Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies: Where we are and where we need to go

Barbara Resnick, Albert J. Bellg, Belinda Borrelli, Carol DeFrancesco, Rosemary Breger, Jacki Hecht, Daryl L. Sharp, Chantal Levesque, Denise Orwig, Denise Ernst, Gbenga Ogedegbe, Susan Czajkowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Treatment fidelity plays an important role in the research team's ability to ensure that a treatment has been implemented as intended and that the treatment has been accurately tested. Developing, implementing, and evaluating a treatment fidelity plan can be challenging. The treatment fidelity workgroup within the Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) developed guidelines to comprehensively evaluate treatment fidelity in behavior change research. The guidelines include evaluation of treatment fidelity with regard to study design, training of interventionists, delivery and receipt of the intervention, and enactment of the intervention in real-life settings. This article describes these guidelines and provides examples from four BCC studies as to how these recommended guidelines for fidelity were considered. Future work needs to focus not only on implementing treatment fidelity plans but also on quantifying the evaluations performed, developing specific criteria for interpretation of the findings, and establishing best practices of treatment fidelity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-54
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Behavioral Medicine
Volume29
Issue numberSUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Guidelines
Practice Guidelines
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Resnick, B., Bellg, A. J., Borrelli, B., DeFrancesco, C., Breger, R., Hecht, J., ... Czajkowski, S. (2005). Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies: Where we are and where we need to go. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 29(SUPPL.), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_8

Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies : Where we are and where we need to go. / Resnick, Barbara; Bellg, Albert J.; Borrelli, Belinda; DeFrancesco, Carol; Breger, Rosemary; Hecht, Jacki; Sharp, Daryl L.; Levesque, Chantal; Orwig, Denise; Ernst, Denise; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Czajkowski, Susan.

In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 29, No. SUPPL., 2005, p. 46-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Resnick, B, Bellg, AJ, Borrelli, B, DeFrancesco, C, Breger, R, Hecht, J, Sharp, DL, Levesque, C, Orwig, D, Ernst, D, Ogedegbe, G & Czajkowski, S 2005, 'Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies: Where we are and where we need to go', Annals of Behavioral Medicine, vol. 29, no. SUPPL., pp. 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_8
Resnick, Barbara ; Bellg, Albert J. ; Borrelli, Belinda ; DeFrancesco, Carol ; Breger, Rosemary ; Hecht, Jacki ; Sharp, Daryl L. ; Levesque, Chantal ; Orwig, Denise ; Ernst, Denise ; Ogedegbe, Gbenga ; Czajkowski, Susan. / Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies : Where we are and where we need to go. In: Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2005 ; Vol. 29, No. SUPPL. pp. 46-54.
@article{7e5786f90ecd4f1aaad783f5853f0304,
title = "Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies: Where we are and where we need to go",
abstract = "Treatment fidelity plays an important role in the research team's ability to ensure that a treatment has been implemented as intended and that the treatment has been accurately tested. Developing, implementing, and evaluating a treatment fidelity plan can be challenging. The treatment fidelity workgroup within the Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) developed guidelines to comprehensively evaluate treatment fidelity in behavior change research. The guidelines include evaluation of treatment fidelity with regard to study design, training of interventionists, delivery and receipt of the intervention, and enactment of the intervention in real-life settings. This article describes these guidelines and provides examples from four BCC studies as to how these recommended guidelines for fidelity were considered. Future work needs to focus not only on implementing treatment fidelity plans but also on quantifying the evaluations performed, developing specific criteria for interpretation of the findings, and establishing best practices of treatment fidelity.",
author = "Barbara Resnick and Bellg, {Albert J.} and Belinda Borrelli and Carol DeFrancesco and Rosemary Breger and Jacki Hecht and Sharp, {Daryl L.} and Chantal Levesque and Denise Orwig and Denise Ernst and Gbenga Ogedegbe and Susan Czajkowski",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "46--54",
journal = "Annals of Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "0883-6612",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "SUPPL.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examples of implementation and evaluation of treatment fidelity in the BCC Studies

T2 - Where we are and where we need to go

AU - Resnick, Barbara

AU - Bellg, Albert J.

AU - Borrelli, Belinda

AU - DeFrancesco, Carol

AU - Breger, Rosemary

AU - Hecht, Jacki

AU - Sharp, Daryl L.

AU - Levesque, Chantal

AU - Orwig, Denise

AU - Ernst, Denise

AU - Ogedegbe, Gbenga

AU - Czajkowski, Susan

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Treatment fidelity plays an important role in the research team's ability to ensure that a treatment has been implemented as intended and that the treatment has been accurately tested. Developing, implementing, and evaluating a treatment fidelity plan can be challenging. The treatment fidelity workgroup within the Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) developed guidelines to comprehensively evaluate treatment fidelity in behavior change research. The guidelines include evaluation of treatment fidelity with regard to study design, training of interventionists, delivery and receipt of the intervention, and enactment of the intervention in real-life settings. This article describes these guidelines and provides examples from four BCC studies as to how these recommended guidelines for fidelity were considered. Future work needs to focus not only on implementing treatment fidelity plans but also on quantifying the evaluations performed, developing specific criteria for interpretation of the findings, and establishing best practices of treatment fidelity.

AB - Treatment fidelity plays an important role in the research team's ability to ensure that a treatment has been implemented as intended and that the treatment has been accurately tested. Developing, implementing, and evaluating a treatment fidelity plan can be challenging. The treatment fidelity workgroup within the Behavior Change Consortium (BCC) developed guidelines to comprehensively evaluate treatment fidelity in behavior change research. The guidelines include evaluation of treatment fidelity with regard to study design, training of interventionists, delivery and receipt of the intervention, and enactment of the intervention in real-life settings. This article describes these guidelines and provides examples from four BCC studies as to how these recommended guidelines for fidelity were considered. Future work needs to focus not only on implementing treatment fidelity plans but also on quantifying the evaluations performed, developing specific criteria for interpretation of the findings, and establishing best practices of treatment fidelity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844395119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17844395119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_8

DO - 10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_8

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 46

EP - 54

JO - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

JF - Annals of Behavioral Medicine

SN - 0883-6612

IS - SUPPL.

ER -