Extent and determinants of discrepancy between self-evaluations of weight status and clinical standards

Virginia W. Chang, Nicholas A. Christakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent and type of discordance between personal and medical classifications of weight status, and to examine the influence of sociodemographic factors on the misclassification of weight status. DESIGN/SETTING: The 1991 Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the U.S. population. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 18 years and older (N = 41,676). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents' self-evaluations of weight status were compared to classification of their body mass index (BMI) by medical standards. Twenty-nine percent of respondents incorrectly classified their weight status relative to medical standards, and the nature of this error was variable. While 27.4% of overweight persons judged their weight to be "just about right," of those who did judge themselves to be overweight, 23.9% were in fact normal or underweight according to their BMI. Overall, 16.6% of persons underassessed their weight category, and 12.4% overassessed their weight category. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, age, race, income, education, and occupation influenced the misclassification of weight status. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of Americans deviate from medical standards in their self-evaluations of weight appropriateness, and this lack of correspondence may reflect the normative judgments of various population subgroups. Clinical and public health programs that employ a uniform strategy or approach to the population may not be efficacious.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)538-543
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of General Internal Medicine
Volume16
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Diagnostic Self Evaluation
Weights and Measures
Body Mass Index
Population
Thinness
Health Surveys
Health Promotion
Occupations
Multivariate Analysis
Public Health
Cross-Sectional Studies
Interviews
Education

Keywords

  • Body image
  • Eating disorders
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Weight perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Extent and determinants of discrepancy between self-evaluations of weight status and clinical standards. / Chang, Virginia W.; Christakis, Nicholas A.

In: Journal of General Internal Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2001, p. 538-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5b57a7204f2c4cf79ffd65cd06074dc8,
title = "Extent and determinants of discrepancy between self-evaluations of weight status and clinical standards",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent and type of discordance between personal and medical classifications of weight status, and to examine the influence of sociodemographic factors on the misclassification of weight status. DESIGN/SETTING: The 1991 Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the U.S. population. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 18 years and older (N = 41,676). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents' self-evaluations of weight status were compared to classification of their body mass index (BMI) by medical standards. Twenty-nine percent of respondents incorrectly classified their weight status relative to medical standards, and the nature of this error was variable. While 27.4{\%} of overweight persons judged their weight to be {"}just about right,{"} of those who did judge themselves to be overweight, 23.9{\%} were in fact normal or underweight according to their BMI. Overall, 16.6{\%} of persons underassessed their weight category, and 12.4{\%} overassessed their weight category. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, age, race, income, education, and occupation influenced the misclassification of weight status. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of Americans deviate from medical standards in their self-evaluations of weight appropriateness, and this lack of correspondence may reflect the normative judgments of various population subgroups. Clinical and public health programs that employ a uniform strategy or approach to the population may not be efficacious.",
keywords = "Body image, Eating disorders, Obesity, Overweight, Weight perception",
author = "Chang, {Virginia W.} and Christakis, {Nicholas A.}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008538.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "538--543",
journal = "Journal of General Internal Medicine",
issn = "0884-8734",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extent and determinants of discrepancy between self-evaluations of weight status and clinical standards

AU - Chang, Virginia W.

AU - Christakis, Nicholas A.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent and type of discordance between personal and medical classifications of weight status, and to examine the influence of sociodemographic factors on the misclassification of weight status. DESIGN/SETTING: The 1991 Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the U.S. population. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 18 years and older (N = 41,676). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents' self-evaluations of weight status were compared to classification of their body mass index (BMI) by medical standards. Twenty-nine percent of respondents incorrectly classified their weight status relative to medical standards, and the nature of this error was variable. While 27.4% of overweight persons judged their weight to be "just about right," of those who did judge themselves to be overweight, 23.9% were in fact normal or underweight according to their BMI. Overall, 16.6% of persons underassessed their weight category, and 12.4% overassessed their weight category. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, age, race, income, education, and occupation influenced the misclassification of weight status. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of Americans deviate from medical standards in their self-evaluations of weight appropriateness, and this lack of correspondence may reflect the normative judgments of various population subgroups. Clinical and public health programs that employ a uniform strategy or approach to the population may not be efficacious.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent and type of discordance between personal and medical classifications of weight status, and to examine the influence of sociodemographic factors on the misclassification of weight status. DESIGN/SETTING: The 1991 Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Supplement of the National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative, cross-sectional survey of the U.S. population. PARTICIPANTS: Adults 18 years and older (N = 41,676). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents' self-evaluations of weight status were compared to classification of their body mass index (BMI) by medical standards. Twenty-nine percent of respondents incorrectly classified their weight status relative to medical standards, and the nature of this error was variable. While 27.4% of overweight persons judged their weight to be "just about right," of those who did judge themselves to be overweight, 23.9% were in fact normal or underweight according to their BMI. Overall, 16.6% of persons underassessed their weight category, and 12.4% overassessed their weight category. Multivariate analysis revealed that sex, age, race, income, education, and occupation influenced the misclassification of weight status. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of Americans deviate from medical standards in their self-evaluations of weight appropriateness, and this lack of correspondence may reflect the normative judgments of various population subgroups. Clinical and public health programs that employ a uniform strategy or approach to the population may not be efficacious.

KW - Body image

KW - Eating disorders

KW - Obesity

KW - Overweight

KW - Weight perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035723695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035723695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008538.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008538.x

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 538

EP - 543

JO - Journal of General Internal Medicine

JF - Journal of General Internal Medicine

SN - 0884-8734

IS - 8

ER -