Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems

Om P. Tripathi, Mark Baldwin, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Martin Charron, Jacob C H Cheung, Stephen D. Eckermann, Edwin Gerber, David R. Jackson, Yuhji Kuroda, Andrea Lang, Justin McLay, Ryo Mizuta, Carolyn Reynolds, Greg Roff, Michael Sigmond, Seok Woo Son, Tim Stockdale

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The first multimodel study to estimate the predictability of a boreal sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is performed using five NWP systems. During the 2012/13 boreal winter, anomalous upward propagating planetary wave activity was observed toward the end of December, which was followed by a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation around 2 January 2013, and on 7 January 2013 the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly. This stratospheric dynamical activity was followed by an equatorward shift of the tropospheric jet stream and by a high pressure anomaly over the North Atlantic, which resulted in severe cold conditions in the United Kingdom and northern Europe. In most of the five models, the SSW event was predicted 10 days in advance. However, only some ensemble members in most of the models predicted weakening of westerly wind when the models were initialized 15 days in advance of the SSW. Further dynamical analysis of the SSW shows that this event was characterized by the anomalous planetary wavenumber-1 amplification followed by the anomalous wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere, which resulted in a split vortex occurring between 6 and 8 January 2013. The models have some success in reproducing wavenumber-1 activity when initialized 15 days in advance, but they generally failed to produce the wavenumber-2 activity during the final days of the event. Detailed analysis shows that models have reasonably good skill in forecasting tropospheric blocking features that stimulate wavenumber-2 amplification in the troposphere, but they have limited skill in reproducing wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1935-1960
Number of pages26
JournalMonthly Weather Review
Volume144
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Fingerprint

amplification
westerly
stratosphere
jet stream
planetary wave
zonal wind
vortex
troposphere
sudden stratospheric warming
anomaly
winter
analysis

Keywords

  • Circulation/Dynamics
  • Ensembles
  • Forecasting
  • Model evaluation/performance
  • Models and modeling
  • Numerical weather prediction/forecasting
  • Operational forecasting
  • Stratospheric circulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atmospheric Science

Cite this

Tripathi, O. P., Baldwin, M., Charlton-Perez, A., Charron, M., Cheung, J. C. H., Eckermann, S. D., ... Stockdale, T. (2016). Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems. Monthly Weather Review, 144(5), 1935-1960. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1

Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems. / Tripathi, Om P.; Baldwin, Mark; Charlton-Perez, Andrew; Charron, Martin; Cheung, Jacob C H; Eckermann, Stephen D.; Gerber, Edwin; Jackson, David R.; Kuroda, Yuhji; Lang, Andrea; McLay, Justin; Mizuta, Ryo; Reynolds, Carolyn; Roff, Greg; Sigmond, Michael; Son, Seok Woo; Stockdale, Tim.

In: Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 144, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 1935-1960.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tripathi, OP, Baldwin, M, Charlton-Perez, A, Charron, M, Cheung, JCH, Eckermann, SD, Gerber, E, Jackson, DR, Kuroda, Y, Lang, A, McLay, J, Mizuta, R, Reynolds, C, Roff, G, Sigmond, M, Son, SW & Stockdale, T 2016, 'Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems', Monthly Weather Review, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 1935-1960. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1
Tripathi OP, Baldwin M, Charlton-Perez A, Charron M, Cheung JCH, Eckermann SD et al. Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems. Monthly Weather Review. 2016 May 1;144(5):1935-1960. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1
Tripathi, Om P. ; Baldwin, Mark ; Charlton-Perez, Andrew ; Charron, Martin ; Cheung, Jacob C H ; Eckermann, Stephen D. ; Gerber, Edwin ; Jackson, David R. ; Kuroda, Yuhji ; Lang, Andrea ; McLay, Justin ; Mizuta, Ryo ; Reynolds, Carolyn ; Roff, Greg ; Sigmond, Michael ; Son, Seok Woo ; Stockdale, Tim. / Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems. In: Monthly Weather Review. 2016 ; Vol. 144, No. 5. pp. 1935-1960.
@article{85216100f03243268aa52587848053b4,
title = "Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems",
abstract = "The first multimodel study to estimate the predictability of a boreal sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is performed using five NWP systems. During the 2012/13 boreal winter, anomalous upward propagating planetary wave activity was observed toward the end of December, which was followed by a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation around 2 January 2013, and on 7 January 2013 the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly. This stratospheric dynamical activity was followed by an equatorward shift of the tropospheric jet stream and by a high pressure anomaly over the North Atlantic, which resulted in severe cold conditions in the United Kingdom and northern Europe. In most of the five models, the SSW event was predicted 10 days in advance. However, only some ensemble members in most of the models predicted weakening of westerly wind when the models were initialized 15 days in advance of the SSW. Further dynamical analysis of the SSW shows that this event was characterized by the anomalous planetary wavenumber-1 amplification followed by the anomalous wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere, which resulted in a split vortex occurring between 6 and 8 January 2013. The models have some success in reproducing wavenumber-1 activity when initialized 15 days in advance, but they generally failed to produce the wavenumber-2 activity during the final days of the event. Detailed analysis shows that models have reasonably good skill in forecasting tropospheric blocking features that stimulate wavenumber-2 amplification in the troposphere, but they have limited skill in reproducing wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere.",
keywords = "Circulation/Dynamics, Ensembles, Forecasting, Model evaluation/performance, Models and modeling, Numerical weather prediction/forecasting, Operational forecasting, Stratospheric circulation",
author = "Tripathi, {Om P.} and Mark Baldwin and Andrew Charlton-Perez and Martin Charron and Cheung, {Jacob C H} and Eckermann, {Stephen D.} and Edwin Gerber and Jackson, {David R.} and Yuhji Kuroda and Andrea Lang and Justin McLay and Ryo Mizuta and Carolyn Reynolds and Greg Roff and Michael Sigmond and Son, {Seok Woo} and Tim Stockdale",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "144",
pages = "1935--1960",
journal = "Monthly Weather Review",
issn = "0027-0644",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Predictability of the Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013 Using Multiple NWP Systems

