Eye regression in blind Astyanax cavefish may facilitate the evolution of an adaptive behavior and its sensory receptors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The forces driving the evolutionary loss or simplification of traits such as vision and pigmentation in cave animals are still debated. Three alternative hypotheses are direct selection against the trait, genetic drift, and indirect selection due to antagonistic pleiotropy. Recent work establishes that Astyanax cavefish exhibit vibration attraction behavior (VAB), a presumed behavioral adaptation to finding food in the dark not exhibited by surface fish. Genetic analysis revealed two regions in the genome with quantitative trait loci (QTL) for both VAB and eye size. These observations were interpreted as genetic evidence that selection for VAB indirectly drove eye regression through antagonistic pleiotropy and, further, that this is a general mechanism to account for regressive evolution. These conclusions are unsupported by the data; the analysis fails to establish pleiotropy and ignores the numerous other QTL that map to, and potentially interact, in the same regions. It is likely that all three forces drive evolutionary change. We will be able to distinguish among them in individual cases only when we have identified the causative alleles and characterized their effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number81
JournalBMC Biology
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 11 2013

Fingerprint

pleiotropy
sensory receptors
Caves
Psychological Adaptation
Sensory Receptor Cells
Vibration
vibration
Fish
Animals
Genes
eyes
Quantitative Trait Loci
quantitative trait loci
Genetic Drift
genetic drift
Pigmentation
genetic analysis
caves
pigmentation
cave

Keywords

  • Antagonistic pleiotropy
  • Astyanax
  • Cavefish
  • Eye loss
  • QTL
  • Regressive evolution
  • VAB

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Biotechnology
  • Structural Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Plant Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Cell Biology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences(all)

Cite this

@article{ebbc5a03c2024f63bf55971b6ec6658b,
title = "Eye regression in blind Astyanax cavefish may facilitate the evolution of an adaptive behavior and its sensory receptors",
abstract = "The forces driving the evolutionary loss or simplification of traits such as vision and pigmentation in cave animals are still debated. Three alternative hypotheses are direct selection against the trait, genetic drift, and indirect selection due to antagonistic pleiotropy. Recent work establishes that Astyanax cavefish exhibit vibration attraction behavior (VAB), a presumed behavioral adaptation to finding food in the dark not exhibited by surface fish. Genetic analysis revealed two regions in the genome with quantitative trait loci (QTL) for both VAB and eye size. These observations were interpreted as genetic evidence that selection for VAB indirectly drove eye regression through antagonistic pleiotropy and, further, that this is a general mechanism to account for regressive evolution. These conclusions are unsupported by the data; the analysis fails to establish pleiotropy and ignores the numerous other QTL that map to, and potentially interact, in the same regions. It is likely that all three forces drive evolutionary change. We will be able to distinguish among them in individual cases only when we have identified the causative alleles and characterized their effects.",
keywords = "Antagonistic pleiotropy, Astyanax, Cavefish, Eye loss, QTL, Regressive evolution, VAB",
author = "Richard Borowsky",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1186/1741-7007-11-81",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Biology",
issn = "1741-7007",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eye regression in blind Astyanax cavefish may facilitate the evolution of an adaptive behavior and its sensory receptors

AU - Borowsky, Richard

PY - 2013/7/11

Y1 - 2013/7/11

N2 - The forces driving the evolutionary loss or simplification of traits such as vision and pigmentation in cave animals are still debated. Three alternative hypotheses are direct selection against the trait, genetic drift, and indirect selection due to antagonistic pleiotropy. Recent work establishes that Astyanax cavefish exhibit vibration attraction behavior (VAB), a presumed behavioral adaptation to finding food in the dark not exhibited by surface fish. Genetic analysis revealed two regions in the genome with quantitative trait loci (QTL) for both VAB and eye size. These observations were interpreted as genetic evidence that selection for VAB indirectly drove eye regression through antagonistic pleiotropy and, further, that this is a general mechanism to account for regressive evolution. These conclusions are unsupported by the data; the analysis fails to establish pleiotropy and ignores the numerous other QTL that map to, and potentially interact, in the same regions. It is likely that all three forces drive evolutionary change. We will be able to distinguish among them in individual cases only when we have identified the causative alleles and characterized their effects.

AB - The forces driving the evolutionary loss or simplification of traits such as vision and pigmentation in cave animals are still debated. Three alternative hypotheses are direct selection against the trait, genetic drift, and indirect selection due to antagonistic pleiotropy. Recent work establishes that Astyanax cavefish exhibit vibration attraction behavior (VAB), a presumed behavioral adaptation to finding food in the dark not exhibited by surface fish. Genetic analysis revealed two regions in the genome with quantitative trait loci (QTL) for both VAB and eye size. These observations were interpreted as genetic evidence that selection for VAB indirectly drove eye regression through antagonistic pleiotropy and, further, that this is a general mechanism to account for regressive evolution. These conclusions are unsupported by the data; the analysis fails to establish pleiotropy and ignores the numerous other QTL that map to, and potentially interact, in the same regions. It is likely that all three forces drive evolutionary change. We will be able to distinguish among them in individual cases only when we have identified the causative alleles and characterized their effects.

KW - Antagonistic pleiotropy

KW - Astyanax

KW - Cavefish

KW - Eye loss

KW - QTL

KW - Regressive evolution

KW - VAB

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880003673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880003673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1741-7007-11-81

DO - 10.1186/1741-7007-11-81

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - BMC Biology

JF - BMC Biology

SN - 1741-7007

M1 - 81

ER -