Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness

Daryl Fougnie, René Marois

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When attention is engaged in a task, unexpected events in the visual scene may go undetected, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness (IB). At what stage of information processing must attention be engaged for IB to occur? Although manipulations that tax visuospatial attention can induce IB, the evidence is more equivocal for tasks that engage attention at late, central stages of information processing. Here, we tested whether IB can be specifically induced by central executive processes. An unexpected visual stimulus was presented during the retention interval of a working memory task that involved either simply maintaining verbal material or rearranging the material into alphabetical order. The unexpected stimulus was more likely to be missed during manipulation than during simple maintenance of the verbal information. Thus, the engagement of executive processes impairs the ability to detect unexpected, task-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting that IB can result from central, amodal stages of processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)142-147
Number of pages6
JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Blindness
Short-Term Memory
Automatic Data Processing
Aptitude
Working Memory
Inattentional Blindness
Manipulation
Information Processing
Stimulus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness. / Fougnie, Daryl; Marois, René.

In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 01.01.2007, p. 142-147.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be1dd8c024314303b872ad1c8532861a,
title = "Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness",
abstract = "When attention is engaged in a task, unexpected events in the visual scene may go undetected, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness (IB). At what stage of information processing must attention be engaged for IB to occur? Although manipulations that tax visuospatial attention can induce IB, the evidence is more equivocal for tasks that engage attention at late, central stages of information processing. Here, we tested whether IB can be specifically induced by central executive processes. An unexpected visual stimulus was presented during the retention interval of a working memory task that involved either simply maintaining verbal material or rearranging the material into alphabetical order. The unexpected stimulus was more likely to be missed during manipulation than during simple maintenance of the verbal information. Thus, the engagement of executive processes impairs the ability to detect unexpected, task-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting that IB can result from central, amodal stages of processing.",
author = "Daryl Fougnie and Ren{\'e} Marois",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03194041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "142--147",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness

AU - Fougnie, Daryl

AU - Marois, René

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - When attention is engaged in a task, unexpected events in the visual scene may go undetected, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness (IB). At what stage of information processing must attention be engaged for IB to occur? Although manipulations that tax visuospatial attention can induce IB, the evidence is more equivocal for tasks that engage attention at late, central stages of information processing. Here, we tested whether IB can be specifically induced by central executive processes. An unexpected visual stimulus was presented during the retention interval of a working memory task that involved either simply maintaining verbal material or rearranging the material into alphabetical order. The unexpected stimulus was more likely to be missed during manipulation than during simple maintenance of the verbal information. Thus, the engagement of executive processes impairs the ability to detect unexpected, task-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting that IB can result from central, amodal stages of processing.

AB - When attention is engaged in a task, unexpected events in the visual scene may go undetected, a phenomenon known as inattentional blindness (IB). At what stage of information processing must attention be engaged for IB to occur? Although manipulations that tax visuospatial attention can induce IB, the evidence is more equivocal for tasks that engage attention at late, central stages of information processing. Here, we tested whether IB can be specifically induced by central executive processes. An unexpected visual stimulus was presented during the retention interval of a working memory task that involved either simply maintaining verbal material or rearranging the material into alphabetical order. The unexpected stimulus was more likely to be missed during manipulation than during simple maintenance of the verbal information. Thus, the engagement of executive processes impairs the ability to detect unexpected, task-irrelevant stimuli, suggesting that IB can result from central, amodal stages of processing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34447339416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34447339416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03194041

DO - 10.3758/BF03194041

M3 - Article

C2 - 17546744

AN - SCOPUS:34447339416

VL - 14

SP - 142

EP - 147

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 1

ER -