Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress

Dale J. Langford, Bruce Cooper, Steven Paul, Janice Humphreys, Carolyn Keagy, Yvette P. Conley, Marilyn Hammer, Jon D. Levine, Fay Wright, Michelle Melisko, Christine Miaskowski, Laura B. Dunn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Lifetime stressful life events (SLEs) may predispose oncology patients to cancer-related distress (i.e., intrusive thoughts, hyperarousal, avoidance). Coping may influence cancer-related distress by mediating this relationship. This study sought to (a) determine the prevalence and impact of lifetime SLEs among oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy and (b) examine the relationship between SLEs and cancer-related distress and the mediating role of coping on this relationship. Method: Patients (n = 957), with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic or lung cancer, who were undergoing chemotherapy, completed the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), a measure of lifetime SLEs. Cancer-related distress was assessed with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Coping strategies since beginning chemotherapy were assessed with the Brief COPE; 2 latent variables (engagement and disengagement coping) were identified based on these scores. LSC-R scores (number of SLEs and perceived impact during the prior year) were evaluated in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between LSC-R and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores and the mediating role of engagement and disengagement coping on this relationship. Results: On average, patients reported 6.1 (SD = 4.0; range = 0-23 out of 30) SLEs. Patients who were not married/partnered, had incomes <$30,000/year, or who had lower functional status or greater comorbidity had higher LSC-R scores. The relationship between more SLEs and more severe cancer-related distress was completely mediated by disengagement coping. Engagement coping did not mediate this relationship. Conclusions: Disengagement coping, including behavioral disengagement, avoidance, and denial, should be targeted to mitigate cancer-related distress. (PsycINFO Database Record

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalHealth Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 21 2017

Fingerprint

Neoplasms
Checklist
Drug Therapy
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms
Comorbidity
Lung Neoplasms
Breast
Outpatients
Demography

Keywords

  • Cancer
  • Chemotherapy
  • Coping
  • Distress
  • Life stressors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Langford, D. J., Cooper, B., Paul, S., Humphreys, J., Keagy, C., Conley, Y. P., ... Dunn, L. B. (Accepted/In press). Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress. Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000524

Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress. / Langford, Dale J.; Cooper, Bruce; Paul, Steven; Humphreys, Janice; Keagy, Carolyn; Conley, Yvette P.; Hammer, Marilyn; Levine, Jon D.; Wright, Fay; Melisko, Michelle; Miaskowski, Christine; Dunn, Laura B.

In: Health Psychology, 21.08.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Langford, DJ, Cooper, B, Paul, S, Humphreys, J, Keagy, C, Conley, YP, Hammer, M, Levine, JD, Wright, F, Melisko, M, Miaskowski, C & Dunn, LB 2017, 'Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress', Health Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000524
Langford, Dale J. ; Cooper, Bruce ; Paul, Steven ; Humphreys, Janice ; Keagy, Carolyn ; Conley, Yvette P. ; Hammer, Marilyn ; Levine, Jon D. ; Wright, Fay ; Melisko, Michelle ; Miaskowski, Christine ; Dunn, Laura B. / Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress. In: Health Psychology. 2017.
@article{2c94e5904c604852913f6d0094928998,
title = "Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress",
abstract = "Objective: Lifetime stressful life events (SLEs) may predispose oncology patients to cancer-related distress (i.e., intrusive thoughts, hyperarousal, avoidance). Coping may influence cancer-related distress by mediating this relationship. This study sought to (a) determine the prevalence and impact of lifetime SLEs among oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy and (b) examine the relationship between SLEs and cancer-related distress and the mediating role of coping on this relationship. Method: Patients (n = 957), with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic or lung cancer, who were undergoing chemotherapy, completed the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), a measure of lifetime SLEs. Cancer-related distress was assessed with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Coping strategies since beginning chemotherapy were assessed with the Brief COPE; 2 latent variables (engagement and disengagement coping) were identified based on these scores. LSC-R scores (number of SLEs and perceived impact during the prior year) were evaluated in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between LSC-R and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores and the mediating role of engagement and disengagement coping on this relationship. Results: On average, patients reported 6.1 (SD = 4.0; range = 0-23 out of 30) SLEs. Patients who were not married/partnered, had incomes <$30,000/year, or who had lower functional status or greater comorbidity had higher LSC-R scores. The relationship between more SLEs and more severe cancer-related distress was completely mediated by disengagement coping. Engagement coping did not mediate this relationship. Conclusions: Disengagement coping, including behavioral disengagement, avoidance, and denial, should be targeted to mitigate cancer-related distress. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "Cancer, Chemotherapy, Coping, Distress, Life stressors",
author = "Langford, {Dale J.} and Bruce Cooper and Steven Paul and Janice Humphreys and Carolyn Keagy and Conley, {Yvette P.} and Marilyn Hammer and Levine, {Jon D.} and Fay Wright and Michelle Melisko and Christine Miaskowski and Dunn, {Laura B.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1037/hea0000524",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Health Psychology",
issn = "0278-6133",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of Coping as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Stressful Life Events and Cancer-Related Distress

