For Members Only

Ingroup Punishment of Fairness Norm Violations in the Ultimatum Game

Saaid A. Mendoza, Sean P. Lane, David M. Amodio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although group membership has many privileges, members are expected to reciprocate those privileges. We tested whether in-group members would be punished more harshly than out-group members for marginal fairness norm violations within ultimatum game bargaining interactions. Participants considered monetary splits (of US$20) from in-group and out-group proposers, which ranged in proportion. Accepting an offer yielded the proposed payout; rejecting it caused each player to earn nothing-a punishment of the proposer at a personal cost. Participants exacted stricter costly punishment on racial in-group than out-group members for marginally unfair offers (Study 1), an effect that was replicated with college group membership and magnified among strong in-group identifiers (Study 2). Importantly, ultimatum game decisions were driven by fairness perceptions rather than proposer evaluations (Study 3), suggesting our effects reflected norm enforcement and not esteem preservation. These findings illuminate a previously unexplored process for maintaining group-based norms that may promote in-group favoritism.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)662-670
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume5
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Punishment
Group Processes
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • black sheep effect
  • costly punishment
  • fairness norms
  • in-group favoritism
  • ultimatum game

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

For Members Only : Ingroup Punishment of Fairness Norm Violations in the Ultimatum Game. / Mendoza, Saaid A.; Lane, Sean P.; Amodio, David M.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2014, p. 662-670.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2da2b1d0a630400baa6cda15974eba5b,
title = "For Members Only: Ingroup Punishment of Fairness Norm Violations in the Ultimatum Game",
abstract = "Although group membership has many privileges, members are expected to reciprocate those privileges. We tested whether in-group members would be punished more harshly than out-group members for marginal fairness norm violations within ultimatum game bargaining interactions. Participants considered monetary splits (of US$20) from in-group and out-group proposers, which ranged in proportion. Accepting an offer yielded the proposed payout; rejecting it caused each player to earn nothing-a punishment of the proposer at a personal cost. Participants exacted stricter costly punishment on racial in-group than out-group members for marginally unfair offers (Study 1), an effect that was replicated with college group membership and magnified among strong in-group identifiers (Study 2). Importantly, ultimatum game decisions were driven by fairness perceptions rather than proposer evaluations (Study 3), suggesting our effects reflected norm enforcement and not esteem preservation. These findings illuminate a previously unexplored process for maintaining group-based norms that may promote in-group favoritism.",
keywords = "black sheep effect, costly punishment, fairness norms, in-group favoritism, ultimatum game",
author = "Mendoza, {Saaid A.} and Lane, {Sean P.} and Amodio, {David M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1177/1948550614527115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "662--670",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - For Members Only

T2 - Ingroup Punishment of Fairness Norm Violations in the Ultimatum Game

AU - Mendoza, Saaid A.

AU - Lane, Sean P.

AU - Amodio, David M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Although group membership has many privileges, members are expected to reciprocate those privileges. We tested whether in-group members would be punished more harshly than out-group members for marginal fairness norm violations within ultimatum game bargaining interactions. Participants considered monetary splits (of US$20) from in-group and out-group proposers, which ranged in proportion. Accepting an offer yielded the proposed payout; rejecting it caused each player to earn nothing-a punishment of the proposer at a personal cost. Participants exacted stricter costly punishment on racial in-group than out-group members for marginally unfair offers (Study 1), an effect that was replicated with college group membership and magnified among strong in-group identifiers (Study 2). Importantly, ultimatum game decisions were driven by fairness perceptions rather than proposer evaluations (Study 3), suggesting our effects reflected norm enforcement and not esteem preservation. These findings illuminate a previously unexplored process for maintaining group-based norms that may promote in-group favoritism.

AB - Although group membership has many privileges, members are expected to reciprocate those privileges. We tested whether in-group members would be punished more harshly than out-group members for marginal fairness norm violations within ultimatum game bargaining interactions. Participants considered monetary splits (of US$20) from in-group and out-group proposers, which ranged in proportion. Accepting an offer yielded the proposed payout; rejecting it caused each player to earn nothing-a punishment of the proposer at a personal cost. Participants exacted stricter costly punishment on racial in-group than out-group members for marginally unfair offers (Study 1), an effect that was replicated with college group membership and magnified among strong in-group identifiers (Study 2). Importantly, ultimatum game decisions were driven by fairness perceptions rather than proposer evaluations (Study 3), suggesting our effects reflected norm enforcement and not esteem preservation. These findings illuminate a previously unexplored process for maintaining group-based norms that may promote in-group favoritism.

KW - black sheep effect

KW - costly punishment

KW - fairness norms

KW - in-group favoritism

KW - ultimatum game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84903536600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84903536600&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550614527115

DO - 10.1177/1948550614527115

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 662

EP - 670

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 6

ER -