Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance

Anne-Laure Fayard, Emmanouil Gkeredakis, Natalia Levina

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This paper examines how an organization's culture, and in particular its stance toward the pursuit of knowledge and innovation, matters when confronting new digitally enabled practices for generating novel insights. We draw on an in-depth interpretive study of how two innovation consulting firms encountered crowdsourcing for innovation. Our findings suggest that, although both organizations relied on a similar set of organizational arrangements in their daily consulting work, they enacted different positions vis-à-vis crowdsourcing: one firm further experimented with it, whereas the other rejected it altogether. These different positions emerged as organizational actors examined, framed, and evaluated crowdsourcing as an alternative for generating knowledge. To interpret these findings, we draw on philosophy of science and develop the concept of organizational epistemic stance, defined as an attitude that organizational actors collectively enact in pursuing knowledge. Our analysis suggests that when organizational actors encounter and explore information technology-enabled practices, such as crowdsourcing and big data analytics, they are likely to remain committed to their epistemic stance to frame such practices and judge their potential value for pursuing knowledge. This paper contributes to our understanding of encounters with, and adoption and diffusion of, new organizational practices and offers new ways of thinking about crowdsourcing.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)302-323
    Number of pages22
    JournalInformation Systems Research
    Volume27
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Innovation
    innovation
    management counsulting
    firm
    Information technology
    philosophy of science
    information technology
    Consulting
    Big data
    Philosophy of science
    Organizational practices
    Organization culture
    Interpretive

    Keywords

    • Crowdsourcing
    • Epistemic stance
    • Innovation
    • Interpretive research
    • IT innovation adoption
    • Knowledge creation
    • Organizational culture
    • Philosophy of science

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Information Systems
    • Computer Networks and Communications
    • Information Systems and Management
    • Library and Information Sciences

    Cite this

    Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. / Fayard, Anne-Laure; Gkeredakis, Emmanouil; Levina, Natalia.

    In: Information Systems Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, 01.06.2016, p. 302-323.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Fayard, Anne-Laure ; Gkeredakis, Emmanouil ; Levina, Natalia. / Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance. In: Information Systems Research. 2016 ; Vol. 27, No. 2. pp. 302-323.
    @article{e5c233fa9e4e460daaec20cbadce02f2,
    title = "Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance",
    abstract = "This paper examines how an organization's culture, and in particular its stance toward the pursuit of knowledge and innovation, matters when confronting new digitally enabled practices for generating novel insights. We draw on an in-depth interpretive study of how two innovation consulting firms encountered crowdsourcing for innovation. Our findings suggest that, although both organizations relied on a similar set of organizational arrangements in their daily consulting work, they enacted different positions vis-{\`a}-vis crowdsourcing: one firm further experimented with it, whereas the other rejected it altogether. These different positions emerged as organizational actors examined, framed, and evaluated crowdsourcing as an alternative for generating knowledge. To interpret these findings, we draw on philosophy of science and develop the concept of organizational epistemic stance, defined as an attitude that organizational actors collectively enact in pursuing knowledge. Our analysis suggests that when organizational actors encounter and explore information technology-enabled practices, such as crowdsourcing and big data analytics, they are likely to remain committed to their epistemic stance to frame such practices and judge their potential value for pursuing knowledge. This paper contributes to our understanding of encounters with, and adoption and diffusion of, new organizational practices and offers new ways of thinking about crowdsourcing.",
    keywords = "Crowdsourcing, Epistemic stance, Innovation, Interpretive research, IT innovation adoption, Knowledge creation, Organizational culture, Philosophy of science",
    author = "Anne-Laure Fayard and Emmanouil Gkeredakis and Natalia Levina",
    year = "2016",
    month = "6",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1287/isre.2016.0623",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "27",
    pages = "302--323",
    journal = "Information Systems Research",
    issn = "1047-7047",
    publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Framing innovation opportunities while staying committed to an organizational epistemic stance

    AU - Fayard, Anne-Laure

    AU - Gkeredakis, Emmanouil

    AU - Levina, Natalia

    PY - 2016/6/1

    Y1 - 2016/6/1

    N2 - This paper examines how an organization's culture, and in particular its stance toward the pursuit of knowledge and innovation, matters when confronting new digitally enabled practices for generating novel insights. We draw on an in-depth interpretive study of how two innovation consulting firms encountered crowdsourcing for innovation. Our findings suggest that, although both organizations relied on a similar set of organizational arrangements in their daily consulting work, they enacted different positions vis-à-vis crowdsourcing: one firm further experimented with it, whereas the other rejected it altogether. These different positions emerged as organizational actors examined, framed, and evaluated crowdsourcing as an alternative for generating knowledge. To interpret these findings, we draw on philosophy of science and develop the concept of organizational epistemic stance, defined as an attitude that organizational actors collectively enact in pursuing knowledge. Our analysis suggests that when organizational actors encounter and explore information technology-enabled practices, such as crowdsourcing and big data analytics, they are likely to remain committed to their epistemic stance to frame such practices and judge their potential value for pursuing knowledge. This paper contributes to our understanding of encounters with, and adoption and diffusion of, new organizational practices and offers new ways of thinking about crowdsourcing.

    AB - This paper examines how an organization's culture, and in particular its stance toward the pursuit of knowledge and innovation, matters when confronting new digitally enabled practices for generating novel insights. We draw on an in-depth interpretive study of how two innovation consulting firms encountered crowdsourcing for innovation. Our findings suggest that, although both organizations relied on a similar set of organizational arrangements in their daily consulting work, they enacted different positions vis-à-vis crowdsourcing: one firm further experimented with it, whereas the other rejected it altogether. These different positions emerged as organizational actors examined, framed, and evaluated crowdsourcing as an alternative for generating knowledge. To interpret these findings, we draw on philosophy of science and develop the concept of organizational epistemic stance, defined as an attitude that organizational actors collectively enact in pursuing knowledge. Our analysis suggests that when organizational actors encounter and explore information technology-enabled practices, such as crowdsourcing and big data analytics, they are likely to remain committed to their epistemic stance to frame such practices and judge their potential value for pursuing knowledge. This paper contributes to our understanding of encounters with, and adoption and diffusion of, new organizational practices and offers new ways of thinking about crowdsourcing.

    KW - Crowdsourcing

    KW - Epistemic stance

    KW - Innovation

    KW - Interpretive research

    KW - IT innovation adoption

    KW - Knowledge creation

    KW - Organizational culture

    KW - Philosophy of science

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976871592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976871592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1287/isre.2016.0623

    DO - 10.1287/isre.2016.0623

    M3 - Article

    VL - 27

    SP - 302

    EP - 323

    JO - Information Systems Research

    JF - Information Systems Research

    SN - 1047-7047

    IS - 2

    ER -