Experimental studies of welfare reform and children

Martha J. Zaslow, Kristin A. Moore, Jennifer L. Brooks, Pamela A. Morris, Kathryn Tout, Zakia A. Redd, Carol A. Emig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Even prior to passage of federal welfare reform, many demonstration programs anticipated key features of the 1996 law, such as "work- first" strategies, time limits on welfare receipt, and financial incentives to work. Over the past decade, 10 experimental evaluations of these programs have extended their studies to examine the impacts on children. This article provides a synthesis of findings from the first seven of these studies to release results concerning child impacts. Key observations include the following: Right Half Black Circle Sign Across the different types of welfare-to-work programs examined, researchers found neither widespread harm nor widespread benefit to young children, but some significant impacts did occur. Right Half Black Circle Sign Favorable impacts tended to occur in programs that improved family economic status or maternal education, but these programs still did not bring children to the level of national norms for positive child development. Right Half Black Circle Sign Unfavorable impacts tended to occur when families did not show economic progress or when their economic situation worsened, when the children were adolescents, and - unexpectedly - when the families were believed to be at lower risk for long-term welfare receipt. Thus, although impacts were not widespread, these programs did have the potential to affect children for both better and worse across a range of developmental outcomes. The authors conclude that these findings underscore the importance of strengthening program approaches to enhance developmental outcomes for children in families being served by the welfare system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-95
Number of pages17
JournalThe Future of children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Child Welfare
welfare
reform
Economics
Program Evaluation
Child Development
economic situation
Motivation
economics
Mothers
Research Personnel
Education
incentive
adolescent
Law
evaluation
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Experimental studies of welfare reform and children. / Zaslow, Martha J.; Moore, Kristin A.; Brooks, Jennifer L.; Morris, Pamela A.; Tout, Kathryn; Redd, Zakia A.; Emig, Carol A.

In: The Future of children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Vol. 12, No. 1, 12.2002, p. 79-95.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zaslow, Martha J. ; Moore, Kristin A. ; Brooks, Jennifer L. ; Morris, Pamela A. ; Tout, Kathryn ; Redd, Zakia A. ; Emig, Carol A. / Experimental studies of welfare reform and children. In: The Future of children / Center for the Future of Children, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. 2002 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 79-95.
@article{da83a207180c419ca8d131aeea9dec5c,
title = "Experimental studies of welfare reform and children",
abstract = "Even prior to passage of federal welfare reform, many demonstration programs anticipated key features of the 1996 law, such as {"}work- first{"} strategies, time limits on welfare receipt, and financial incentives to work. Over the past decade, 10 experimental evaluations of these programs have extended their studies to examine the impacts on children. This article provides a synthesis of findings from the first seven of these studies to release results concerning child impacts. Key observations include the following: Right Half Black Circle Sign Across the different types of welfare-to-work programs examined, researchers found neither widespread harm nor widespread benefit to young children, but some significant impacts did occur. Right Half Black Circle Sign Favorable impacts tended to occur in programs that improved family economic status or maternal education, but these programs still did not bring children to the level of national norms for positive child development. Right Half Black Circle Sign Unfavorable impacts tended to occur when families did not show economic progress or when their economic situation worsened, when the children were adolescents, and - unexpectedly - when the families were believed to be at lower risk for long-term welfare receipt. Thus, although impacts were not widespread, these programs did have the potential to affect children for both better and worse across a range of developmental outcomes. The authors conclude that these findings underscore the importance of strengthening program approaches to enhance developmental outcomes for children in families being served by the welfare system.",
author = "Zaslow, {Martha J.} and Moore, {Kristin A.} and Brooks, {Jennifer L.} and Morris, {Pamela A.} and Kathryn Tout and Redd, {Zakia A.} and Emig, {Carol A.}",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "79--95",
journal = "Future of Children",
issn = "1054-8289",
publisher = "Center for the Future of Children",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental studies of welfare reform and children

AU - Zaslow, Martha J.

AU - Moore, Kristin A.

AU - Brooks, Jennifer L.

AU - Morris, Pamela A.

AU - Tout, Kathryn

AU - Redd, Zakia A.

AU - Emig, Carol A.

PY - 2002/12

Y1 - 2002/12

N2 - Even prior to passage of federal welfare reform, many demonstration programs anticipated key features of the 1996 law, such as "work- first" strategies, time limits on welfare receipt, and financial incentives to work. Over the past decade, 10 experimental evaluations of these programs have extended their studies to examine the impacts on children. This article provides a synthesis of findings from the first seven of these studies to release results concerning child impacts. Key observations include the following: Right Half Black Circle Sign Across the different types of welfare-to-work programs examined, researchers found neither widespread harm nor widespread benefit to young children, but some significant impacts did occur. Right Half Black Circle Sign Favorable impacts tended to occur in programs that improved family economic status or maternal education, but these programs still did not bring children to the level of national norms for positive child development. Right Half Black Circle Sign Unfavorable impacts tended to occur when families did not show economic progress or when their economic situation worsened, when the children were adolescents, and - unexpectedly - when the families were believed to be at lower risk for long-term welfare receipt. Thus, although impacts were not widespread, these programs did have the potential to affect children for both better and worse across a range of developmental outcomes. The authors conclude that these findings underscore the importance of strengthening program approaches to enhance developmental outcomes for children in families being served by the welfare system.

AB - Even prior to passage of federal welfare reform, many demonstration programs anticipated key features of the 1996 law, such as "work- first" strategies, time limits on welfare receipt, and financial incentives to work. Over the past decade, 10 experimental evaluations of these programs have extended their studies to examine the impacts on children. This article provides a synthesis of findings from the first seven of these studies to release results concerning child impacts. Key observations include the following: Right Half Black Circle Sign Across the different types of welfare-to-work programs examined, researchers found neither widespread harm nor widespread benefit to young children, but some significant impacts did occur. Right Half Black Circle Sign Favorable impacts tended to occur in programs that improved family economic status or maternal education, but these programs still did not bring children to the level of national norms for positive child development. Right Half Black Circle Sign Unfavorable impacts tended to occur when families did not show economic progress or when their economic situation worsened, when the children were adolescents, and - unexpectedly - when the families were believed to be at lower risk for long-term welfare receipt. Thus, although impacts were not widespread, these programs did have the potential to affect children for both better and worse across a range of developmental outcomes. The authors conclude that these findings underscore the importance of strengthening program approaches to enhance developmental outcomes for children in families being served by the welfare system.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036886181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036886181&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11980040

AN - SCOPUS:0036886181

VL - 12

SP - 79

EP - 95

JO - Future of Children

JF - Future of Children

SN - 1054-8289

IS - 1

ER -