Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes

Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification

John Jost, Aaron C. Kay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many have suggested that complementary gender stereotypes of men as agentic (but not communal) and women as communal (but not agentic) serve to increase system justification, but direct experimental support has been lacking. The authors exposed people to specific types of gender-related beliefs and subsequently asked them to complete measures of gender-specific or diffuse system justification. In Studies 1 and 2, activating (a) communal or complementary (communal + agentic) gender stereotypes or (b) benevolent or complementary (benevolent + hostile) sexist items increased support for the status quo among women. In Study 3, activating stereotypes of men as agentic also increased system justification among men and women, but only when women's characteristics were associated with higher status. Results suggest that complementary stereotypes psychologically offset the one-sided advantage of any single group and contribute to an image of society in which everyone benefits through a balanced dispersion of benefits.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)498-509
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume88
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2005

Fingerprint

Sexism
sexism
stereotype
gender
image of society
Group

Keywords

  • Benevolent sexism
  • Complementary stereotypes
  • Gender
  • System justification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{91441367bdc6461bb8b739ea851640cf,
title = "Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification",
abstract = "Many have suggested that complementary gender stereotypes of men as agentic (but not communal) and women as communal (but not agentic) serve to increase system justification, but direct experimental support has been lacking. The authors exposed people to specific types of gender-related beliefs and subsequently asked them to complete measures of gender-specific or diffuse system justification. In Studies 1 and 2, activating (a) communal or complementary (communal + agentic) gender stereotypes or (b) benevolent or complementary (benevolent + hostile) sexist items increased support for the status quo among women. In Study 3, activating stereotypes of men as agentic also increased system justification among men and women, but only when women's characteristics were associated with higher status. Results suggest that complementary stereotypes psychologically offset the one-sided advantage of any single group and contribute to an image of society in which everyone benefits through a balanced dispersion of benefits.",
keywords = "Benevolent sexism, Complementary stereotypes, Gender, System justification",
author = "John Jost and Kay, {Aaron C.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "88",
pages = "498--509",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes

T2 - Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification

AU - Jost, John

AU - Kay, Aaron C.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Many have suggested that complementary gender stereotypes of men as agentic (but not communal) and women as communal (but not agentic) serve to increase system justification, but direct experimental support has been lacking. The authors exposed people to specific types of gender-related beliefs and subsequently asked them to complete measures of gender-specific or diffuse system justification. In Studies 1 and 2, activating (a) communal or complementary (communal + agentic) gender stereotypes or (b) benevolent or complementary (benevolent + hostile) sexist items increased support for the status quo among women. In Study 3, activating stereotypes of men as agentic also increased system justification among men and women, but only when women's characteristics were associated with higher status. Results suggest that complementary stereotypes psychologically offset the one-sided advantage of any single group and contribute to an image of society in which everyone benefits through a balanced dispersion of benefits.

AB - Many have suggested that complementary gender stereotypes of men as agentic (but not communal) and women as communal (but not agentic) serve to increase system justification, but direct experimental support has been lacking. The authors exposed people to specific types of gender-related beliefs and subsequently asked them to complete measures of gender-specific or diffuse system justification. In Studies 1 and 2, activating (a) communal or complementary (communal + agentic) gender stereotypes or (b) benevolent or complementary (benevolent + hostile) sexist items increased support for the status quo among women. In Study 3, activating stereotypes of men as agentic also increased system justification among men and women, but only when women's characteristics were associated with higher status. Results suggest that complementary stereotypes psychologically offset the one-sided advantage of any single group and contribute to an image of society in which everyone benefits through a balanced dispersion of benefits.

KW - Benevolent sexism

KW - Complementary stereotypes

KW - Gender

KW - System justification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14644390191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14644390191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498

M3 - Article

VL - 88

SP - 498

EP - 509

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 3

ER -