Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take

Ernesto Reuben, Frans van Winden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This experimental study investigates how behavior changes after receiving punishment. The focus is on how proposers in a power-to-take game adjust their behavior depending on their fairness perceptions, their experienced emotions, and their interaction with responders. We find that fairness plays an important role: proposers who take what they consider to be an unfair amount experience higher intensities of prosocial emotions (shame and guilt), particularly if they are punished. This emotional experience induces proposers to lower their claims. We also find that fairness perceptions vary considerably between individuals. Therefore, it is not necessarily the case that proposers who considered themselves fair are taking less from responders than other proposers. Lastly, we provide evidence that suggests that eliciting emotions through self-reports does not affect subsequent behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)908-922
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2010

Fingerprint

fairness
Emotions
emotion
Shame
Guilt
Punishment
shame
guilt
Self Report
penalty
experience
interaction
evidence
Power (Psychology)
Emotion
Fairness perceptions

Keywords

  • Fairness
  • Guilt
  • Power-to-take game
  • Proposers
  • Prosocial emotions
  • Punishment
  • Shame

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take. / Reuben, Ernesto; van Winden, Frans.

In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 6, 01.12.2010, p. 908-922.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a9e1b636dca14640a3de6fba4db13d98,
title = "Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take",
abstract = "This experimental study investigates how behavior changes after receiving punishment. The focus is on how proposers in a power-to-take game adjust their behavior depending on their fairness perceptions, their experienced emotions, and their interaction with responders. We find that fairness plays an important role: proposers who take what they consider to be an unfair amount experience higher intensities of prosocial emotions (shame and guilt), particularly if they are punished. This emotional experience induces proposers to lower their claims. We also find that fairness perceptions vary considerably between individuals. Therefore, it is not necessarily the case that proposers who considered themselves fair are taking less from responders than other proposers. Lastly, we provide evidence that suggests that eliciting emotions through self-reports does not affect subsequent behavior.",
keywords = "Fairness, Guilt, Power-to-take game, Proposers, Prosocial emotions, Punishment, Shame",
author = "Ernesto Reuben and {van Winden}, Frans",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2010.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "908--922",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fairness perceptions and prosocial emotions in the power to take

AU - Reuben, Ernesto

AU - van Winden, Frans

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - This experimental study investigates how behavior changes after receiving punishment. The focus is on how proposers in a power-to-take game adjust their behavior depending on their fairness perceptions, their experienced emotions, and their interaction with responders. We find that fairness plays an important role: proposers who take what they consider to be an unfair amount experience higher intensities of prosocial emotions (shame and guilt), particularly if they are punished. This emotional experience induces proposers to lower their claims. We also find that fairness perceptions vary considerably between individuals. Therefore, it is not necessarily the case that proposers who considered themselves fair are taking less from responders than other proposers. Lastly, we provide evidence that suggests that eliciting emotions through self-reports does not affect subsequent behavior.

AB - This experimental study investigates how behavior changes after receiving punishment. The focus is on how proposers in a power-to-take game adjust their behavior depending on their fairness perceptions, their experienced emotions, and their interaction with responders. We find that fairness plays an important role: proposers who take what they consider to be an unfair amount experience higher intensities of prosocial emotions (shame and guilt), particularly if they are punished. This emotional experience induces proposers to lower their claims. We also find that fairness perceptions vary considerably between individuals. Therefore, it is not necessarily the case that proposers who considered themselves fair are taking less from responders than other proposers. Lastly, we provide evidence that suggests that eliciting emotions through self-reports does not affect subsequent behavior.

KW - Fairness

KW - Guilt

KW - Power-to-take game

KW - Proposers

KW - Prosocial emotions

KW - Punishment

KW - Shame

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78449297180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78449297180&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2010.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2010.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 908

EP - 922

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

IS - 6

ER -