Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works

Julie A. Clarke, Debra Laefer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Risk assessment procedures for underground projects form a key component of pre-construction efforts since resulting ground movements may cause damage to adjacent structures. Particularly for urban tunnelling works, surface settlements may impinge on a vast number of structures and can result in significant lawsuits unless the appropriate building protection measures are implemented. Although the understanding of tunnelling induced building damage has advanced greatly in recent decades, damage and litigation persist. Hence, this paper reconsiders the pre-construction risk assessment procedures undertaken during the generation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by formally including considerations relating to a building's historical significance, present usage, and current physical condition. In doing so, a holistic approach to risk assessment is proposed, allowing for project resources to be targeted towards buildings that are most at risk. This is demonstrated through a Class A prediction for a section of an upcoming underground railway system in which 14% of the selected study area of 220 buildings are identified to be at risk. Results are compared to those produced by the official EIS where building vulnerabilities are considered in isolation from the damage prediction assessment and just 5% of buildings are considered to be at risk. The proposed methodology offers a standardised procedure for incorporating both cultural and physical aspects of each building, thereby providing a more systematic, comprehensive procedure for pre-construction risk assessment than previously available.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-342
Number of pages10
JournalTunnelling and Underground Space Technology
Volume40
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
risk assessment
damage
Environmental impact
ground movement
holistic approach
prediction
vulnerability
methodology
evaluation
resource
project
environmental impact statement

Keywords

  • Ground movements
  • Historic buildings
  • Risk assessment
  • Urban tunnelling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works. / Clarke, Julie A.; Laefer, Debra.

In: Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 40, 02.2014, p. 333-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{918d66f52e1a4fa2bc3d41abb33032ab,
title = "Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works",
abstract = "Risk assessment procedures for underground projects form a key component of pre-construction efforts since resulting ground movements may cause damage to adjacent structures. Particularly for urban tunnelling works, surface settlements may impinge on a vast number of structures and can result in significant lawsuits unless the appropriate building protection measures are implemented. Although the understanding of tunnelling induced building damage has advanced greatly in recent decades, damage and litigation persist. Hence, this paper reconsiders the pre-construction risk assessment procedures undertaken during the generation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by formally including considerations relating to a building's historical significance, present usage, and current physical condition. In doing so, a holistic approach to risk assessment is proposed, allowing for project resources to be targeted towards buildings that are most at risk. This is demonstrated through a Class A prediction for a section of an upcoming underground railway system in which 14{\%} of the selected study area of 220 buildings are identified to be at risk. Results are compared to those produced by the official EIS where building vulnerabilities are considered in isolation from the damage prediction assessment and just 5{\%} of buildings are considered to be at risk. The proposed methodology offers a standardised procedure for incorporating both cultural and physical aspects of each building, thereby providing a more systematic, comprehensive procedure for pre-construction risk assessment than previously available.",
keywords = "Ground movements, Historic buildings, Risk assessment, Urban tunnelling",
author = "Clarke, {Julie A.} and Debra Laefer",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "333--342",
journal = "Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology",
issn = "0886-7798",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of risk assessment procedures for buildings adjacent to tunnelling works

AU - Clarke, Julie A.

AU - Laefer, Debra

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Risk assessment procedures for underground projects form a key component of pre-construction efforts since resulting ground movements may cause damage to adjacent structures. Particularly for urban tunnelling works, surface settlements may impinge on a vast number of structures and can result in significant lawsuits unless the appropriate building protection measures are implemented. Although the understanding of tunnelling induced building damage has advanced greatly in recent decades, damage and litigation persist. Hence, this paper reconsiders the pre-construction risk assessment procedures undertaken during the generation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by formally including considerations relating to a building's historical significance, present usage, and current physical condition. In doing so, a holistic approach to risk assessment is proposed, allowing for project resources to be targeted towards buildings that are most at risk. This is demonstrated through a Class A prediction for a section of an upcoming underground railway system in which 14% of the selected study area of 220 buildings are identified to be at risk. Results are compared to those produced by the official EIS where building vulnerabilities are considered in isolation from the damage prediction assessment and just 5% of buildings are considered to be at risk. The proposed methodology offers a standardised procedure for incorporating both cultural and physical aspects of each building, thereby providing a more systematic, comprehensive procedure for pre-construction risk assessment than previously available.

AB - Risk assessment procedures for underground projects form a key component of pre-construction efforts since resulting ground movements may cause damage to adjacent structures. Particularly for urban tunnelling works, surface settlements may impinge on a vast number of structures and can result in significant lawsuits unless the appropriate building protection measures are implemented. Although the understanding of tunnelling induced building damage has advanced greatly in recent decades, damage and litigation persist. Hence, this paper reconsiders the pre-construction risk assessment procedures undertaken during the generation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by formally including considerations relating to a building's historical significance, present usage, and current physical condition. In doing so, a holistic approach to risk assessment is proposed, allowing for project resources to be targeted towards buildings that are most at risk. This is demonstrated through a Class A prediction for a section of an upcoming underground railway system in which 14% of the selected study area of 220 buildings are identified to be at risk. Results are compared to those produced by the official EIS where building vulnerabilities are considered in isolation from the damage prediction assessment and just 5% of buildings are considered to be at risk. The proposed methodology offers a standardised procedure for incorporating both cultural and physical aspects of each building, thereby providing a more systematic, comprehensive procedure for pre-construction risk assessment than previously available.

KW - Ground movements

KW - Historic buildings

KW - Risk assessment

KW - Urban tunnelling

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888809196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888809196&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.014

DO - 10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.014

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 333

EP - 342

JO - Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

JF - Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology

SN - 0886-7798

ER -