Everyday understandings of the law in working‐class America

Sally Merry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    An ethnographic examination of the way working‐class Americans who use courts to manage their family and neighborhood disputes think about and use the law suggests that they share beliefs in legal rights and the legal ordering of society characteristic of American society in general. However, when they encounter the courts they develop a more complex understanding that incorporates the plural legal ideologies found within the courthouse. The process of constructing local as well as dominant ideologies has implications for understanding the role of ideology in the maintenance of social order and for analyzing the hegemonic function of law. [legal anthropology, ideology, dispute processing, social control, theory of the state] 1986 American Anthropological Association

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)253-270
    Number of pages18
    JournalAmerican Ethnologist
    Volume13
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1986

    Fingerprint

    Ideologies
    ideology
    theory of the state
    Law
    control theory
    social order
    social control
    anthropology
    examination
    Society

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Anthropology

    Cite this

    Everyday understandings of the law in working‐class America. / Merry, Sally.

    In: American Ethnologist, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1986, p. 253-270.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Merry, Sally. / Everyday understandings of the law in working‐class America. In: American Ethnologist. 1986 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 253-270.
    @article{b67c21956bce42d693df3a230f24ce77,
    title = "Everyday understandings of the law in working‐class America",
    abstract = "An ethnographic examination of the way working‐class Americans who use courts to manage their family and neighborhood disputes think about and use the law suggests that they share beliefs in legal rights and the legal ordering of society characteristic of American society in general. However, when they encounter the courts they develop a more complex understanding that incorporates the plural legal ideologies found within the courthouse. The process of constructing local as well as dominant ideologies has implications for understanding the role of ideology in the maintenance of social order and for analyzing the hegemonic function of law. [legal anthropology, ideology, dispute processing, social control, theory of the state] 1986 American Anthropological Association",
    author = "Sally Merry",
    year = "1986",
    doi = "10.1525/ae.1986.13.2.02a00040",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "13",
    pages = "253--270",
    journal = "American Ethnologist",
    issn = "0094-0496",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Everyday understandings of the law in working‐class America

    AU - Merry, Sally

    PY - 1986

    Y1 - 1986

    N2 - An ethnographic examination of the way working‐class Americans who use courts to manage their family and neighborhood disputes think about and use the law suggests that they share beliefs in legal rights and the legal ordering of society characteristic of American society in general. However, when they encounter the courts they develop a more complex understanding that incorporates the plural legal ideologies found within the courthouse. The process of constructing local as well as dominant ideologies has implications for understanding the role of ideology in the maintenance of social order and for analyzing the hegemonic function of law. [legal anthropology, ideology, dispute processing, social control, theory of the state] 1986 American Anthropological Association

    AB - An ethnographic examination of the way working‐class Americans who use courts to manage their family and neighborhood disputes think about and use the law suggests that they share beliefs in legal rights and the legal ordering of society characteristic of American society in general. However, when they encounter the courts they develop a more complex understanding that incorporates the plural legal ideologies found within the courthouse. The process of constructing local as well as dominant ideologies has implications for understanding the role of ideology in the maintenance of social order and for analyzing the hegemonic function of law. [legal anthropology, ideology, dispute processing, social control, theory of the state] 1986 American Anthropological Association

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981915278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981915278&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1525/ae.1986.13.2.02a00040

    DO - 10.1525/ae.1986.13.2.02a00040

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84981915278

    VL - 13

    SP - 253

    EP - 270

    JO - American Ethnologist

    JF - American Ethnologist

    SN - 0094-0496

    IS - 2

    ER -