AU - Langford, Dale J.

AU - Cooper, Bruce

AU - Paul, Steven

AU - Humphreys, Janice

AU - Keagy, Carolyn

AU - Conley, Yvette P.

AU - Hammer, Marilyn

AU - Levine, Jon D.

AU - Wright, Fay

AU - Melisko, Michelle

AU - Miaskowski, Christine

AU - Dunn, Laura B.

PY - 2017/8/21

Y1 - 2017/8/21

N2 - Objective: Lifetime stressful life events (SLEs) may predispose oncology patients to cancer-related distress (i.e., intrusive thoughts, hyperarousal, avoidance). Coping may influence cancer-related distress by mediating this relationship. This study sought to (a) determine the prevalence and impact of lifetime SLEs among oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy and (b) examine the relationship between SLEs and cancer-related distress and the mediating role of coping on this relationship. Method: Patients (n = 957), with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic or lung cancer, who were undergoing chemotherapy, completed the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), a measure of lifetime SLEs. Cancer-related distress was assessed with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Coping strategies since beginning chemotherapy were assessed with the Brief COPE; 2 latent variables (engagement and disengagement coping) were identified based on these scores. LSC-R scores (number of SLEs and perceived impact during the prior year) were evaluated in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between LSC-R and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores and the mediating role of engagement and disengagement coping on this relationship. Results: On average, patients reported 6.1 (SD = 4.0; range = 0-23 out of 30) SLEs. Patients who were not married/partnered, had incomes <$30,000/year, or who had lower functional status or greater comorbidity had higher LSC-R scores. The relationship between more SLEs and more severe cancer-related distress was completely mediated by disengagement coping. Engagement coping did not mediate this relationship. Conclusions: Disengagement coping, including behavioral disengagement, avoidance, and denial, should be targeted to mitigate cancer-related distress. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - Objective: Lifetime stressful life events (SLEs) may predispose oncology patients to cancer-related distress (i.e., intrusive thoughts, hyperarousal, avoidance). Coping may influence cancer-related distress by mediating this relationship. This study sought to (a) determine the prevalence and impact of lifetime SLEs among oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy and (b) examine the relationship between SLEs and cancer-related distress and the mediating role of coping on this relationship. Method: Patients (n = 957), with breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic or lung cancer, who were undergoing chemotherapy, completed the Life Stressor Checklist-Revised (LSC-R), a measure of lifetime SLEs. Cancer-related distress was assessed with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Coping strategies since beginning chemotherapy were assessed with the Brief COPE; 2 latent variables (engagement and disengagement coping) were identified based on these scores. LSC-R scores (number of SLEs and perceived impact during the prior year) were evaluated in relation to demographic and clinical characteristics. Structural equation modeling was used to evaluate the relationship between LSC-R and Impact of Event Scale-Revised scores and the mediating role of engagement and disengagement coping on this relationship. Results: On average, patients reported 6.1 (SD = 4.0; range = 0-23 out of 30) SLEs. Patients who were not married/partnered, had incomes <$30,000/year, or who had lower functional status or greater comorbidity had higher LSC-R scores. The relationship between more SLEs and more severe cancer-related distress was completely mediated by disengagement coping. Engagement coping did not mediate this relationship. Conclusions: Disengagement coping, including behavioral disengagement, avoidance, and denial, should be targeted to mitigate cancer-related distress. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - Cancer

KW - Chemotherapy

KW - Coping

KW - Distress

KW - Life stressors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027981733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027981733&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/hea0000524

DO - 10.1037/hea0000524

M3 - Article

JO - Health Psychology

JF - Health Psychology

SN - 0278-6133

ER -