Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself

Oriel FeldmanHall, Peter Sokol-Hessner, Jay J. Van Bavel, Elizabeth A. Phelps

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Classic psychology and economic studies argue that punishment is the standard response to violations of fairness norms. Typically, individuals are presented with the option to punish the transgressor or not. However, such a narrow choice set may fail to capture stronger alternative preferences for restoring justice. Here we show, in contrast to the majority of findings on social punishment, that other forms of justice restoration (for example, compensation to the victim) are strongly preferred to punitive measures. Furthermore, these alternative preferences for restoring justice depend on the perspective of the deciding agent. When people are the recipient of an unfair offer, they prefer to compensate themselves without seeking retribution, even when punishment is free. Yet when people observe a fairness violation targeted at another, they change their decision to the most punitive option. Together these findings indicate that humans prefer alternative forms of justice restoration to punishment alone.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number5306
JournalNature Communications
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Punishment
Social Justice
Restoration
restoration
psychology
norms
Economics
economics
Compensation and Redress
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Chemistry(all)
  • Physics and Astronomy(all)

Cite this

Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself. / FeldmanHall, Oriel; Sokol-Hessner, Peter; Van Bavel, Jay J.; Phelps, Elizabeth A.

In: Nature Communications, Vol. 5, 5306, 2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{267af2323bac4a8588c03b433b0cef00,
title = "Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself",
abstract = "Classic psychology and economic studies argue that punishment is the standard response to violations of fairness norms. Typically, individuals are presented with the option to punish the transgressor or not. However, such a narrow choice set may fail to capture stronger alternative preferences for restoring justice. Here we show, in contrast to the majority of findings on social punishment, that other forms of justice restoration (for example, compensation to the victim) are strongly preferred to punitive measures. Furthermore, these alternative preferences for restoring justice depend on the perspective of the deciding agent. When people are the recipient of an unfair offer, they prefer to compensate themselves without seeking retribution, even when punishment is free. Yet when people observe a fairness violation targeted at another, they change their decision to the most punitive option. Together these findings indicate that humans prefer alternative forms of justice restoration to punishment alone.",
author = "Oriel FeldmanHall and Peter Sokol-Hessner and {Van Bavel}, {Jay J.} and Phelps, {Elizabeth A.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1038/ncomms6306",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Nature Communications",
issn = "2041-1723",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fairness violations elicit greater punishment on behalf of another than for oneself

AU - FeldmanHall, Oriel

AU - Sokol-Hessner, Peter

AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.

AU - Phelps, Elizabeth A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Classic psychology and economic studies argue that punishment is the standard response to violations of fairness norms. Typically, individuals are presented with the option to punish the transgressor or not. However, such a narrow choice set may fail to capture stronger alternative preferences for restoring justice. Here we show, in contrast to the majority of findings on social punishment, that other forms of justice restoration (for example, compensation to the victim) are strongly preferred to punitive measures. Furthermore, these alternative preferences for restoring justice depend on the perspective of the deciding agent. When people are the recipient of an unfair offer, they prefer to compensate themselves without seeking retribution, even when punishment is free. Yet when people observe a fairness violation targeted at another, they change their decision to the most punitive option. Together these findings indicate that humans prefer alternative forms of justice restoration to punishment alone.

AB - Classic psychology and economic studies argue that punishment is the standard response to violations of fairness norms. Typically, individuals are presented with the option to punish the transgressor or not. However, such a narrow choice set may fail to capture stronger alternative preferences for restoring justice. Here we show, in contrast to the majority of findings on social punishment, that other forms of justice restoration (for example, compensation to the victim) are strongly preferred to punitive measures. Furthermore, these alternative preferences for restoring justice depend on the perspective of the deciding agent. When people are the recipient of an unfair offer, they prefer to compensate themselves without seeking retribution, even when punishment is free. Yet when people observe a fairness violation targeted at another, they change their decision to the most punitive option. Together these findings indicate that humans prefer alternative forms of justice restoration to punishment alone.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921852429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921852429&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/ncomms6306

DO - 10.1038/ncomms6306

M3 - Article

C2 - 25350814

AN - SCOPUS:84921852429

VL - 5

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

SN - 2041-1723

M1 - 5306

ER -