour and the urgency with which that effort was finally undertaken are striking. Here we have a set of officials, marginalized in pre-war Africa, who were empowered after the war.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationEmpires and Bureaucracy in World History
    Subtitle of host publicationFrom Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pages391-411
    Number of pages21
    ISBN (Electronic)9781316694312
    ISBN (Print)9781107166035
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Africa
    Authority
    Colonies
    Labor
    Second World War
    Layer
    Commissioner
    Bureaucratization
    Bureaucracy
    Highpoint
    Colonial Power
    1930s
    Clerk
    Translator
    Provincial
    French Government
    Economic Development
    French Empire
    British Government
    Soldiers

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Arts and Humanities(all)

    Cite this

    Cooper, F. (2016). From chief to technocrat: Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa. In Empires and Bureaucracy in World History: From Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century (pp. 391-411). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316694312.017

    From chief to technocrat : Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa. / Cooper, Frederick.

    Empires and Bureaucracy in World History: From Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 391-411.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Cooper, F 2016, From chief to technocrat: Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa. in Empires and Bureaucracy in World History: From Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, pp. 391-411. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316694312.017
    Cooper F. From chief to technocrat: Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa. In Empires and Bureaucracy in World History: From Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press. 2016. p. 391-411 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316694312.017
    Cooper, Frederick. / From chief to technocrat : Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa. Empires and Bureaucracy in World History: From Late Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, 2016. pp. 391-411
    @inbook{20a75ae999144469bbffa8913e42fd0b,
    title = "From chief to technocrat: Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa",
    abstract = "If the nineteenth century was supposed to be the age of bureaucratization in Europe, then the empires that European powers established in Africa at the end of that century should have marked the highpoint of the relationship of bureaucracy to empire. On paper, such appeared to be the case. Governors, provincial commissioners, district commissioners and district officers administered clearly marked territories as part of a civil service carefully recruited and supervised. But the realities of colonial administration were otherwise. The local official was, in the French expression, le roi de la brousse (‘king of the brush’). His authority depended on relations with local elites, referred to as chiefs; while chiefs were subject to sanctions, they knew that white officials depended on them to collect taxes, recruit soldiers and round up young men for forced labour. Day-to-day administration relied on layers of tacit understandings between European officials and local authorities, with another layer of translators, clerks and guards beneath them; colonial courts and military force were to be used only as needed. This system kept Africa fragmented enough that challenges could be contained for a time, but it was inadequate to fulfilling colonial claims of a ‘civilizing mission’ or, later, a project of ‘development’. In this chapter, I argue that the bureaucratization of empire in Africa was a task that remained to be accomplished at the end of World War II; when colonial powers at last got serious about the task, the result was not a consolidation of their power. On the contrary, it was during the attempt to modernize imperial rule that the British and French empires unravelled. Beginning in the late 1930s, and especially after World War II, British and French governments developed a new administrative structure to take a more active role in economic development. My chapter takes as its principal case study the Inspection du Travail in French West Africa, with some comparisons to the labour officers of British Africa. Getting people to work in a productive and orderly fashion was, for obvious reasons, of great importance to imperial regimes, and both the lateness of the attempt to systematize control of labour and the urgency with which that effort was finally undertaken are striking. Here we have a set of officials, marginalized in pre-war Africa, who were empowered after the war.",
    author = "Frederick Cooper",
    year = "2016",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9781316694312.017",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9781107166035",
    pages = "391--411",
    booktitle = "Empires and Bureaucracy in World History",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - From chief to technocrat

    T2 - Labour and colonial authority in post–World War II Africa

    AU - Cooper, Frederick

    PY - 2016/1/1

    Y1 - 2016/1/1

    N2 - If the nineteenth century was supposed to be the age of bureaucratization in Europe, then the empires that European powers established in Africa at the end of that century should have marked the highpoint of the relationship of bureaucracy to empire. On paper, such appeared to be the case. Governors, provincial commissioners, district commissioners and district officers administered clearly marked territories as part of a civil service carefully recruited and supervised. But the realities of colonial administration were otherwise. The local official was, in the French expression, le roi de la brousse (‘king of the brush’). His authority depended on relations with local elites, referred to as chiefs; while chiefs were subject to sanctions, they knew that white officials depended on them to collect taxes, recruit soldiers and round up young men for forced labour. Day-to-day administration relied on layers of tacit understandings between European officials and local authorities, with another layer of translators, clerks and guards beneath them; colonial courts and military force were to be used only as needed. This system kept Africa fragmented enough that challenges could be contained for a time, but it was inadequate to fulfilling colonial claims of a ‘civilizing mission’ or, later, a project of ‘development’. In this chapter, I argue that the bureaucratization of empire in Africa was a task that remained to be accomplished at the end of World War II; when colonial powers at last got serious about the task, the result was not a consolidation of their power. On the contrary, it was during the attempt to modernize imperial rule that the British and French empires unravelled. Beginning in the late 1930s, and especially after World War II, British and French governments developed a new administrative structure to take a more active role in economic development. My chapter takes as its principal case study the Inspection du Travail in French West Africa, with some comparisons to the labour officers of British Africa. Getting people to work in a productive and orderly fashion was, for obvious reasons, of great importance to imperial regimes, and both the lateness of the attempt to systematize control of labour and the urgency with which that effort was finally undertaken are striking. Here we have a set of officials, marginalized in pre-war Africa, who were empowered after the war.

    AB - If the nineteenth century was supposed to be the age of bureaucratization in Europe, then the empires that European powers established in Africa at the end of that century should have marked the highpoint of the relationship of bureaucracy to empire. On paper, such appeared to be the case. Governors, provincial commissioners, district commissioners and district officers administered clearly marked territories as part of a civil service carefully recruited and supervised. But the realities of colonial administration were otherwise. The local official was, in the French expression, le roi de la brousse (‘king of the brush’). His authority depended on relations with local elites, referred to as chiefs; while chiefs were subject to sanctions, they knew that white officials depended on them to collect taxes, recruit soldiers and round up young men for forced labour. Day-to-day administration relied on layers of tacit understandings between European officials and local authorities, with another layer of translators, clerks and guards beneath them; colonial courts and military force were to be used only as needed. This system kept Africa fragmented enough that challenges could be contained for a time, but it was inadequate to fulfilling colonial claims of a ‘civilizing mission’ or, later, a project of ‘development’. In this chapter, I argue that the bureaucratization of empire in Africa was a task that remained to be accomplished at the end of World War II; when colonial powers at last got serious about the task, the result was not a consolidation of their power. On the contrary, it was during the attempt to modernize imperial rule that the British and French empires unravelled. Beginning in the late 1930s, and especially after World War II, British and French governments developed a new administrative structure to take a more active role in economic development. My chapter takes as its principal case study the Inspection du Travail in French West Africa, with some comparisons to the labour officers of British Africa. Getting people to work in a productive and orderly fashion was, for obvious reasons, of great importance to imperial regimes, and both the lateness of the attempt to systematize control of labour and the urgency with which that effort was finally undertaken are striking. Here we have a set of officials, marginalized in pre-war Africa, who were empowered after the war.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048447223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048447223&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781316694312.017

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9781316694312.017

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781107166035

    SP - 391

    EP - 411

    BT - Empires and Bureaucracy in World History

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -