Field instructor turnover

Dina J. Rosenfeld

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)187-218
    Number of pages32
    JournalClinical Supervisor
    Volume6
    Issue number3-4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 10 1989

    Fingerprint

    turnover
    instructor
    Students
    Boredom
    boredom
    university
    student
    Reward
    reward
    Teaching
    profession
    Learning
    instruction
    learning

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Clinical Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Field instructor turnover. / Rosenfeld, Dina J.

    In: Clinical Supervisor, Vol. 6, No. 3-4, 10.01.1989, p. 187-218.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Rosenfeld, DJ 1989, 'Field instructor turnover', Clinical Supervisor, vol. 6, no. 3-4, pp. 187-218. https://doi.org/10.1300/J001v06n03_15
    Rosenfeld, Dina J. / Field instructor turnover. In: Clinical Supervisor. 1989 ; Vol. 6, No. 3-4. pp. 187-218.
    @article{496b1a99954b48c78e7dc2e3c33cdb7e,
    title = "Field instructor turnover",
    abstract = "This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.",
    author = "Rosenfeld, {Dina J.}",
    year = "1989",
    month = "1",
    day = "10",
    doi = "10.1300/J001v06n03_15",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "187--218",
    journal = "The Clinical Supervisor",
    issn = "0732-5223",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3-4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Field instructor turnover

    AU - Rosenfeld, Dina J.

    PY - 1989/1/10

    Y1 - 1989/1/10

    N2 - This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.

    AB - This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3142549867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3142549867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1300/J001v06n03_15

    DO - 10.1300/J001v06n03_15

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:3142549867

    VL - 6

    SP - 187

    EP - 218

    JO - The Clinical Supervisor

    JF - The Clinical Supervisor

    SN - 0732-5223

    IS - 3-4

    ER -