Field instructor turnover

Dina J. Rosenfeld

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationEmpirical Studies in Field Instruction
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Pages187-218
    Number of pages32
    ISBN (Electronic)9781317773429
    ISBN (Print)0866568697, 9780866568692
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

    Fingerprint

    turnover
    instructor
    Students
    Boredom
    boredom
    university
    student
    Reward
    reward
    Teaching
    profession
    Learning
    instruction
    learning

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychology(all)
    • Social Sciences(all)

    Cite this

    Rosenfeld, D. J. (2014). Field instructor turnover. In Empirical Studies in Field Instruction (pp. 187-218). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315804064

    Field instructor turnover. / Rosenfeld, Dina J.

    Empirical Studies in Field Instruction. Taylor and Francis, 2014. p. 187-218.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Rosenfeld, DJ 2014, Field instructor turnover. in Empirical Studies in Field Instruction. Taylor and Francis, pp. 187-218. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315804064
    Rosenfeld DJ. Field instructor turnover. In Empirical Studies in Field Instruction. Taylor and Francis. 2014. p. 187-218 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315804064
    Rosenfeld, Dina J. / Field instructor turnover. Empirical Studies in Field Instruction. Taylor and Francis, 2014. pp. 187-218
    @inbook{131d52bf553d4cef8c2be9284dcbe389,
    title = "Field instructor turnover",
    abstract = "This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.",
    author = "Rosenfeld, {Dina J.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.4324/9781315804064",
    language = "English (US)",
    isbn = "0866568697",
    pages = "187--218",
    booktitle = "Empirical Studies in Field Instruction",
    publisher = "Taylor and Francis",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Field instructor turnover

    AU - Rosenfeld, Dina J.

    PY - 2014/1/1

    Y1 - 2014/1/1

    N2 - This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.

    AB - This study examined the turnover of field instructors in relation to agency and university support, and to the intrinsic satisfaction from field instruction. As expected, both agency and university supports positively influenced the decision of field instructors to continue taking students. The intrinsic rewards that evolved from the content of the work were: teaching and sharpening practice skills; learning new ideas; contributing to the profession; and relieving the boredom of the job. As hypothesized, all the above variables correlated positively with the plans of field instructors to take students the next year. The quality of the student correlated with all the major variables of the study.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84953479597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84953479597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.4324/9781315804064

    DO - 10.4324/9781315804064

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 0866568697

    SN - 9780866568692

    SP - 187

    EP - 218

    BT - Empirical Studies in Field Instruction

    PB - Taylor and Francis

    ER -