Fear in infancy: Lessons from snakes, spiders, heights, and strangers

Vanessa LoBue, Karen Adolph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This review challenges the traditional interpretation of infants' and young children's responses to three types of potentially "fear-inducing" stimuli-snakes and spiders, heights, and strangers. The traditional account is that these stimuli are the objects of infants' earliest developing fears. We present evidence against the traditional account, and provide an alternative explanation of infants' behaviors toward each stimulus. Specifically, we propose that behaviors typically interpreted as "fearful" really reflect an array of stimulus-specific responses that are highly dependent on context, learning, and the perceptual features of the stimuli. We speculate about why researchers so commonly misinterpret these behaviors, and conclude with future directions for studying the development of fear in infants and young children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1889-1907
Number of pages19
JournalDevelopmental psychology
Volume55
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2019

Fingerprint

Spiders
Snakes
Fear
stimulus
anxiety
infant
Infant Behavior
Research Personnel
Learning
interpretation
learning
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Demography
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

Fear in infancy : Lessons from snakes, spiders, heights, and strangers. / LoBue, Vanessa; Adolph, Karen.

In: Developmental psychology, Vol. 55, No. 9, 01.09.2019, p. 1889-1907.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc660e402457412ba77297631778dd2e,
title = "Fear in infancy: Lessons from snakes, spiders, heights, and strangers",
abstract = "This review challenges the traditional interpretation of infants' and young children's responses to three types of potentially {"}fear-inducing{"} stimuli-snakes and spiders, heights, and strangers. The traditional account is that these stimuli are the objects of infants' earliest developing fears. We present evidence against the traditional account, and provide an alternative explanation of infants' behaviors toward each stimulus. Specifically, we propose that behaviors typically interpreted as {"}fearful{"} really reflect an array of stimulus-specific responses that are highly dependent on context, learning, and the perceptual features of the stimuli. We speculate about why researchers so commonly misinterpret these behaviors, and conclude with future directions for studying the development of fear in infants and young children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).",
author = "Vanessa LoBue and Karen Adolph",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/dev0000675",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "1889--1907",
journal = "Developmental Psychology",
issn = "0012-1649",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fear in infancy

T2 - Lessons from snakes, spiders, heights, and strangers

AU - LoBue, Vanessa

AU - Adolph, Karen

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - This review challenges the traditional interpretation of infants' and young children's responses to three types of potentially "fear-inducing" stimuli-snakes and spiders, heights, and strangers. The traditional account is that these stimuli are the objects of infants' earliest developing fears. We present evidence against the traditional account, and provide an alternative explanation of infants' behaviors toward each stimulus. Specifically, we propose that behaviors typically interpreted as "fearful" really reflect an array of stimulus-specific responses that are highly dependent on context, learning, and the perceptual features of the stimuli. We speculate about why researchers so commonly misinterpret these behaviors, and conclude with future directions for studying the development of fear in infants and young children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - This review challenges the traditional interpretation of infants' and young children's responses to three types of potentially "fear-inducing" stimuli-snakes and spiders, heights, and strangers. The traditional account is that these stimuli are the objects of infants' earliest developing fears. We present evidence against the traditional account, and provide an alternative explanation of infants' behaviors toward each stimulus. Specifically, we propose that behaviors typically interpreted as "fearful" really reflect an array of stimulus-specific responses that are highly dependent on context, learning, and the perceptual features of the stimuli. We speculate about why researchers so commonly misinterpret these behaviors, and conclude with future directions for studying the development of fear in infants and young children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071633311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071633311&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/dev0000675

DO - 10.1037/dev0000675

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 1889

EP - 1907

JO - Developmental Psychology

JF - Developmental Psychology

SN - 0012-1649

IS - 9

ER -