Federalist No. 1

How Would Publius Define Good Government Today?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Federalist No. 1 sets the basic framework for interpreting the U.S. Constitution. It contains an implied definition of "good government" that occupied the founders as they built a stronger national government. This essay explains the conflict embedded in the debate between the two theories of good government offered by Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson and asks how the competing definitions might be reconciled with recent experience.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPublic Administration Review
Volume71
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

constitution
Government
experience
Constitution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Federalist No. 1 : How Would Publius Define Good Government Today? / Light, Paul.

In: Public Administration Review, Vol. 71, No. SUPPL. 1, 12.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{86a24a9e13d448138279cbbb4771ed22,
title = "Federalist No. 1: How Would Publius Define Good Government Today?",
abstract = "Federalist No. 1 sets the basic framework for interpreting the U.S. Constitution. It contains an implied definition of {"}good government{"} that occupied the founders as they built a stronger national government. This essay explains the conflict embedded in the debate between the two theories of good government offered by Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson and asks how the competing definitions might be reconciled with recent experience.",
author = "Paul Light",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02456.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
journal = "Public Administration Review",
issn = "0033-3352",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Federalist No. 1

T2 - How Would Publius Define Good Government Today?

AU - Light, Paul

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - Federalist No. 1 sets the basic framework for interpreting the U.S. Constitution. It contains an implied definition of "good government" that occupied the founders as they built a stronger national government. This essay explains the conflict embedded in the debate between the two theories of good government offered by Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson and asks how the competing definitions might be reconciled with recent experience.

AB - Federalist No. 1 sets the basic framework for interpreting the U.S. Constitution. It contains an implied definition of "good government" that occupied the founders as they built a stronger national government. This essay explains the conflict embedded in the debate between the two theories of good government offered by Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson and asks how the competing definitions might be reconciled with recent experience.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81255143689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81255143689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02456.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02456.x

M3 - Article

VL - 71

JO - Public Administration Review

JF - Public Administration Review

SN - 0033-3352

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -