Exploratory analysis of signal coordination impacts on macroscopic fundamental diagram

Jan Torben Girault, Vikash V. Gayah, S. Ilgin Guler, Monica Menendez

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) of urban traffic is a recently developed tool to describe traffic on large-scale urban networks. A network's MFD can be significantly affected by various properties, including signal settings, block lengths, travel speeds, and routing behaviors. However, current understanding of the impact of signal offsets (i.e., signal coordination) on the MFD is limited to idealized one-dimensional networks, and little is known about how signal coordination affects the MFDs of more realistic two-dimensional networks. To overcome this gap, the present study examined the impacts of signal coordination on the MFD of an idealized two-dimensional grid network using both an analytical method and a microscopic traffic simulator (Aimsun). Seven coordination strategies were considered, including the simultaneous, alternating, double-alternating, one-dimensional green-wave, two-dimensional green-wave, MAXBAND, and random strategies. In general, the impacts of coordination were highly sensitive to the signal cycle length chosen. The results also revealed that poor coordination can significantly decrease the network capacity and the free-flow travel speed. However, good coordination offers little advantage over simultaneous offsets, even with directional travel demands moving in the prioritized directions. The reason is that the benefits provided to vehicles in the prioritized directions are negated by the disadvantages to vehicles traveling in the nonprioritized directions. These results suggest that the insights from other idealized simulations with simultaneous offsets may be generalizable to more realistic situations with more realistic coordination strategies.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)36-46
    Number of pages11
    JournalTransportation Research Record
    Volume2560
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    Simulators

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Civil and Structural Engineering
    • Mechanical Engineering

    Cite this

    Exploratory analysis of signal coordination impacts on macroscopic fundamental diagram. / Girault, Jan Torben; Gayah, Vikash V.; Guler, S. Ilgin; Menendez, Monica.

    In: Transportation Research Record, Vol. 2560, 01.01.2016, p. 36-46.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Girault, Jan Torben ; Gayah, Vikash V. ; Guler, S. Ilgin ; Menendez, Monica. / Exploratory analysis of signal coordination impacts on macroscopic fundamental diagram. In: Transportation Research Record. 2016 ; Vol. 2560. pp. 36-46.
    @article{ca179e5b04484df880e244eb4f9e6899,
    title = "Exploratory analysis of signal coordination impacts on macroscopic fundamental diagram",
    abstract = "The macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) of urban traffic is a recently developed tool to describe traffic on large-scale urban networks. A network's MFD can be significantly affected by various properties, including signal settings, block lengths, travel speeds, and routing behaviors. However, current understanding of the impact of signal offsets (i.e., signal coordination) on the MFD is limited to idealized one-dimensional networks, and little is known about how signal coordination affects the MFDs of more realistic two-dimensional networks. To overcome this gap, the present study examined the impacts of signal coordination on the MFD of an idealized two-dimensional grid network using both an analytical method and a microscopic traffic simulator (Aimsun). Seven coordination strategies were considered, including the simultaneous, alternating, double-alternating, one-dimensional green-wave, two-dimensional green-wave, MAXBAND, and random strategies. In general, the impacts of coordination were highly sensitive to the signal cycle length chosen. The results also revealed that poor coordination can significantly decrease the network capacity and the free-flow travel speed. However, good coordination offers little advantage over simultaneous offsets, even with directional travel demands moving in the prioritized directions. The reason is that the benefits provided to vehicles in the prioritized directions are negated by the disadvantages to vehicles traveling in the nonprioritized directions. These results suggest that the insights from other idealized simulations with simultaneous offsets may be generalizable to more realistic situations with more realistic coordination strategies.",
    author = "Girault, {Jan Torben} and Gayah, {Vikash V.} and Guler, {S. Ilgin} and Monica Menendez",
    year = "2016",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.3141/2560-05",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "2560",
    pages = "36--46",
    journal = "Transportation Research Record",
    issn = "0361-1981",
    publisher = "US National Research Council",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Exploratory analysis of signal coordination impacts on macroscopic fundamental diagram

    AU - Girault, Jan Torben

    AU - Gayah, Vikash V.

    AU - Guler, S. Ilgin

    AU - Menendez, Monica

    PY - 2016/1/1

    Y1 - 2016/1/1

    N2 - The macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) of urban traffic is a recently developed tool to describe traffic on large-scale urban networks. A network's MFD can be significantly affected by various properties, including signal settings, block lengths, travel speeds, and routing behaviors. However, current understanding of the impact of signal offsets (i.e., signal coordination) on the MFD is limited to idealized one-dimensional networks, and little is known about how signal coordination affects the MFDs of more realistic two-dimensional networks. To overcome this gap, the present study examined the impacts of signal coordination on the MFD of an idealized two-dimensional grid network using both an analytical method and a microscopic traffic simulator (Aimsun). Seven coordination strategies were considered, including the simultaneous, alternating, double-alternating, one-dimensional green-wave, two-dimensional green-wave, MAXBAND, and random strategies. In general, the impacts of coordination were highly sensitive to the signal cycle length chosen. The results also revealed that poor coordination can significantly decrease the network capacity and the free-flow travel speed. However, good coordination offers little advantage over simultaneous offsets, even with directional travel demands moving in the prioritized directions. The reason is that the benefits provided to vehicles in the prioritized directions are negated by the disadvantages to vehicles traveling in the nonprioritized directions. These results suggest that the insights from other idealized simulations with simultaneous offsets may be generalizable to more realistic situations with more realistic coordination strategies.

    AB - The macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) of urban traffic is a recently developed tool to describe traffic on large-scale urban networks. A network's MFD can be significantly affected by various properties, including signal settings, block lengths, travel speeds, and routing behaviors. However, current understanding of the impact of signal offsets (i.e., signal coordination) on the MFD is limited to idealized one-dimensional networks, and little is known about how signal coordination affects the MFDs of more realistic two-dimensional networks. To overcome this gap, the present study examined the impacts of signal coordination on the MFD of an idealized two-dimensional grid network using both an analytical method and a microscopic traffic simulator (Aimsun). Seven coordination strategies were considered, including the simultaneous, alternating, double-alternating, one-dimensional green-wave, two-dimensional green-wave, MAXBAND, and random strategies. In general, the impacts of coordination were highly sensitive to the signal cycle length chosen. The results also revealed that poor coordination can significantly decrease the network capacity and the free-flow travel speed. However, good coordination offers little advantage over simultaneous offsets, even with directional travel demands moving in the prioritized directions. The reason is that the benefits provided to vehicles in the prioritized directions are negated by the disadvantages to vehicles traveling in the nonprioritized directions. These results suggest that the insights from other idealized simulations with simultaneous offsets may be generalizable to more realistic situations with more realistic coordination strategies.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85015439132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85015439132&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.3141/2560-05

    DO - 10.3141/2560-05

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85015439132

    VL - 2560

    SP - 36

    EP - 46

    JO - Transportation Research Record

    JF - Transportation Research Record

    SN - 0361-1981

    ER -