Foreword

Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement

Jeffrey Manza

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingForeword/postscript

    Abstract

    The history of democracy is marked by a series of wave-like movements, in which what happens in one place exerts influence in others. The establishment of democracy as a system of governance, with universal suffrage for all citizens (or at least male citizens), is an idea that has been around for approximately 2,500 years. However, although some variant of democracy had been practiced in a handful of polities, it was not until the late 19th century and early 20th century that democracy as a form of government suddenly became popular. The antidemocratic wave that swept Europe and Asia in the 1930s with the rise of fascism did away with free elections; in the late 1980s and early 1990s, a new wave of democracy brought the vast majority of countries under its umbrella. The movement of democracy around the globe calls our attention to how political leaders, activists, and jurists learn from one another across national boundaries. The case of the disenfranchisement of criminal offenders is no different. For most of the history of democracy, the idea that criminals could be full members of the polity was nearly unthinkable. In particular, the prevailing view held that criminals had, by their actions, proved themselves incapable of undertaking the responsibilities of citizenship. Virtually all classical political philosophers who reflected on the question reached that conclusion, and early modern legal systems typically stripped criminal offenders of legal and political rights. However, over time, societies have begun to develop a different view of criminal offenders.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationCriminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Pagesxi-xiv
    ISBN (Electronic)9780511576713
    ISBN (Print)9780521875615
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

    Fingerprint

    democracy
    offender
    citizen
    suffrage
    jurist
    fascism
    political right
    history
    legal system
    citizenship
    election
    leader
    governance
    responsibility
    society

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Manza, J. (2009). Foreword: Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement. In Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective (pp. xi-xiv). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576713.001

    Foreword : Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement. / Manza, Jeffrey.

    Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2009. p. xi-xiv.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingForeword/postscript

    Manza, J 2009, Foreword: Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement. in Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective. Cambridge University Press, pp. xi-xiv. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576713.001
    Manza J. Foreword: Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement. In Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective. Cambridge University Press. 2009. p. xi-xiv https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576713.001
    Manza, Jeffrey. / Foreword : Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement. Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective. Cambridge University Press, 2009. pp. xi-xiv
    @inbook{5a701c6014d448dc913f39af7252dc37,
    title = "Foreword: Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement",
    abstract = "The history of democracy is marked by a series of wave-like movements, in which what happens in one place exerts influence in others. The establishment of democracy as a system of governance, with universal suffrage for all citizens (or at least male citizens), is an idea that has been around for approximately 2,500 years. However, although some variant of democracy had been practiced in a handful of polities, it was not until the late 19th century and early 20th century that democracy as a form of government suddenly became popular. The antidemocratic wave that swept Europe and Asia in the 1930s with the rise of fascism did away with free elections; in the late 1980s and early 1990s, a new wave of democracy brought the vast majority of countries under its umbrella. The movement of democracy around the globe calls our attention to how political leaders, activists, and jurists learn from one another across national boundaries. The case of the disenfranchisement of criminal offenders is no different. For most of the history of democracy, the idea that criminals could be full members of the polity was nearly unthinkable. In particular, the prevailing view held that criminals had, by their actions, proved themselves incapable of undertaking the responsibilities of citizenship. Virtually all classical political philosophers who reflected on the question reached that conclusion, and early modern legal systems typically stripped criminal offenders of legal and political rights. However, over time, societies have begun to develop a different view of criminal offenders.",
    author = "Jeffrey Manza",
    year = "2009",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511576713.001",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "9780521875615",
    pages = "xi--xiv",
    booktitle = "Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    address = "United Kingdom",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Foreword

    T2 - Waves of democracy and criminal disenfranchisement

    AU - Manza, Jeffrey

    PY - 2009/1/1

    Y1 - 2009/1/1

    N2 - The history of democracy is marked by a series of wave-like movements, in which what happens in one place exerts influence in others. The establishment of democracy as a system of governance, with universal suffrage for all citizens (or at least male citizens), is an idea that has been around for approximately 2,500 years. However, although some variant of democracy had been practiced in a handful of polities, it was not until the late 19th century and early 20th century that democracy as a form of government suddenly became popular. The antidemocratic wave that swept Europe and Asia in the 1930s with the rise of fascism did away with free elections; in the late 1980s and early 1990s, a new wave of democracy brought the vast majority of countries under its umbrella. The movement of democracy around the globe calls our attention to how political leaders, activists, and jurists learn from one another across national boundaries. The case of the disenfranchisement of criminal offenders is no different. For most of the history of democracy, the idea that criminals could be full members of the polity was nearly unthinkable. In particular, the prevailing view held that criminals had, by their actions, proved themselves incapable of undertaking the responsibilities of citizenship. Virtually all classical political philosophers who reflected on the question reached that conclusion, and early modern legal systems typically stripped criminal offenders of legal and political rights. However, over time, societies have begun to develop a different view of criminal offenders.

    AB - The history of democracy is marked by a series of wave-like movements, in which what happens in one place exerts influence in others. The establishment of democracy as a system of governance, with universal suffrage for all citizens (or at least male citizens), is an idea that has been around for approximately 2,500 years. However, although some variant of democracy had been practiced in a handful of polities, it was not until the late 19th century and early 20th century that democracy as a form of government suddenly became popular. The antidemocratic wave that swept Europe and Asia in the 1930s with the rise of fascism did away with free elections; in the late 1980s and early 1990s, a new wave of democracy brought the vast majority of countries under its umbrella. The movement of democracy around the globe calls our attention to how political leaders, activists, and jurists learn from one another across national boundaries. The case of the disenfranchisement of criminal offenders is no different. For most of the history of democracy, the idea that criminals could be full members of the polity was nearly unthinkable. In particular, the prevailing view held that criminals had, by their actions, proved themselves incapable of undertaking the responsibilities of citizenship. Virtually all classical political philosophers who reflected on the question reached that conclusion, and early modern legal systems typically stripped criminal offenders of legal and political rights. However, over time, societies have begun to develop a different view of criminal offenders.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927039189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927039189&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511576713.001

    DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511576713.001

    M3 - Foreword/postscript

    SN - 9780521875615

    SP - xi-xiv

    BT - Criminal Disenfranchisement in an International Perspective

    PB - Cambridge University Press

    ER -