AU - Tripathi, Om P.

AU - Baldwin, Mark

AU - Charlton-Perez, Andrew

AU - Charron, Martin

AU - Cheung, Jacob C H

AU - Eckermann, Stephen D.

AU - Gerber, Edwin

AU - Jackson, David R.

AU - Kuroda, Yuhji

AU - Lang, Andrea

AU - McLay, Justin

AU - Mizuta, Ryo

AU - Reynolds, Carolyn

AU - Roff, Greg

AU - Sigmond, Michael

AU - Son, Seok Woo

AU - Stockdale, Tim

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - The first multimodel study to estimate the predictability of a boreal sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is performed using five NWP systems. During the 2012/13 boreal winter, anomalous upward propagating planetary wave activity was observed toward the end of December, which was followed by a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation around 2 January 2013, and on 7 January 2013 the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly. This stratospheric dynamical activity was followed by an equatorward shift of the tropospheric jet stream and by a high pressure anomaly over the North Atlantic, which resulted in severe cold conditions in the United Kingdom and northern Europe. In most of the five models, the SSW event was predicted 10 days in advance. However, only some ensemble members in most of the models predicted weakening of westerly wind when the models were initialized 15 days in advance of the SSW. Further dynamical analysis of the SSW shows that this event was characterized by the anomalous planetary wavenumber-1 amplification followed by the anomalous wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere, which resulted in a split vortex occurring between 6 and 8 January 2013. The models have some success in reproducing wavenumber-1 activity when initialized 15 days in advance, but they generally failed to produce the wavenumber-2 activity during the final days of the event. Detailed analysis shows that models have reasonably good skill in forecasting tropospheric blocking features that stimulate wavenumber-2 amplification in the troposphere, but they have limited skill in reproducing wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere.

AB - The first multimodel study to estimate the predictability of a boreal sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) is performed using five NWP systems. During the 2012/13 boreal winter, anomalous upward propagating planetary wave activity was observed toward the end of December, which was followed by a rapid deceleration of the westerly circulation around 2 January 2013, and on 7 January 2013 the zonal-mean zonal wind at 60°N and 10 hPa reversed to easterly. This stratospheric dynamical activity was followed by an equatorward shift of the tropospheric jet stream and by a high pressure anomaly over the North Atlantic, which resulted in severe cold conditions in the United Kingdom and northern Europe. In most of the five models, the SSW event was predicted 10 days in advance. However, only some ensemble members in most of the models predicted weakening of westerly wind when the models were initialized 15 days in advance of the SSW. Further dynamical analysis of the SSW shows that this event was characterized by the anomalous planetary wavenumber-1 amplification followed by the anomalous wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere, which resulted in a split vortex occurring between 6 and 8 January 2013. The models have some success in reproducing wavenumber-1 activity when initialized 15 days in advance, but they generally failed to produce the wavenumber-2 activity during the final days of the event. Detailed analysis shows that models have reasonably good skill in forecasting tropospheric blocking features that stimulate wavenumber-2 amplification in the troposphere, but they have limited skill in reproducing wavenumber-2 amplification in the stratosphere.

KW - Circulation/Dynamics

KW - Ensembles

KW - Forecasting

KW - Model evaluation/performance

KW - Models and modeling

KW - Numerical weather prediction/forecasting

KW - Operational forecasting

KW - Stratospheric circulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966349350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84966349350&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1

DO - 10.1175/MWR-D-15-0010.1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84966349350

VL - 144

SP - 1935

EP - 1960

JO - Monthly Weather Review

JF - Monthly Weather Review

SN - 0027-0644

IS - 5

ER -