Financing sustainable infrastructure: Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Infrastructure investment is critical to sustainable infrastructure. The often diverse infrastructure funding sources and levels are evaluated here. The diversity reflects differences and uncertainties in goals under normal and emergency conditions as well as funding availability. For example, for Hurricane Sandy, infrastructure funding drew from special appropriations, disaster relief, mutual assistance agreements, capital budgets, philanthropy, and insurance. The approaches applied here draw from selected public financial databases to understand variability of financing attributes for different infrastructure goals. First, selected funds for (1) traditional capital budgeting/government processes; and (2) emergency funding and allocations before and after weather-related disasters are identified and compared. Second, different funding sources are identified along with patterns and trends in national, state and local public funding levels and types of infrastructure funded (e.g., gray/green). Third, infrastructure financing characteristics are evaluated in the context of infrastructure goals and their indicators. Goals and indicators include operational performance, service quality, social equity, cost, environmental concerns, vulnerability, resilience, experience with extreme weather, the size, scale and geographic coverage of projects, support of proximate land development, and uncertainty. Sustainability-focused infrastructure indicators are drawn from recent compilations, e.g., the National Academies and National Climate Assessment. The sensitivity of the types, levels and distribution of financial resources to infrastructure goals and related indicators is emphasized. This research provides insights into and implications for infrastructure financing under different conditions and objectives as inputs to financial decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017
Subtitle of host publicationPolicy, Finance, and Education - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017
PublisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Pages176-187
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)9780784481202
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Event2017 International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure: Policy, Finance, and Education, ICSI 2017 - New York, United States
Duration: Oct 26 2017Oct 28 2017

Other

Other2017 International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure: Policy, Finance, and Education, ICSI 2017
CountryUnited States
CityNew York
Period10/26/1710/28/17

Fingerprint

Disasters
Budget control
Hurricanes
Insurance
Sustainable development
Decision making
Availability
Costs
Uncertainty
Financial resources
Disaster
Financing
Funding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Cite this

Zimmerman, R. (2017). Financing sustainable infrastructure: Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources. In International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017: Policy, Finance, and Education - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017 (pp. 176-187). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481202.017

Financing sustainable infrastructure : Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources. / Zimmerman, Rae.

International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017: Policy, Finance, and Education - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017. p. 176-187.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Zimmerman, R 2017, Financing sustainable infrastructure: Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources. in International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017: Policy, Finance, and Education - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), pp. 176-187, 2017 International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure: Policy, Finance, and Education, ICSI 2017, New York, United States, 10/26/17. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481202.017
Zimmerman R. Financing sustainable infrastructure: Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources. In International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017: Policy, Finance, and Education - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2017. p. 176-187 https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481202.017
Zimmerman, Rae. / Financing sustainable infrastructure : Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources. International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017: Policy, Finance, and Education - Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2017. pp. 176-187
@inproceedings{36ed58e891d4409f94aa1fef3b5dcd8d,
title = "Financing sustainable infrastructure: Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources",
abstract = "Infrastructure investment is critical to sustainable infrastructure. The often diverse infrastructure funding sources and levels are evaluated here. The diversity reflects differences and uncertainties in goals under normal and emergency conditions as well as funding availability. For example, for Hurricane Sandy, infrastructure funding drew from special appropriations, disaster relief, mutual assistance agreements, capital budgets, philanthropy, and insurance. The approaches applied here draw from selected public financial databases to understand variability of financing attributes for different infrastructure goals. First, selected funds for (1) traditional capital budgeting/government processes; and (2) emergency funding and allocations before and after weather-related disasters are identified and compared. Second, different funding sources are identified along with patterns and trends in national, state and local public funding levels and types of infrastructure funded (e.g., gray/green). Third, infrastructure financing characteristics are evaluated in the context of infrastructure goals and their indicators. Goals and indicators include operational performance, service quality, social equity, cost, environmental concerns, vulnerability, resilience, experience with extreme weather, the size, scale and geographic coverage of projects, support of proximate land development, and uncertainty. Sustainability-focused infrastructure indicators are drawn from recent compilations, e.g., the National Academies and National Climate Assessment. The sensitivity of the types, levels and distribution of financial resources to infrastructure goals and related indicators is emphasized. This research provides insights into and implications for infrastructure financing under different conditions and objectives as inputs to financial decision-making.",
author = "Rae Zimmerman",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/9780784481202.017",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "176--187",
booktitle = "International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Financing sustainable infrastructure

T2 - Reconciling disaster and traditional financial resources

AU - Zimmerman, Rae

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Infrastructure investment is critical to sustainable infrastructure. The often diverse infrastructure funding sources and levels are evaluated here. The diversity reflects differences and uncertainties in goals under normal and emergency conditions as well as funding availability. For example, for Hurricane Sandy, infrastructure funding drew from special appropriations, disaster relief, mutual assistance agreements, capital budgets, philanthropy, and insurance. The approaches applied here draw from selected public financial databases to understand variability of financing attributes for different infrastructure goals. First, selected funds for (1) traditional capital budgeting/government processes; and (2) emergency funding and allocations before and after weather-related disasters are identified and compared. Second, different funding sources are identified along with patterns and trends in national, state and local public funding levels and types of infrastructure funded (e.g., gray/green). Third, infrastructure financing characteristics are evaluated in the context of infrastructure goals and their indicators. Goals and indicators include operational performance, service quality, social equity, cost, environmental concerns, vulnerability, resilience, experience with extreme weather, the size, scale and geographic coverage of projects, support of proximate land development, and uncertainty. Sustainability-focused infrastructure indicators are drawn from recent compilations, e.g., the National Academies and National Climate Assessment. The sensitivity of the types, levels and distribution of financial resources to infrastructure goals and related indicators is emphasized. This research provides insights into and implications for infrastructure financing under different conditions and objectives as inputs to financial decision-making.

AB - Infrastructure investment is critical to sustainable infrastructure. The often diverse infrastructure funding sources and levels are evaluated here. The diversity reflects differences and uncertainties in goals under normal and emergency conditions as well as funding availability. For example, for Hurricane Sandy, infrastructure funding drew from special appropriations, disaster relief, mutual assistance agreements, capital budgets, philanthropy, and insurance. The approaches applied here draw from selected public financial databases to understand variability of financing attributes for different infrastructure goals. First, selected funds for (1) traditional capital budgeting/government processes; and (2) emergency funding and allocations before and after weather-related disasters are identified and compared. Second, different funding sources are identified along with patterns and trends in national, state and local public funding levels and types of infrastructure funded (e.g., gray/green). Third, infrastructure financing characteristics are evaluated in the context of infrastructure goals and their indicators. Goals and indicators include operational performance, service quality, social equity, cost, environmental concerns, vulnerability, resilience, experience with extreme weather, the size, scale and geographic coverage of projects, support of proximate land development, and uncertainty. Sustainability-focused infrastructure indicators are drawn from recent compilations, e.g., the National Academies and National Climate Assessment. The sensitivity of the types, levels and distribution of financial resources to infrastructure goals and related indicators is emphasized. This research provides insights into and implications for infrastructure financing under different conditions and objectives as inputs to financial decision-making.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035204138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035204138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/9780784481202.017

DO - 10.1061/9780784481202.017

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:85035204138

SP - 176

EP - 187

BT - International Conference on Sustainable Infrastructure 2017

PB - American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

ER -